From Fedora Project Wiki
(→Agenda) |
(Meeting summary) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Participants == | == Participants == | ||
* [[JaroslavReznik]] | * [[JaroslavReznik]] | ||
* [[KevinKofler]] | * [[KevinKofler]] | ||
| Line 15: | Line 13: | ||
* [[ThanNgo]] | * [[ThanNgo]] | ||
* [[User:Thomasj|ThomasJanssen]] | * [[User:Thomasj|ThomasJanssen]] | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| Line 32: | Line 29: | ||
== Transcript == | == Transcript == | ||
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-11/kde-sig.2010-05-11-14.02.html Meeting minutes] | |||
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-11/kde-sig.2010-05-11-14.02.log.html Full log] | |||
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010- | |||
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010- | |||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
The | '''KDE SC 4.4.3 status''' | ||
* kde-l10n needs respin and build | |||
* ''ACTION:'' ltinkl to respin and build kde-l10n and to prepare Bodhi update | |||
'''Duplicate menu entries''' | |||
* See [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591089], [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591093], [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591097] | |||
** Do we consider these bugs? | |||
** Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where upstream has them? | |||
** If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates? Or only in new releases? | |||
** Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks consider these release blockers. | |||
* ''AGREED:'' on Kevin Kofler's proposal - report upstream, follow upstream's decision, don't treat it as a release blocker | |||
'''Default install paths for apidocs''' | |||
* we are inconsistent in apidocs directories naming and location | |||
** soprano contains version, some apidocs are installed in doc/lib-apidocs/, some doc/HTML/en/lib-apidocs | |||
** we need consistent naming and common install location | |||
*** ''AGREED:'' apidocs not to be installed to version specific directories | |||
*** ''AGREED:'' on adapting to KDevelop needs, rdieter to check it | |||
* final decision postponed to next meeting | |||
== Comments == | == Comments == | ||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 11 May 2010
Meeting Time
- 2010-05-11 14:00 UTC
- #fedora-meeting on freenode
Participants
Agenda
- topics to discuss:
- Default install paths for apidocs
- Duplicate menu entries, e.g. #591089:
- Do we consider these bugs?
- Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where upstream has them?
- If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates? Or only in new releases?
- Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks consider these release blockers.
- KDE SC 4.4.3 status
- recent bugs:
- (none)
Transcript
Summary
KDE SC 4.4.3 status
- kde-l10n needs respin and build
- ACTION: ltinkl to respin and build kde-l10n and to prepare Bodhi update
Duplicate menu entries
- See [1], [2], [3]
- Do we consider these bugs?
- Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where upstream has them?
- If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates? Or only in new releases?
- Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks consider these release blockers.
- AGREED: on Kevin Kofler's proposal - report upstream, follow upstream's decision, don't treat it as a release blocker
Default install paths for apidocs
- we are inconsistent in apidocs directories naming and location
- soprano contains version, some apidocs are installed in doc/lib-apidocs/, some doc/HTML/en/lib-apidocs
- we need consistent naming and common install location
- AGREED: apidocs not to be installed to version specific directories
- AGREED: on adapting to KDevelop needs, rdieter to check it
- final decision postponed to next meeting