From Fedora Project Wiki
Sankarshan (talk | contribs) (tabulating foss.in09 feedback) |
Sankarshan (talk | contribs) (Minor formatting changes) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| Packaging SIG discussed queue priority long time ago, no further action taken | | Packaging SIG discussed queue priority long time ago, no further action taken | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |||
Please try and identify Action Items that are relevant with your feedback and, if possible take ownership. | '''Please try and identify Action Items that are relevant with your feedback and, if possible take ownership.''' | ||
Revision as of 05:58, 16 December 2009
Rahul Sundaram posted a mail to the fedora-india list aimed at gathering a feedback about the FOSS.IN 2009 presence of Fedora. The table below attempts to list out the salient points of the responses and, put some action items wherever possible.
| Name | Feedback | Action Item |
|---|---|---|
| Rahul Sundaram | meeting people works,more focus on presence and swag, list of easy tasks are important, current team is well-rounded but needs smaller task list for easy coaching, knowing and using Bugzilla keywords are important | |
| Susmit Shannigrahi | concern over absence of new faces, meeting people works, swag focus | |
| Aanjhan R | assess return on time/effort invested, investigate low PoTD attendance, how did current contributors begin, choose easier "upstreams" with local developers, expedite reviews for "First Time Packagers" | |
| Shakthi Kannan | creating awareness is important | |
| Kedar Sovani | workouts with specific small,easy tasks and goals are nice to have | |
| Steven Fernandez | delay in package review/packaging help is a turn-off | |
| Rakesh Pandit | Packaging SIG discussed queue priority long time ago, no further action taken |
Please try and identify Action Items that are relevant with your feedback and, if possible take ownership.