From Fedora Project Wiki
(Created page with 'vpnc might be added to this list - vpnc can be compiled with openssl support (which is massively useful). Presently that support is not compiled into the Fedora packages as it vi...') |
(mod_nss vs mod_ssl) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
vpnc might be added to this list - vpnc can be compiled with openssl support (which is massively useful). Presently that support is not compiled into the Fedora packages as it violates the openssl license, which is a major pain. Perhaps it could be ported to use nss, thus killing two birds with one stone? | vpnc might be added to this list - vpnc can be compiled with openssl support (which is massively useful). Presently that support is not compiled into the Fedora packages as it violates the openssl license, which is a major pain. Perhaps it could be ported to use nss, thus killing two birds with one stone? | ||
== Server Name Indication: mod_nss vs mod_ssl == | |||
NSS does not yet support SNI ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360421 upstream bug 360421]), but mod_ssl does ([https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443513 Fedora bug 443513]). I don't think mod_nss can be touted as viable replacement until this is addressed. --[[User:Ktdreyer|Ktdreyer]] 05:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:13, 27 September 2009
vpnc might be added to this list - vpnc can be compiled with openssl support (which is massively useful). Presently that support is not compiled into the Fedora packages as it violates the openssl license, which is a major pain. Perhaps it could be ported to use nss, thus killing two birds with one stone?
Server Name Indication: mod_nss vs mod_ssl
NSS does not yet support SNI (upstream bug 360421), but mod_ssl does (Fedora bug 443513). I don't think mod_nss can be touted as viable replacement until this is addressed. --Ktdreyer 05:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)