From Fedora Project Wiki
(wwoods response to markmc) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish? | * Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish? | ||
---[[User:Markmc|markmc]] | ---[[User:Markmc|markmc]] | ||
* ''"if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken"'': Sure, if we were doing everything else right this wouldn't be necessary. But relying on that assumption is just a way to avoid solving the problem. And we've had the problem for the past 5 years. Nothing makes me think it's magically going to go away now. | * ''"if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken"'': Sure, if we were doing everything else right this wouldn't be necessary. But relying on that assumption is just a way to avoid solving the problem. And we've had the problem for the past 5 years. Nothing makes me think it's magically going to go away now. | ||
* ''"what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?"'': We won't know until we try. Even if it's only happening every three days, or weekly - it's still better than what we have now. | * ''"what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?"'': We won't know until we try. Even if it's only happening every three days, or weekly - it's still better than what we have now. | ||
---[[User:Wwoods|WillWoods]] 18:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | ---[[User:Wwoods|WillWoods]] 18:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:36, 15 June 2009
- Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?
---markmc
- "if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken": Sure, if we were doing everything else right this wouldn't be necessary. But relying on that assumption is just a way to avoid solving the problem. And we've had the problem for the past 5 years. Nothing makes me think it's magically going to go away now.
- "what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?": We won't know until we try. Even if it's only happening every three days, or weekly - it's still better than what we have now.
---WillWoods 18:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)