mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
|Depends on {{bz|708842}} | |Depends on {{bz|708842}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
|jboss-parent | |||
|6.0.1.beta2 | |||
|org.jboss:jboss-parent | |||
|[https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/service/local/repositories/releases/content/org/jboss/jboss-parent/6/jboss-parent-6.pom POM] | |||
|{{bz|711350}} | |||
|[[User:Goldmann|goldmann]] | |||
|'''<span style="color:orange">Waiting for review</span> ''' | |||
|Needs update to 6.0. | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 08:06, 15 July 2011
This wiki page shows the progress of including JBoss AS 7.
People involved
Below is the list of currently involved people in the process.
Name | IRC | Current work | Additional info |
---|---|---|---|
Marek Goldmann | mgoldmann | Doing the dirty work of preparing jars to be packaged. See Current approach section for more info. | UTC+2 |
Current approach
The idea is to package minimal set of JAR's. This means that only core JARs required to run or build AS7 will be packaged. This will let us package AS7 in reasonable timeframe. All additional JARs can be added later, for example to improve/enable test execution.
I am (Marek Goldmann) now using following approach to select what needs to be packaged and what not:
- Create a spec file.
- Try to build the package.
- Failure - see what what was the cause and:
- Missing dependency? Comment it out and build.
- Success - cool!
- Failure - go to beginning and start with that dependency.
- Issue in code? Create a patch.
- Missing dependency? Comment it out and build.
- Success - add spec file to queue for cleanup!
- Failure - see what what was the cause and:
Cleanup queue
In cleanup queue you can find packages that are building fine, but the spec files needs cleanup. Cleanup can include (but is not limited to):
- License, description, url, name, version, changelog are correct.
- Make sure the spec files is following additional rules.
After cleanup - package can be submitted to Fedora.
Additionally to Java packaging rules - please meet following instructions for JBoss-related packages, like jboss-dmr, jboss-logging and so on:
- JARs should be installed in
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/jboss
- POM files should be installed in
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mavenpomdir}/JPP.jboss-%{name}.pom
- Use
%add_maven_depmap
macro. It should look similar to this:
%add_maven_depmap JPP.jboss-%{name}.pom jboss/%{name}.jar
We need your help!
Feel free to grab dependency you want to package and add you to the list. You can talk to us on #fedora-java IRC or using mailing list.
Current progress
Table below shows what is officially submitted to Fedora (after creating review request). This is not the cleanup queue content.
Package | Version | Maven groupID:artifactId | POM | Review request | Packager | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
hibernate-commons-annotations | 3.2.0 | org.hibernate:hibernate-commons-annotations | POM | RHBZ #706832 | goldmann | In Rawhide | |
hibernate-jpa-2.0-api | 1.0.0 | org.hibernate.javax.persistence:hibernate-jpa-2.0-api | POM | RHBZ #706846 | goldmann | In review | License status cleaned up |
fusesource-pom | 1.5 | org.fusesource:fusesource-pom | POM | RHBZ #708645 | goldmann | In Rawhide | |
hawtjni | 1.1 | org.fusesource.hawtjni:hawtjni* | Parent POM | RHBZ #708670 | goldmann | In Rawhide | Depends on |
jansi-native | 1.1 | org.fusesource.jansi:jansi-native | POM | RHBZ #708836 | goldmann | In review | Depends on |
jansi | 1.5 | org.fusesource.jansi:jansi | POM | RHBZ #708842 | goldmann | Waiting for review | Depends on |
gossip | 1.7 | org.sonatype.gossip:gossip* | POM | RHBZ #709051 | goldmann | Waiting for review | Depends on RHBZ #708842 |
jline2 | 2.5 | org.sonatype.jline:jline | POM | RHBZ #709300 | goldmann | Waiting for review | Depends on RHBZ #708842 |
jboss-parent | 6.0.1.beta2 | org.jboss:jboss-parent | POM | RHBZ #711350 | goldmann | Waiting for review | Needs update to 6.0. |
Status legend
Status | Meaning |
---|---|
Issue | Package encountered a serious issue while packaging (license, etc) - see Comments field for more info |
In review | Package is submitted for review and being reviewed by someone |
After review, waiting for SCM | Package passed review and packages is waiting for creating git repo in Fedora for this package |
In Rawhide | Package is available in Rawhide |