(→security updates QA check: new section) |
(→critical path packages: new section) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Even if security updates don't follow Package update policy, we should make sure we check them at least after their release. | Even if security updates don't follow Package update policy, we should make sure we check them at least after their release. | ||
== critical path packages == | |||
Should [[Critical Path Packages Proposal|critical path packages]] be treated slightly differently from other packages? In what way? |
Revision as of 16:07, 18 February 2010
workflow more readable
Numbered list or some flow diagram could make the workflow section more readable. -- Kparal 13:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
mandatory or discretionary?
Let the policy be mandatory or discretionary? Can the package maintainer override the policy on will? -- Kparal 14:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
security updates QA check
Even if security updates don't follow Package update policy, we should make sure we check them at least after their release.
critical path packages
Should critical path packages be treated slightly differently from other packages? In what way?