From Fedora Project Wiki
m (moved Talk:/Updates Policy to Talk:Updates Policy: stupid /) |
(→EPEL policy: new section) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* [[User:Bruno|Bruno:]] Should the "Beta to Release" section be named "Beta to Pre Release"? | * [[User:Bruno|Bruno:]] Should the "Beta to Release" section be named "Beta to Pre Release"? | ||
** [[User:Kevin|Kevin:]] Yep. Done. thanks. | ** [[User:Kevin|Kevin:]] Yep. Done. thanks. | ||
== EPEL policy == | |||
Section 4.3, [[Updates_Policy#All_other_updates]], says packages must spend one week in updates-testing before being eligible for release to stable. | |||
EPEL policy appears to be different, perhaps two weeks instead. Is this documented somewhere that I'm missing? |
Latest revision as of 18:38, 16 May 2013
- Bruno: "Use a seperate buildsystem tag" should probably have a link to instructions on how one does that.
- Kevin: I added a link to rel-eng trac. There doesn't seem to be a SOP yet for this.
- Bruno: I thought I wrote something about this up somewhere and had Jesse review it. I'll find it; then you can decide if that's a better reference or not.
- See if you like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo#Requesting_special_dist_tags
- Kevin: I added a link to rel-eng trac. There doesn't seem to be a SOP yet for this.
- Bruno: In the pre-beta section I'd like to see a stronger recommendation against breakage and soname bumps shortly before alpha, since that tends to break spin builds and we'd like to have good, current ones at the time of the alpha release.
- Bruno: Should the "Beta to Release" section be named "Beta to Pre Release"?
- Kevin: Yep. Done. thanks.
EPEL policy
Section 4.3, Updates_Policy#All_other_updates, says packages must spend one week in updates-testing before being eligible for release to stable.
EPEL policy appears to be different, perhaps two weeks instead. Is this documented somewhere that I'm missing?