From Fedora Project Wiki

m (add to review template category)
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
[ ]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[ ]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[ ]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[ ]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[ ]  Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[ ]  Buildroot definition is not present
[ ]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines[3,4].
[ ]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines[3,4].
[ ]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[ ]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Line 32: Line 32:
[ ]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[ ]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[ ]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[ ]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[ ]  Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[ ]  Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[ ]  Package consistently uses macros.
[ ]  Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mixing)
[ ]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[ ]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[ ]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[ ]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Line 39: Line 39:
[ ]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]  Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage
[ ]  Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage
[ ]  Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[ ]  Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[ ]  Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[ ]  Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[ ]  Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
Line 45: Line 46:
[ ]  If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be removed prior to building
[ ]  If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be removed prior to building
[ ]  All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[ ]  All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[ ]  Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[ ]  If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant


=== Maven ===
=== Maven ===
Line 55: Line 58:
=== Other suggestions ===
=== Other suggestions ===
[ ]  If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[ ]  If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[ ]  Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} with %{_javadocdir}/%{name} symlink
[ ]  Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar with %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (unversioned) symlink
[ ]  If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant
[ ]  Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[ ]  Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[ ]  Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[ ]  Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
Line 87: Line 87:
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main
[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2  
[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2  
[6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Filenames
</pre>
</pre>


[[Category:Package Maintainers/Review Template]]
[[Category:Package Maintainers/Review Template]]

Revision as of 09:30, 19 November 2010

Following template can be used by reviewers to simplify their reviews of Java packages and by packagers to double-check they haven't forgotten something.

Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[ ]  Rpmlint output:
[ ]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[ ]  Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format %{name}.spec.
[ ]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[ ]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[ ]  Buildroot definition is not present
[ ]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines[3,4].
[ ]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:
[ ]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[ ]  All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[ ]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package    :
MD5SUM upstream package:
[ ]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[ ]  Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]  Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[ ]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[ ]  Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[ ]  Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mixing)
[ ]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[ ]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[ ]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]  Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage
[ ]  Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[ ]  Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[ ]  Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[ ]  Package uses %global not %define
[ ]  If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[ ]  If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be removed prior to building
[ ]  All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[ ]  Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[ ]  If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant

=== Maven ===
[ ]  Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[ ]  If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a comment
[ ]  If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=*" explain why it's needed in a comment
[ ]  Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[ ]  Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for %update_maven_depmap macro)

=== Other suggestions ===
[ ]  If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[ ]  Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[ ]  Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[ ]  Latest version is packaged.
[ ]  Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on:


=== Issues ===
1.

=== Final Notes ===
1.


================
*** APPROVED ***
================

or

================
*** REJECTED ***
================

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main
[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 
[6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Filenames