No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Is there a contingency plan for severe security issues or bugs in the rescue-mode kernel or in the rescue tools? Theoretically that won't be used in a situation where the system is accessible for attack in rescue mode, but it might be good to have a plan for updating it if need be. --[[User:Mattdm|Mattdm]] ([[User talk:Mattdm|talk]]) 19:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:10, 6 February 2013
Could we have a paragraph documenting how this might impact KVM and Xen guests in typical configurations? Even if the answer is "it's no problem"? --Mattdm (talk) 19:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Also, how big is that rescue image going to be, and will it be optional? --Mattdm (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Is there a contingency plan for severe security issues or bugs in the rescue-mode kernel or in the rescue tools? Theoretically that won't be used in a situation where the system is accessible for attack in rescue mode, but it might be good to have a plan for updating it if need be. --Mattdm (talk) 19:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC)