From Fedora Project Wiki
(create initial page for 06-03 meeting) |
(update page with the results of the meeting) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Attendees = | = Attendees = | ||
* adamw (65) | |||
* kparal (19) | |||
* mjg59 (12) | |||
* jreznik (11) | |||
* tflink (9) | |||
* brunowolff (5) | |||
* zodbot (5) | |||
* j_dulaney (3) | |||
* satellit (3) | |||
* jskladan (1) | |||
* nirik (1) | |||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
Line 8: | Line 19: | ||
== Previous meeting follow-up == | == Previous meeting follow-up == | ||
* ''adamw and anyone else to work on updating [[Common_F19_bugs]]'' | * ''adamw and anyone else to work on updating [[Common_F19_bugs]]'' - this was done, page is up to date for Beta | ||
* ''adamw to talk to rbergeron and make sure packagekit/policykit issue makes it into the beta release notes'' | * ''adamw to talk to rbergeron and make sure packagekit/policykit issue makes it into the beta release notes'' - this was done, issue was called out in the release announcement, slashdot has not crucified us | ||
* ''adamw to complete 'new model' criteria revision by converting the final criteria'' | * ''adamw to complete 'new model' criteria revision by converting the final criteria'' - this is currently in progress, aimed to be complete by Wednesday's blocker review meeting | ||
* ''tflink to update the iscsi test case for newUI'' | * ''tflink to update the iscsi test case for newUI'' - not done yet, but planned soon | ||
* ''tflink to schedule first blocker review meeting for this week'' | * ''tflink to schedule first blocker review meeting for this week'' - this was done, the meeting went ahead | ||
* ''adamw to look at extracting some test cases from [[Test_Day:2013-05-21_AnacondaNewUI_Followup]] for use as optional test cases (or even enforceable partitioning test cases) for the validation matrices'' | * ''adamw to look at extracting some test cases from [[Test_Day:2013-05-21_AnacondaNewUI_Followup]] for use as optional test cases (or even enforceable partitioning test cases) for the validation matrices'' - not done yet, but more of a long-term goal for F20 | ||
* ''martix to ensure spice test day is ready on time'' | * ''martix to ensure spice test day is ready on time'' - it was ready and went ahead fine | ||
* ''satellit_e to work on some test cases for SoaS'' | * ''satellit_e to work on some test cases for SoaS'' - an initial plan is [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_19-sugar_test_cases available] | ||
== Fedora 19 Final planning == | == Fedora 19 Final planning == | ||
* | * TC1 was due 2013-06-04, adamw would ensure it got composed | ||
* | * mjg59 informed us a kernel patch is coming which ought to resolve most of the UEFI variable space issues; it should be included in TC1 | ||
== Test Days == | == Test Days == | ||
* [[Test_Day:2013-05-28_Virtualization]] | * [[Test_Day:2013-05-28_Virtualization]] and [[Test_Day:2013-05-30_Spice]] both went off quite successfully, we saw testing and developer feedback in both | ||
* [[Test_Day:2013-06-04_Network_Manager]] and [[Test_Day:2013-06-06_FreeIPA_Two_Factor_Authentication]] both looked ready to go, kparal was working on a live image for NM test day | |||
* [[Test_Day:2013-06-04_Network_Manager]] | |||
== Open floor == | == Open floor == | ||
== Action items == | == Action items == | ||
* adamw to mark LLVMpipe-without-SSE2 bug as needing a release note and explain why to docs team | |||
== IRC Log == | == IRC Log == | ||
{| | |||
|- id="t15:00:50" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #startmeeting Fedora QA meeting | |||
|| [[#t15:00:50|15:00]] | |||
|- id="t15:00:50" | |||
! style="background-color: #42427e" | zodbot | |||
| style="color: #42427e" | Meeting started Mon Jun 3 15:00:50 2013 UTC. The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |||
|| [[#t15:00:50|15:00]] | |||
|- id="t15:00:50" | |||
! style="background-color: #42427e" | zodbot | |||
| style="color: #42427e" | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. | |||
|| [[#t15:00:50|15:00]] | |||
|- id="t15:00:53" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #meetingname fedora-qa | |||
|| [[#t15:00:53|15:00]] | |||
|- id="t15:00:53" | |||
! style="background-color: #42427e" | zodbot | |||
| style="color: #42427e" | The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' | |||
|| [[#t15:00:53|15:00]] | |||
|- id="t15:00:56" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #topic Roll call | |||
|| [[#t15:00:56|15:00]] | |||
|- id="t15:01:07" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | morning folks, who's ready for fun? | |||
|| [[#t15:01:07|15:01]] | |||
|- id="t15:01:21" | |||
| colspan="2" | * jreznik is ready for another meeting in a row | |||
|| [[#t15:01:21|15:01]] | |||
|- id="t15:01:27" | |||
| colspan="2" | * jskladan tips his hat | |||
|| [[#t15:01:27|15:01]] | |||
|- id="t15:01:38" | |||
| colspan="2" | * j_dulaney lurks | |||
|| [[#t15:01:38|15:01]] | |||
|- id="t15:01:39" | |||
| colspan="2" | * satellit listening in Bellingham motel | |||
|| [[#t15:01:39|15:01]] | |||
|- id="t15:01:49" | |||
! style="background-color: #818144" | tflink | |||
| style="color: #818144" | jreznik: /me is here | |||
|| [[#t15:01:49|15:01]] | |||
|- id="t15:02:15" | |||
! style="background-color: #818144" | tflink | |||
| style="color: #818144" | huh, that didn't work | |||
|| [[#t15:02:15|15:02]] | |||
|- id="t15:02:30" | |||
| colspan="2" | * kparal here | |||
|| [[#t15:02:30|15:02]] | |||
|- id="t15:04:11" | |||
| colspan="2" | * brunowolff is here | |||
|| [[#t15:04:11|15:04]] | |||
|- id="t15:04:11" | |||
| colspan="2" | * nirik is lurking as well | |||
|| [[#t15:04:11|15:04]] | |||
|- id="t15:05:20" | |||
| colspan="2" | * adamw really needs to get that anti-lurking kit installed | |||
|| [[#t15:05:20|15:05]] | |||
|- id="t15:05:45" | |||
| colspan="2" | * jreznik is working on an announcement for the devel-announce list, needs anti-lurking kit as he's more lurking now :) | |||
|| [[#t15:05:45|15:05]] | |||
|- id="t15:06:17" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #topic previous meeting follow-up | |||
|| [[#t15:06:17|15:06]] | |||
|- id="t15:07:00" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info "adamw and anyone else to work on updating Common_F19_bugs" - I got that one done, it's pretty much up to date | |||
|| [[#t15:07:00|15:07]] | |||
|- id="t15:07:24" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info "adamw to talk to rbergeron and make sure packagekit/policykit issue makes it into the beta release notes" - yup, got a mention of it into the release announcement, and no crazy slashdot conspiracy theories yet | |||
|| [[#t15:07:24|15:07]] | |||
|- id="t15:07:51" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info "adamw to complete 'new model' criteria revision by converting the final criteria" - I started working on that Friday, I'll aim to complete it today or tomorrow | |||
|| [[#t15:07:51|15:07]] | |||
|- id="t15:08:02" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | "tflink to update the iscsi test case for newUI" - tflink? | |||
|| [[#t15:08:02|15:08]] | |||
|- id="t15:08:13" | |||
! style="background-color: #818144" | tflink | |||
| style="color: #818144" | not done yet, on my todo list for today | |||
|| [[#t15:08:13|15:08]] | |||
|- id="t15:09:31" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | .fire tflink first of the week | |||
|| [[#t15:09:31|15:09]] | |||
|- id="t15:09:34" | |||
! style="background-color: #42427e" | zodbot | |||
| style="color: #42427e" | adamw fires tflink first of the week | |||
|| [[#t15:09:34|15:09]] | |||
|- id="t15:09:34" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | aw, no bot in here? boo. | |||
|| [[#t15:09:34|15:09]] | |||
|- id="t15:09:37" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | yay! | |||
|| [[#t15:09:37|15:09]] | |||
|- id="t15:09:58" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info "tflink to update the iscsi test case for newUI" - not done yet but should be soon | |||
|| [[#t15:09:58|15:09]] | |||
|- id="t15:10:12" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info "tflink to schedule first blocker review meeting for this week" - that was done, we had two review meetings last week | |||
|| [[#t15:10:12|15:10]] | |||
|- id="t15:10:28" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info "adamw to look at extracting some test cases from Test_Day:2013-05-21_AnacondaNewUI_Followup for use as optional test cases (or even enforceable partitioning test cases) for the validation matrices" - not done yet but it's kind of a long-term plan, it's on my todo list | |||
|| [[#t15:10:28|15:10]] | |||
|- id="t15:10:57" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info "martix to ensure spice test day is ready on time" - that seemed to be sorted out fine | |||
|| [[#t15:10:57|15:10]] | |||
|- id="t15:11:58" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info "satellit_e to work on some test cases for SoaS" - satellit drafted up some ideas at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_19-sugar_test_cases | |||
|| [[#t15:11:58|15:11]] | |||
|- id="t15:12:01" | |||
! style="background-color: #854685" | satellit | |||
| style="color: #854685" | SoaS test cases? list of ideas http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_19-sugar_test_cases | |||
|| [[#t15:12:01|15:12]] | |||
|- id="t15:12:07" | |||
! style="background-color: #854685" | satellit | |||
| style="color: #854685" | : ) | |||
|| [[#t15:12:07|15:12]] | |||
|- id="t15:12:13" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | :) | |||
|| [[#t15:12:13|15:12]] | |||
|- id="t15:12:20" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | sorry i didn't get a sec to review them yet, i'll do it today | |||
|| [[#t15:12:20|15:12]] | |||
|- id="t15:12:27" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | any other follow-up items I missed? | |||
|| [[#t15:12:27|15:12]] | |||
|- id="t15:13:49" | |||
! style="background-color: #488888" | brunowolff | |||
| style="color: #488888" | I retested llvmpipe on a particular non-SSE2 CPU and it's still broken. | |||
|| [[#t15:13:49|15:13]] | |||
|- id="t15:16:05" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | ah yeah I saw your comment | |||
|| [[#t15:16:05|15:16]] | |||
|- id="t15:16:25" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | that's a bit of a pain. and you might be right about advising people with old machines to grab something other than GNOME | |||
|| [[#t15:16:25|15:16]] | |||
|- id="t15:16:34" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | we could probably mark the bug as requiring a release note for that | |||
|| [[#t15:16:34|15:16]] | |||
|- id="t15:17:03" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #action adamw to mark LLVMpipe-without-SSE2 bug as needing a release note and explain why to docs team | |||
|| [[#t15:17:03|15:17]] | |||
|- id="t15:19:56" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #topic Fedora 19 Final planning | |||
|| [[#t15:19:56|15:19]] | |||
|- id="t15:20:08" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info TC1 is due tomorrow, 2013-06-04, I will request the compose then | |||
|| [[#t15:20:08|15:20]] | |||
|- id="t15:20:23" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | do we have any major worries at this point, or things we need to get in place soon? | |||
|| [[#t15:20:23|15:20]] | |||
|- id="t15:20:38" | |||
| colspan="2" | * adamw can't think of anything urgent beyond the revised criteria | |||
|| [[#t15:20:38|15:20]] | |||
|- id="t15:21:05" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | the sooner we have TC1 the better. let's request today :) | |||
|| [[#t15:21:05|15:21]] | |||
|- id="t15:21:30" | |||
! style="background-color: #818144" | tflink | |||
| style="color: #818144" | have we done much upgrade testing? I've seen several comments and bugs, but wasn't sure how much poking has been done so far | |||
|| [[#t15:21:30|15:21]] | |||
|- id="t15:21:37" | |||
| colspan="2" | * jreznik would not be against requesting it sooner, if there's nothing we really want in tc1 | |||
|| [[#t15:21:37|15:21]] | |||
|- id="t15:21:47" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | I did some upgrade testing on UEFI | |||
|| [[#t15:21:47|15:21]] | |||
|- id="t15:22:10" | |||
! style="background-color: #4b904b" | jreznik | |||
| style="color: #4b904b" | poor kparal touching UEFI | |||
|| [[#t15:22:10|15:22]] | |||
|- id="t15:23:20" | |||
| colspan="2" | * kparal now has a master's degree in bios re-flashing | |||
|| [[#t15:23:20|15:23]] | |||
|- id="t15:24:08" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | tflink: quite a few people have run fedup I think, and we did fill the matrix for beta | |||
|| [[#t15:24:08|15:24]] | |||
|- id="t15:24:10" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | kparal: :) | |||
|| [[#t15:24:10|15:24]] | |||
|- id="t15:24:38" | |||
! style="background-color: #818144" | tflink | |||
| style="color: #818144" | adamw: yeah, I was just thinking about the less-straightforward configs that ended up causing trouble after F18 release | |||
|| [[#t15:24:38|15:24]] | |||
|- id="t15:25:55" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | adamw: We should finally have a patch that resolves most of the UEFI variable issues | |||
|| [[#t15:25:55|15:25]] | |||
|- id="t15:26:03" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | right, that's another area we could do with more test cases | |||
|| [[#t15:26:03|15:26]] | |||
|- id="t15:26:11" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | mjg59: yay! so there _were_ still issues on the kenrel side? | |||
|| [[#t15:26:11|15:26]] | |||
|- id="t15:26:18" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | what's the timeframe on landing that? | |||
|| [[#t15:26:18|15:26]] | |||
|- id="t15:26:29" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | adamw: Well, no. Issues on the firmware side. | |||
|| [[#t15:26:29|15:26]] | |||
|- id="t15:26:44" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | mjg59: what are the changes? | |||
|| [[#t15:26:44|15:26]] | |||
|- id="t15:26:53" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | But I have finally come up with an elegant mechanism for making the damn things do what we want | |||
|| [[#t15:26:53|15:26]] | |||
|- id="t15:26:55" | |||
! style="background-color: #4b904b" | jreznik | |||
| style="color: #4b904b" | mjg59: and how much you can do with fw side? | |||
|| [[#t15:26:55|15:26]] | |||
|- id="t15:27:08" | |||
! style="background-color: #4b904b" | jreznik | |||
| style="color: #4b904b" | mjg59: nice to hear! | |||
|| [[#t15:27:08|15:27]] | |||
|- id="t15:27:17" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | kparal: Change the threshold from 50% to 5KB, do something magic which will (in theory) force the firmware to trigger garbage collection | |||
|| [[#t15:27:17|15:27]] | |||
|- id="t15:27:37" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | mjg59: sounds good. can we expect a blogpost about the details? | |||
|| [[#t15:27:37|15:27]] | |||
|- id="t15:27:49" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | kparal: http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/25091.html | |||
|| [[#t15:27:49|15:27]] | |||
|- id="t15:27:54" | |||
! style="background-color: #4b904b" | jreznik | |||
| style="color: #4b904b" | mjg59: what do you achieve by changing 50% to 5 KB? | |||
|| [[#t15:27:54|15:27]] | |||
|- id="t15:28:02" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | mjg59: thanks! | |||
|| [[#t15:28:02|15:28]] | |||
|- id="t15:29:08" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | jreznik: It's less than the maximum variable size, so we can create a new variable that's larger than the remaining space | |||
|| [[#t15:29:08|15:29]] | |||
|- id="t15:29:13" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | Or, rather, attempt to | |||
|| [[#t15:29:13|15:29]] | |||
|- id="t15:29:42" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | mjg59: does it mean that kernel panics will never again be stored in uefi nvram, too risky? | |||
|| [[#t15:29:42|15:29]] | |||
|- id="t15:29:43" | |||
| colspan="2" | * jreznik is reading the blog post | |||
|| [[#t15:29:43|15:29]] | |||
|- id="t15:29:56" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | kparal: No, we should be safe in doing that | |||
|| [[#t15:29:56|15:29]] | |||
|- id="t15:29:59" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | mjg59: any news on the timeframe? | |||
|| [[#t15:29:59|15:29]] | |||
|- id="t15:30:13" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | adamw: It's on LKML, jwb has a scratch build | |||
|| [[#t15:30:13|15:30]] | |||
|- id="t15:30:46" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | kparal: That's currently disabled because it turns out the code is shit (which may be, uh, my fault) | |||
|| [[#t15:30:46|15:30]] | |||
|- id="t15:31:08" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | mjg59: well, I mean, getting it in an official f19 kernel build | |||
|| [[#t15:31:08|15:31]] | |||
|- id="t15:31:55" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | adamw: Once we've got confirmation from some testing of the scratch build | |||
|| [[#t15:31:55|15:31]] | |||
|- id="t15:32:15" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | kparal: hint hint :) | |||
|| [[#t15:32:15|15:32]] | |||
|- id="t15:32:16" | |||
! style="background-color: #4b904b" | jreznik | |||
| style="color: #4b904b" | kparal: hint, hint ^^^ | |||
|| [[#t15:32:16|15:32]] | |||
|- id="t15:32:24" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | thanks guys | |||
|| [[#t15:32:24|15:32]] | |||
|- id="t15:32:27" | |||
! style="background-color: #4b904b" | jreznik | |||
| style="color: #4b904b" | adamw: hey, you were faster! | |||
|| [[#t15:32:27|15:32]] | |||
|- id="t15:32:30" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | .fire jreznik there can be only one | |||
|| [[#t15:32:30|15:32]] | |||
|- id="t15:32:30" | |||
! style="background-color: #42427e" | zodbot | |||
| style="color: #42427e" | adamw fires jreznik there can be only one | |||
|| [[#t15:32:30|15:32]] | |||
|- id="t15:32:50" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | mjg59: can you give us a link to that scratch build? | |||
|| [[#t15:32:50|15:32]] | |||
|- id="t15:33:00" | |||
! style="background-color: #4d4d93" | mjg59 | |||
| style="color: #4d4d93" | Linked from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964335 | |||
|| [[#t15:33:00|15:33]] | |||
|- id="t15:33:06" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info mjg59 informs us a kernel patch is coming which ought to resolve most of the UEFI variable space issues. scratch build for testing linked from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964335 | |||
|| [[#t15:33:06|15:33]] | |||
|- id="t15:33:30" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | thanks matt! | |||
|| [[#t15:33:30|15:33]] | |||
|- id="t15:33:31" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | I'll try to understand the blogpost and then test the build | |||
|| [[#t15:33:31|15:33]] | |||
|- id="t15:34:47" | |||
| colspan="2" | * jreznik thinks he understands what mjg59 wants to achieve, hopes firmwares will be cooperative :) | |||
|| [[#t15:34:47|15:34]] | |||
|- id="t15:34:54" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #topic Test Days | |||
|| [[#t15:34:54|15:34]] | |||
|- id="t15:35:47" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-05-28_Virtualization and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-05-30_Spice both went off pretty successfully last week, i saw lots of active testing on both | |||
|| [[#t15:35:47|15:35]] | |||
|- id="t15:36:11" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | although - kparal, next time check in with the virt folks on the details of the live image; we kinda needed it to be installable for virt testing | |||
|| [[#t15:36:11|15:36]] | |||
|- id="t15:36:29" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | they didn't say | |||
|| [[#t15:36:29|15:36]] | |||
|- id="t15:36:34" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | why we need anaconda? | |||
|| [[#t15:36:34|15:36]] | |||
|- id="t15:36:42" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | they weren't aware we dropped anaconda from test day lives | |||
|| [[#t15:36:42|15:36]] | |||
|- id="t15:36:48" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | well, because you can't really do virt hosting from a live session | |||
|| [[#t15:36:48|15:36]] | |||
|- id="t15:36:54" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | unless you have like 32GB of RAM | |||
|| [[#t15:36:54|15:36]] | |||
|- id="t15:37:09" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | we just told people to use the beta lives and that worked out fine, so it wasn't a big deal | |||
|| [[#t15:37:09|15:37]] | |||
|- id="t15:37:17" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | I see | |||
|| [[#t15:37:17|15:37]] | |||
|- id="t15:37:43" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | in that case maybe a tailored Live wasn't needed at all | |||
|| [[#t15:37:43|15:37]] | |||
|- id="t15:37:51" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | yeah, maybe | |||
|| [[#t15:37:51|15:37]] | |||
|- id="t15:37:59" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | like i said, it didn't turn out to be a big problem, just a note | |||
|| [[#t15:37:59|15:37]] | |||
|- id="t15:38:21" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | I'm waiting for dcbw to give me a list of packages for tomorrow's test day so that I can build a Live image for them | |||
|| [[#t15:38:21|15:38]] | |||
|- id="t15:38:34" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | FreeIPA test day should be good, they're creating the image themselves | |||
|| [[#t15:38:34|15:38]] | |||
|- id="t15:38:46" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | cool; | |||
|| [[#t15:38:46|15:38]] | |||
|- id="t15:39:13" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-06-04_Network_Manager page looks ready, kparal is working on the live image | |||
|| [[#t15:39:13|15:39]] | |||
|- id="t15:39:29" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-06-06_FreeIPA_Two_Factor_Authentication looks ready to go | |||
|| [[#t15:39:29|15:39]] | |||
|- id="t15:39:46" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | any other test day notes from anyone? | |||
|| [[#t15:39:46|15:39]] | |||
|- id="t15:42:11" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #topic Open floor | |||
|| [[#t15:42:11|15:42]] | |||
|- id="t15:42:19" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | welp, here we are folks, any other business/ | |||
|| [[#t15:42:19|15:42]] | |||
|- id="t15:42:52" | |||
! style="background-color: #818144" | tflink | |||
| style="color: #818144" | nothing I can think of, no | |||
|| [[#t15:42:52|15:42]] | |||
|- id="t15:43:27" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | tflink: we have rather a lot of proposed blockers; should we do blocker review next? | |||
|| [[#t15:43:27|15:43]] | |||
|- id="t15:44:02" | |||
! style="background-color: #818144" | tflink | |||
| style="color: #818144" | probably, yes | |||
|| [[#t15:44:02|15:44]] | |||
|- id="t15:44:11" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | oh, I hoped you wouldn't ask :) | |||
|| [[#t15:44:11|15:44]] | |||
|- id="t15:44:11" | |||
! style="background-color: #818144" | tflink | |||
| style="color: #818144" | that looks like at least 3 hours of fun | |||
|| [[#t15:44:11|15:44]] | |||
|- id="t15:44:49" | |||
| colspan="2" | * tflink gets started on prep | |||
|| [[#t15:44:49|15:44]] | |||
|- id="t15:45:14" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | kparal: c'mon, you know I never miss blocker review fun | |||
|| [[#t15:45:14|15:45]] | |||
|- id="t15:46:42" | |||
! style="background-color: #8c4a4a" | kparal | |||
| style="color: #8c4a4a" | well, I don't miss it either | |||
|| [[#t15:46:42|15:46]] | |||
|- id="t15:46:43" | |||
| colspan="2" | * j_dulaney is off | |||
|| [[#t15:46:43|15:46]] | |||
|- id="t15:46:51" | |||
! style="background-color: #97974f" | j_dulaney | |||
| style="color: #97974f" | Apologies for not participating | |||
|| [[#t15:46:51|15:46]] | |||
|- id="t15:47:25" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | so that's blocker review fun in bat-channel #fedora-blocker-review at the top of the clock, folks | |||
|| [[#t15:47:25|15:47]] | |||
|- id="t15:47:28" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | strap yourselves in | |||
|| [[#t15:47:28|15:47]] | |||
|- id="t15:48:09" | |||
! style="background-color: #488888" | brunowolff | |||
| style="color: #488888" | Note that if you are using rawhide kernels on f19, the grub(2) conf files don't (and won't) get updated. | |||
|| [[#t15:48:09|15:48]] | |||
|- id="t15:48:42" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | oh, yeah, that bug's worth a call-out | |||
|| [[#t15:48:42|15:48]] | |||
|- id="t15:48:47" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | do you have the number handy? | |||
|| [[#t15:48:47|15:48]] | |||
|- id="t15:49:29" | |||
! style="background-color: #488888" | brunowolff | |||
| style="color: #488888" | I can find it. I think it is closed though. | |||
|| [[#t15:49:29|15:49]] | |||
|- id="t15:54:15" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | welp, sounds like that's everything | |||
|| [[#t15:54:15|15:54]] | |||
|- id="t15:54:24" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | blocker review in 5 minutes folks, thanks for coming! | |||
|| [[#t15:54:24|15:54]] | |||
|- id="t15:54:24" | |||
! style="background-color: #488888" | brunowolff | |||
| style="color: #488888" | While looking, it looks like they might have pushed the fixed systemd to f19 today. Yeah! | |||
|| [[#t15:54:24|15:54]] | |||
|- id="t15:54:28" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | yay! | |||
|| [[#t15:54:28|15:54]] | |||
|- id="t15:54:31" | |||
! style="background-color: #407a40" | adamw | |||
| style="color: #407a40" | #endmeeting | |||
|| [[#t15:54:31|15:54]] | |||
|} | |||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.11.0 by [mailto:marius@pov.lt Marius Gedminas] - find it at [http://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html mg.pov.lt]! |
Latest revision as of 01:28, 4 June 2013
Attendees
- adamw (65)
- kparal (19)
- mjg59 (12)
- jreznik (11)
- tflink (9)
- brunowolff (5)
- zodbot (5)
- j_dulaney (3)
- satellit (3)
- jskladan (1)
- nirik (1)
Agenda
- Previous meeting follow-up
- Fedora 19 Final planning
- Test Days
- Open floor
Previous meeting follow-up
- adamw and anyone else to work on updating Common_F19_bugs - this was done, page is up to date for Beta
- adamw to talk to rbergeron and make sure packagekit/policykit issue makes it into the beta release notes - this was done, issue was called out in the release announcement, slashdot has not crucified us
- adamw to complete 'new model' criteria revision by converting the final criteria - this is currently in progress, aimed to be complete by Wednesday's blocker review meeting
- tflink to update the iscsi test case for newUI - not done yet, but planned soon
- tflink to schedule first blocker review meeting for this week - this was done, the meeting went ahead
- adamw to look at extracting some test cases from Test_Day:2013-05-21_AnacondaNewUI_Followup for use as optional test cases (or even enforceable partitioning test cases) for the validation matrices - not done yet, but more of a long-term goal for F20
- martix to ensure spice test day is ready on time - it was ready and went ahead fine
- satellit_e to work on some test cases for SoaS - an initial plan is available
Fedora 19 Final planning
- TC1 was due 2013-06-04, adamw would ensure it got composed
- mjg59 informed us a kernel patch is coming which ought to resolve most of the UEFI variable space issues; it should be included in TC1
Test Days
- Test_Day:2013-05-28_Virtualization and Test_Day:2013-05-30_Spice both went off quite successfully, we saw testing and developer feedback in both
- Test_Day:2013-06-04_Network_Manager and Test_Day:2013-06-06_FreeIPA_Two_Factor_Authentication both looked ready to go, kparal was working on a live image for NM test day
Open floor
Action items
- adamw to mark LLVMpipe-without-SSE2 bug as needing a release note and explain why to docs team
IRC Log
adamw | #startmeeting Fedora QA meeting | 15:00 |
---|---|---|
zodbot | Meeting started Mon Jun 3 15:00:50 2013 UTC. The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
zodbot | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. | 15:00 |
adamw | #meetingname fedora-qa | 15:00 |
zodbot | The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' | 15:00 |
adamw | #topic Roll call | 15:00 |
adamw | morning folks, who's ready for fun? | 15:01 |
* jreznik is ready for another meeting in a row | 15:01 | |
* jskladan tips his hat | 15:01 | |
* j_dulaney lurks | 15:01 | |
* satellit listening in Bellingham motel | 15:01 | |
tflink | jreznik: /me is here | 15:01 |
tflink | huh, that didn't work | 15:02 |
* kparal here | 15:02 | |
* brunowolff is here | 15:04 | |
* nirik is lurking as well | 15:04 | |
* adamw really needs to get that anti-lurking kit installed | 15:05 | |
* jreznik is working on an announcement for the devel-announce list, needs anti-lurking kit as he's more lurking now :) | 15:05 | |
adamw | #topic previous meeting follow-up | 15:06 |
adamw | #info "adamw and anyone else to work on updating Common_F19_bugs" - I got that one done, it's pretty much up to date | 15:07 |
adamw | #info "adamw to talk to rbergeron and make sure packagekit/policykit issue makes it into the beta release notes" - yup, got a mention of it into the release announcement, and no crazy slashdot conspiracy theories yet | 15:07 |
adamw | #info "adamw to complete 'new model' criteria revision by converting the final criteria" - I started working on that Friday, I'll aim to complete it today or tomorrow | 15:07 |
adamw | "tflink to update the iscsi test case for newUI" - tflink? | 15:08 |
tflink | not done yet, on my todo list for today | 15:08 |
adamw | .fire tflink first of the week | 15:09 |
zodbot | adamw fires tflink first of the week | 15:09 |
adamw | aw, no bot in here? boo. | 15:09 |
adamw | yay! | 15:09 |
adamw | #info "tflink to update the iscsi test case for newUI" - not done yet but should be soon | 15:09 |
adamw | #info "tflink to schedule first blocker review meeting for this week" - that was done, we had two review meetings last week | 15:10 |
adamw | #info "adamw to look at extracting some test cases from Test_Day:2013-05-21_AnacondaNewUI_Followup for use as optional test cases (or even enforceable partitioning test cases) for the validation matrices" - not done yet but it's kind of a long-term plan, it's on my todo list | 15:10 |
adamw | #info "martix to ensure spice test day is ready on time" - that seemed to be sorted out fine | 15:10 |
adamw | #info "satellit_e to work on some test cases for SoaS" - satellit drafted up some ideas at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_19-sugar_test_cases | 15:11 |
satellit | SoaS test cases? list of ideas http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_19-sugar_test_cases | 15:12 |
satellit | : ) | 15:12 |
adamw | :) | 15:12 |
adamw | sorry i didn't get a sec to review them yet, i'll do it today | 15:12 |
adamw | any other follow-up items I missed? | 15:12 |
brunowolff | I retested llvmpipe on a particular non-SSE2 CPU and it's still broken. | 15:13 |
adamw | ah yeah I saw your comment | 15:16 |
adamw | that's a bit of a pain. and you might be right about advising people with old machines to grab something other than GNOME | 15:16 |
adamw | we could probably mark the bug as requiring a release note for that | 15:16 |
adamw | #action adamw to mark LLVMpipe-without-SSE2 bug as needing a release note and explain why to docs team | 15:17 |
adamw | #topic Fedora 19 Final planning | 15:19 |
adamw | #info TC1 is due tomorrow, 2013-06-04, I will request the compose then | 15:20 |
adamw | do we have any major worries at this point, or things we need to get in place soon? | 15:20 |
* adamw can't think of anything urgent beyond the revised criteria | 15:20 | |
kparal | the sooner we have TC1 the better. let's request today :) | 15:21 |
tflink | have we done much upgrade testing? I've seen several comments and bugs, but wasn't sure how much poking has been done so far | 15:21 |
* jreznik would not be against requesting it sooner, if there's nothing we really want in tc1 | 15:21 | |
kparal | I did some upgrade testing on UEFI | 15:21 |
jreznik | poor kparal touching UEFI | 15:22 |
* kparal now has a master's degree in bios re-flashing | 15:23 | |
adamw | tflink: quite a few people have run fedup I think, and we did fill the matrix for beta | 15:24 |
adamw | kparal: :) | 15:24 |
tflink | adamw: yeah, I was just thinking about the less-straightforward configs that ended up causing trouble after F18 release | 15:24 |
mjg59 | adamw: We should finally have a patch that resolves most of the UEFI variable issues | 15:25 |
adamw | right, that's another area we could do with more test cases | 15:26 |
adamw | mjg59: yay! so there _were_ still issues on the kenrel side? | 15:26 |
adamw | what's the timeframe on landing that? | 15:26 |
mjg59 | adamw: Well, no. Issues on the firmware side. | 15:26 |
kparal | mjg59: what are the changes? | 15:26 |
mjg59 | But I have finally come up with an elegant mechanism for making the damn things do what we want | 15:26 |
jreznik | mjg59: and how much you can do with fw side? | 15:26 |
jreznik | mjg59: nice to hear! | 15:27 |
mjg59 | kparal: Change the threshold from 50% to 5KB, do something magic which will (in theory) force the firmware to trigger garbage collection | 15:27 |
kparal | mjg59: sounds good. can we expect a blogpost about the details? | 15:27 |
mjg59 | kparal: http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/25091.html | 15:27 |
jreznik | mjg59: what do you achieve by changing 50% to 5 KB? | 15:27 |
kparal | mjg59: thanks! | 15:28 |
mjg59 | jreznik: It's less than the maximum variable size, so we can create a new variable that's larger than the remaining space | 15:29 |
mjg59 | Or, rather, attempt to | 15:29 |
kparal | mjg59: does it mean that kernel panics will never again be stored in uefi nvram, too risky? | 15:29 |
* jreznik is reading the blog post | 15:29 | |
mjg59 | kparal: No, we should be safe in doing that | 15:29 |
adamw | mjg59: any news on the timeframe? | 15:29 |
mjg59 | adamw: It's on LKML, jwb has a scratch build | 15:30 |
mjg59 | kparal: That's currently disabled because it turns out the code is shit (which may be, uh, my fault) | 15:30 |
adamw | mjg59: well, I mean, getting it in an official f19 kernel build | 15:31 |
mjg59 | adamw: Once we've got confirmation from some testing of the scratch build | 15:31 |
adamw | kparal: hint hint :) | 15:32 |
jreznik | kparal: hint, hint ^^^ | 15:32 |
kparal | thanks guys | 15:32 |
jreznik | adamw: hey, you were faster! | 15:32 |
adamw | .fire jreznik there can be only one | 15:32 |
zodbot | adamw fires jreznik there can be only one | 15:32 |
kparal | mjg59: can you give us a link to that scratch build? | 15:32 |
mjg59 | Linked from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964335 | 15:33 |
adamw | #info mjg59 informs us a kernel patch is coming which ought to resolve most of the UEFI variable space issues. scratch build for testing linked from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964335 | 15:33 |
adamw | thanks matt! | 15:33 |
kparal | I'll try to understand the blogpost and then test the build | 15:33 |
* jreznik thinks he understands what mjg59 wants to achieve, hopes firmwares will be cooperative :) | 15:34 | |
adamw | #topic Test Days | 15:34 |
adamw | #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-05-28_Virtualization and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-05-30_Spice both went off pretty successfully last week, i saw lots of active testing on both | 15:35 |
adamw | although - kparal, next time check in with the virt folks on the details of the live image; we kinda needed it to be installable for virt testing | 15:36 |
kparal | they didn't say | 15:36 |
kparal | why we need anaconda? | 15:36 |
adamw | they weren't aware we dropped anaconda from test day lives | 15:36 |
adamw | well, because you can't really do virt hosting from a live session | 15:36 |
adamw | unless you have like 32GB of RAM | 15:36 |
adamw | we just told people to use the beta lives and that worked out fine, so it wasn't a big deal | 15:37 |
kparal | I see | 15:37 |
kparal | in that case maybe a tailored Live wasn't needed at all | 15:37 |
adamw | yeah, maybe | 15:37 |
adamw | like i said, it didn't turn out to be a big problem, just a note | 15:37 |
kparal | I'm waiting for dcbw to give me a list of packages for tomorrow's test day so that I can build a Live image for them | 15:38 |
kparal | FreeIPA test day should be good, they're creating the image themselves | 15:38 |
adamw | cool; | 15:38 |
adamw | #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-06-04_Network_Manager page looks ready, kparal is working on the live image | 15:39 |
adamw | #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-06-06_FreeIPA_Two_Factor_Authentication looks ready to go | 15:39 |
adamw | any other test day notes from anyone? | 15:39 |
adamw | #topic Open floor | 15:42 |
adamw | welp, here we are folks, any other business/ | 15:42 |
tflink | nothing I can think of, no | 15:42 |
adamw | tflink: we have rather a lot of proposed blockers; should we do blocker review next? | 15:43 |
tflink | probably, yes | 15:44 |
kparal | oh, I hoped you wouldn't ask :) | 15:44 |
tflink | that looks like at least 3 hours of fun | 15:44 |
* tflink gets started on prep | 15:44 | |
adamw | kparal: c'mon, you know I never miss blocker review fun | 15:45 |
kparal | well, I don't miss it either | 15:46 |
* j_dulaney is off | 15:46 | |
j_dulaney | Apologies for not participating | 15:46 |
adamw | so that's blocker review fun in bat-channel #fedora-blocker-review at the top of the clock, folks | 15:47 |
adamw | strap yourselves in | 15:47 |
brunowolff | Note that if you are using rawhide kernels on f19, the grub(2) conf files don't (and won't) get updated. | 15:48 |
adamw | oh, yeah, that bug's worth a call-out | 15:48 |
adamw | do you have the number handy? | 15:48 |
brunowolff | I can find it. I think it is closed though. | 15:49 |
adamw | welp, sounds like that's everything | 15:54 |
adamw | blocker review in 5 minutes folks, thanks for coming! | 15:54 |
brunowolff | While looking, it looks like they might have pushed the fixed systemd to f19 today. Yeah! | 15:54 |
adamw | yay! | 15:54 |
adamw | #endmeeting | 15:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.11.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!