Revision as of 14:03, 14 December 2009

Attendees

Regrets:

adamw to offer some guidance on how to handle hardware/local_configuration specific bugs

INPROGRESS -- expect to have this cleaned up in the next day or so (see Fedora_12_QA_Retrospective#Recommendations).

What's next?

If defining policy in order to develop a test plan is not progress, perhaps changing focus to detection of policykit changes?

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 * adamw to offer some guidance on how to handle hardware/local_configuration specific bugs
-* adamw will reach out to FESCO for guidance on defining a security policy
+DONE -- see [[Blocker_Bug_FAQ#What_about_hardware_and_local_configuration_dependent_issues.3F]]
 * jlaska to post recommendations on F-12 QA retrospective
+INPROGRESS -- expect to have this cleaned up in the next day or so (see [[Fedora_12_QA_Retrospective#Recommendations]]).
 == Enhancing Release Criteria ==
+* See [[Fedora_Release_Criteria]]
+What's next?
 == Security Policy / Test Plan ==
-== Fedora 12 QA retrospective ==
+* Current status?
-* See announcement - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-November/msg01126.html
+If defining policy in order to develop a test plan is not progress, perhaps changing focus to detection of policykit changes?
-* See wiki page - [[Fedora_12_QA_Retrospective]]
 == AutoQA update ==
@@ Line 32: / Line 39: @@
 === Install automation ===
+* Proposal from [[User:Liam]] and [[User:Rhe]] out for review ... see [[Is_anaconda_broken_proposal]].
 == Open discussion - <Your topic here> ==