From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The Board has been working on defining a target audience for Fedora. In response to this, some people feel that Fedora should allow sub-groups to define their own target audience. Or even more strongly that Spins/SIGs should be the '''only''' groups defining target audience; in other words, the Board should not be defining one. An example mail supporting this position is [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2009-October/007430.html this mail] from Toshio. | The Board has been working on defining a target audience for Fedora. In response to this, some people feel that Fedora should allow sub-groups to define their own target audience. Or even more strongly that Spins/SIGs should be the '''only''' groups defining target audience; in other words, the Board should not be defining one. An example mail supporting this position is [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2009-October/007430.html this mail] from Toshio. | ||
However, the potential conflict between a Board target audience and a SIG target audience is still theoretical. | However, the potential conflict between a Board target audience and a SIG target audience is still theoretical. No SIG appears to have explicitly disagreed with the "working" target audience proposal. | ||
=== Possible Solutions === | === Possible Solutions === | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 1 February 2010
Can Spins/SIGS or Fedora remixes define their own target audience?
Background
The Board has been working on defining a target audience for Fedora. In response to this, some people feel that Fedora should allow sub-groups to define their own target audience. Or even more strongly that Spins/SIGs should be the only groups defining target audience; in other words, the Board should not be defining one. An example mail supporting this position is this mail from Toshio.
However, the potential conflict between a Board target audience and a SIG target audience is still theoretical. No SIG appears to have explicitly disagreed with the "working" target audience proposal.