From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
(Ask about live-desktop vs live-base) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* I am going to let it trough, put please update it too the newest template too asap.. | * I am going to let it trough, put please update it too the newest template too asap.. | ||
* [[User:Bruno|Bruno]: The Spins SIG went over the wiki page and ks file and had another question/suggestion. We noticed that the ks includes the live-base ks and a bunch of desktop stuff instead on including the live-desktop ks. This appears to introduce extra maintenance outside of the main area of the spin and makes it less consistent with other desktop oriented spins. We were wondering if there was a particular reason you want to do things the way you have? |
Revision as of 21:39, 28 December 2009
Hi, maybe you ask yourself why I have refused your haskell spin.. so, the first think I have noticed is that you haven't a ISO Name / FS Label.
add that, and try again ;-)
kind regards, Bert Desmet
- sorry hadn't seen this comment until today... Petersen
but note this is only proposed for git/spin package...
- you have to update it again for fedora 13 :-(
but it looks promising now ;-)
- I am going to let it trough, put please update it too the newest template too asap..
- [[User:Bruno|Bruno]: The Spins SIG went over the wiki page and ks file and had another question/suggestion. We noticed that the ks includes the live-base ks and a bunch of desktop stuff instead on including the live-desktop ks. This appears to introduce extra maintenance outside of the main area of the spin and makes it less consistent with other desktop oriented spins. We were wondering if there was a particular reason you want to do things the way you have?