From Fedora Project Wiki
(Updated notes) |
m (Updated notes) |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
* The team conducted a *mini* review of 4 proposed blocker bugs ... | * The team conducted a *mini* review of 4 proposed blocker bugs ... | ||
*# {{bz|704726}} - {{package|gnome-desktop3}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-desktop | *# {{bz|704726}} - {{package|gnome-desktop3}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-desktop | ||
*#* AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism | |||
*# {{bz|704727}} - {{package|gnome-themes-standard}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-themes | *# {{bz|704727}} - {{package|gnome-themes-standard}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-themes | ||
*#* AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism | |||
*# {{bz|704729}} - {{package|gobject-introspection}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with dbus-glib | *# {{bz|704729}} - {{package|gobject-introspection}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with dbus-glib | ||
*#* AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism | |||
*# {{bz|704728}} - {{package|polkit}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with polkit-desktop-policy | *# {{bz|704728}} - {{package|polkit}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with polkit-desktop-policy | ||
*#* AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism | |||
* And 3 proposed NTH bugs ... | * And 3 proposed NTH bugs ... | ||
*# {{bz|704188}} - {{package|anaconda}} - TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable | *# {{bz|704188}} - {{package|anaconda}} - TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable | ||
*#* AGREED: AcceptedNTH | |||
*# {{bz|704020}} - {{package|gnome-panel}} - libpanel_applet changed ABI; not all applets ported | *# {{bz|704020}} - {{package|gnome-panel}} - libpanel_applet changed ABI; not all applets ported | ||
*#* AGREED: RejectedNTH - Yum upgrades not officially supported, day-0 update acceptable. | |||
*# {{bz|703944}} - {{package|pfstools}} - pfstools-octave has broken dependencies. | *# {{bz|703944}} - {{package|pfstools}} - pfstools-octave has broken dependencies. | ||
*#* AGREED: RejectedNTH - Yum upgrades not officially supported, day-0 update acceptable. | |||
== AutoQA update == | == AutoQA update == |
Revision as of 16:25, 16 May 2011
Attendees
People present (lines said):
- jlaska (151)
- adamw (56)
- kparal (28)
- j_dulaney (21)
- brunowolff (16)
- tflink (14)
- vhumpa (12)
- pbrobinson (9)
- jsmith (5)
- Southern_Gentlem (4)
- rbergeron (3)
- satellit_ (3)
- fenrus02 (1)
- elad661 (1)
- Viking-Ice (1)
- msavy (1)
Unable to attend:
Agenda
Previous meeting follow-up
- tflink to follow-up with cloud sig for test day recap
- mgoldmann or msavy will follow-up this week (conferences previous 2 weeks)
- jlaska to follow-up w/ halfline on bug#702650, kparal+jlaska to verify
- Appears to be tested and resolved, thanks kparal and halfline
- adamw proposing patch for bug#697834
- Done ... AcceptedNTH and available for walters if desired
- jlaska - file proposed NTH bugs for F14->F15
- Done
F-15-Final-RC3 status
- STATUS: INPROGRESS - Tuesday, May 17
- Continue to monitor for blocker bugs at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
- Thank you Robatino for the RC3 announcement and wiki management
- Robatino already created Final RC1 QA wiki pages at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_15_Final_RC_Test_Results
- The team conducted a *mini* review of 4 proposed blocker bugs ...
- RHBZ #704726 -
gnome-desktop3
- upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-desktop- AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
- RHBZ #704727 -
gnome-themes-standard
- upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-themes- AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
- RHBZ #704729 -
gobject-introspection
- upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with dbus-glib- AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
- RHBZ #704728 -
polkit
- upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with polkit-desktop-policy- AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
- RHBZ #704726 -
- And 3 proposed NTH bugs ...
- RHBZ #704188 -
anaconda
- TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable- AGREED: AcceptedNTH
- RHBZ #704020 -
gnome-panel
- libpanel_applet changed ABI; not all applets ported- AGREED: RejectedNTH - Yum upgrades not officially supported, day-0 update acceptable.
- RHBZ #703944 -
pfstools
- pfstools-octave has broken dependencies.- AGREED: RejectedNTH - Yum upgrades not officially supported, day-0 update acceptable.
- RHBZ #704188 -
AutoQA update
- kparal implemented package caching in AutoQA (optional, default off). When enabled, it drastically speeds up mainly depcheck runs.
- jskladan introduced an algorithm to filter interesting information from depcheck log about why a particular package has broken dependencies
- we started to nicely document our test cases. First piece is upgradepath (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_tests/Upgradepath)
- tflink worked on issue of yum getting stuck in a loop that generated huge depcheck logs. When new yum builds land in stable repos, we should be have that handled. Tflink also noted the updates are still in 'updates-testing', pending additional positive karma.
- vhumpa created a pretty text template for our future test reports (see http://vhumpa.fedorapeople.org/prettylog_upgradepath_example2.txt)
- Jlaska reported that the log size issue appears under control. Compressing logs > 100M every 2 hours
Upcoming QA events
- Tuesday, May 17 - Go/NoGo meeting
- Tuesday, May 24 - Final (GA) release