From Fedora Project Wiki

< QA‎ | Meetings

(Updated notes)
m (Updated notes)
Line 46: Line 46:
* The team conducted a *mini* review of 4 proposed blocker bugs ...
* The team conducted a *mini* review of 4 proposed blocker bugs ...
*# {{bz|704726}} - {{package|gnome-desktop3}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-desktop
*# {{bz|704726}} - {{package|gnome-desktop3}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-desktop
*#* AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
*# {{bz|704727}} - {{package|gnome-themes-standard}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-themes
*# {{bz|704727}} - {{package|gnome-themes-standard}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-themes
*#* AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
*# {{bz|704729}} - {{package|gobject-introspection}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with dbus-glib
*# {{bz|704729}} - {{package|gobject-introspection}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with dbus-glib
*#* AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
*# {{bz|704728}} - {{package|polkit}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with polkit-desktop-policy
*# {{bz|704728}} - {{package|polkit}} - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with polkit-desktop-policy
*#* AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
* And 3 proposed NTH bugs ...
* And 3 proposed NTH bugs ...
*# {{bz|704188}} - {{package|anaconda}} - TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
*# {{bz|704188}} - {{package|anaconda}} - TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
*#* AGREED: AcceptedNTH
*# {{bz|704020}} - {{package|gnome-panel}} - libpanel_applet changed ABI; not all applets ported
*# {{bz|704020}} - {{package|gnome-panel}} - libpanel_applet changed ABI; not all applets ported
*#* AGREED: RejectedNTH - Yum upgrades not officially supported, day-0 update acceptable.
*# {{bz|703944}} - {{package|pfstools}} - pfstools-octave has broken dependencies.
*# {{bz|703944}} - {{package|pfstools}} - pfstools-octave has broken dependencies.
*#* AGREED: RejectedNTH - Yum upgrades not officially supported, day-0 update acceptable.


== AutoQA update ==
== AutoQA update ==

Revision as of 16:25, 16 May 2011

Attendees

People present (lines said):

  1. jlaska (151)
  2. adamw (56)
  3. kparal (28)
  4. j_dulaney (21)
  5. brunowolff (16)
  6. tflink (14)
  7. vhumpa (12)
  8. pbrobinson (9)
  9. jsmith (5)
  10. Southern_Gentlem (4)
  11. rbergeron (3)
  12. satellit_ (3)
  13. fenrus02 (1)
  14. elad661 (1)
  15. Viking-Ice (1)
  16. msavy (1)

Unable to attend:

  1. Rhe (hopefully sleeping)
  2. Hongqing (hopefully sleeping)
  3. wutao85 (hopefully sleeping)
  4. jskladan

Agenda

Previous meeting follow-up

  1. tflink to follow-up with cloud sig for test day recap
    • mgoldmann or msavy will follow-up this week (conferences previous 2 weeks)
  2. jlaska to follow-up w/ halfline on bug#702650, kparal+jlaska to verify
    • Appears to be tested and resolved, thanks kparal and halfline
  3. adamw proposing patch for bug#697834
    • Done ... AcceptedNTH and available for walters if desired
  4. jlaska - file proposed NTH bugs for F14->F15
    • Done

F-15-Final-RC3 status

  • STATUS: INPROGRESS - Tuesday, May 17
  • Continue to monitor for blocker bugs at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
  • Thank you Robatino for the RC3 announcement and wiki management
  • Robatino already created Final RC1 QA wiki pages at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_15_Final_RC_Test_Results
  • The team conducted a *mini* review of 4 proposed blocker bugs ...
    1. RHBZ #704726 - gnome-desktop3 - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-desktop
      • AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
    2. RHBZ #704727 - gnome-themes-standard - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with gnome-themes
      • AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
    3. RHBZ #704729 - gobject-introspection - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with dbus-glib
      • AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
    4. RHBZ #704728 - polkit - upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with polkit-desktop-policy
      • AGREED: tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism
  • And 3 proposed NTH bugs ...
    1. RHBZ #704188 - anaconda - TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
      • AGREED: AcceptedNTH
    2. RHBZ #704020 - gnome-panel - libpanel_applet changed ABI; not all applets ported
      • AGREED: RejectedNTH - Yum upgrades not officially supported, day-0 update acceptable.
    3. RHBZ #703944 - pfstools - pfstools-octave has broken dependencies.
      • AGREED: RejectedNTH - Yum upgrades not officially supported, day-0 update acceptable.

AutoQA update

  • kparal implemented package caching in AutoQA (optional, default off). When enabled, it drastically speeds up mainly depcheck runs.
  • jskladan introduced an algorithm to filter interesting information from depcheck log about why a particular package has broken dependencies
  • we started to nicely document our test cases. First piece is upgradepath (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_tests/Upgradepath)
  • tflink worked on issue of yum getting stuck in a loop that generated huge depcheck logs. When new yum builds land in stable repos, we should be have that handled. Tflink also noted the updates are still in 'updates-testing', pending additional positive karma.
  • vhumpa created a pretty text template for our future test reports (see http://vhumpa.fedorapeople.org/prettylog_upgradepath_example2.txt)
  • Jlaska reported that the log size issue appears under control. Compressing logs > 100M every 2 hours

Upcoming QA events

  1. Tuesday, May 17 - Go/NoGo meeting
  2. Tuesday, May 24 - Final (GA) release

Open Discussion - <your topic here>

Action items

IRC Log