From Fedora Project Wiki
(Created page with '=Bugzilla Shim= ==Producer Concept== *Bugzilla cc's bzshim@fedoraproject.org for every component in the Fedora product *Sendmail forwards messages addressed to bzshim@fedorproj...') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Bugzilla cc's bzshim@fedoraproject.org for every component in the Fedora product | *Bugzilla cc's bzshim@fedoraproject.org for every component in the Fedora product | ||
* | *procmail runs the message processing script i.e. no pulling. | ||
*Shim processes data and formats it into an AMQP message | *Shim processes data and formats it into an AMQP message | ||
*Shim then sends message via a moksha producer under fedoraproject | *Shim then sends message via a moksha producer under org.fedoraproject.bugzilla | ||
==Consumer== | ==Consumer== | ||
Do we need a consumer for this? There was some thought that we could just send data out on the AMQP bus about things like changing a reviews state and then this consumer would then make the change. Is there any reason for not just having an XMLRPC call do this instead? | Do we need a consumer for this? There was some thought that we could just send data out on the AMQP bus about things like changing a reviews state and then this consumer would then make the change. Is there any reason for not just having an XMLRPC call do this instead? | ||
Revision as of 06:48, 7 December 2009
Bugzilla Shim
Producer Concept
- Bugzilla cc's bzshim@fedoraproject.org for every component in the Fedora product
- procmail runs the message processing script i.e. no pulling.
- Shim processes data and formats it into an AMQP message
- Shim then sends message via a moksha producer under org.fedoraproject.bugzilla
Consumer
Do we need a consumer for this? There was some thought that we could just send data out on the AMQP bus about things like changing a reviews state and then this consumer would then make the change. Is there any reason for not just having an XMLRPC call do this instead?