Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==== Release tags ==== | ==== Release tags ==== | ||
Packages '''MUST''' follow the standard Fedora [[Packaging/NamingGuidelines# | Packages '''MUST''' follow the standard Fedora [[Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Versioning | Package versioning guidelines]]. | ||
=== JAR file installation === | === JAR file installation === |
Revision as of 08:52, 31 October 2013
These guidelines are laid out in order of relevance to packaging.
Introduction
This page represents Fedora guidelines for packaging libraries and applications written in Java and related languages using Java Virtual Machine as bytecode interpreter. It DOES NOT aim to extensively describe packaging techniques and tips. RPM macros and commands used here are documented in man pages. Furthermore a separate Java Packaging HOWTO describes Java packaging techniques in detail and includes examples, templates and documentation aimed at packagers and Java developers who are taking their first steps in Java RPM packaging.
Java Packaging
Fedora Java packaging is originally based on JPackage Project standards. Over time we have diverged in packaging tools in most areas but we mostly keep backward compatibility with older packages that make use of JPackage standards.
Package naming
Packages MUST follow the standard Fedora Packaging/NamingGuidelines.
Java API documentation MUST be placed into a sub-package called %{name}-javadoc
.
Release tags
Packages MUST follow the standard Fedora Package versioning guidelines.
JAR file installation
The following applies to all JAR files except JNI-using JAR files and application-specific JAR files (ie. JAR files that can only reasonably be used as part of an application and therefore constitute application-private data).
Split JAR files
If a project offers the choice of packaging it as a single monolithic JAR or several ones, the split packaging SHOULD be preferred.
Filenames
- If the package provides a single JAR file installed filename SHOULD be
%{name}.jar
. - If the package provides multiple JAR file, files SHOULD be installed in a
%{name}
subdirectory - Versioned JAR files (
*-%{version}.jar
) MUST NOT be installed unless the package is a compatibility package - Packages CAN provide alternative filenames as long as they do not conflict with other packages
Installation directory
- All architecture-independent JAR files MUST go into
%{_javadir}
or a Java-version specific directory%{_javadir}-*
as appropriate[1]. Packages CAN place JAR files into subdirectories.
- For installation of architecture dependent JAR files, see Packaging JAR files that use JNI
BuildRequires and Requires
Java packages MUST BuildRequire their respective build system:
BuildRequires: maven-local
for packages built with MavenBuildRequires: ant
for packages built with antBuildRequires: java-devel
for packages built with javacBuildRequires: gradle
for packages built with gradle
Java binary packages MUST have transitive Requires (generated by RPM or manual) on:
java-headless
orjava-headless >= 1:minimal_required_version
jpackage-utils
If Java package needs sound or graphical server connection it MUST have non-transitive Requires:
java
orjava >= 1:minimal_required_version
Javadoc installation
- Java API documentation uses a system known as Javadoc. All javadocs MUST be created and installed into a directory of
%{_javadocdir}/%{name}
. - Directory or symlink
%{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
SHOULD NOT exist. - The javadoc subpackage MUST be declared
noarch
even if main package is architecture specific.
CLASSPATH modification
When package needs to have additional dependencies in CLASSPATH packager SHOULD use build-classpath or build-jar-repository commands to modify CLASSPATH instead of manually specifying path to JAR files of dependencies.
Maven pom.xml files
If upstream project is shipping Maven pom.xml
files, these MUST be installed. Additionally package MUST install mapping between upstream artifact and filesystem in one of following ways:
- By using %mvn_build and %mvn_install macros when building with Maven
- By using %add_maven_depmap macros when building with Ant or other buildsystems
Wrapper Scripts
Applications wishing to provide a convenient method of execution SHOULD provide a wrapper script in %{_bindir}
.
The jpackage-utils package contains a convenience %jpackage_script
macro that can be used to create scripts that work for the majority of packages. See its definition and documentation in /etc/rpm/macros.jpackage
. One thing to pay attention to is the 6th argument to it - whether to prefer a JRE over a full SDK when looking up a JVM to invoke - most packages that don't require the full Java SDK will want to set that to true
to avoid unexpected results when looking up a JVM when some of the installed JRE's don't have the corresponding SDK (*-devel package) installed.
%install ... %jpackage_script com.sun.msv.driver.textui.Driver "" "" msv-msv:msv-xsdlib:relaxngDatatype:isorelax msv true ...
The previous example installs the "msv" script (5th argument) with main class being com.sun.msv.driver.textui.Driver (1st argument). No optional flags (2nd argument) or options (3rd argument) are used. This script will add several libraries to classpath before executing main class (4th argument, jars separated with ":"). build-classpath
is run on every part of 4th argument to create full classpaths.
Compatibility packages
In certain cases it might be necessary to create compatibility packages that provide older API/ABI level of the same library. However creating these compatibility packages is strongly discouraged. To standardize and simplify packaging of such compatibility packages following rules apply:
- Compatibility packages are named in the same way as original except addition of version to package name,
- Any JAR or POM files MUST be versioned.
-devel packages
-devel
packages don't really make sense for Java packages. Header files do not exist for Java packages.
Packaging and using EE APIs
There are a number of various project providing implementations for Java EE APIs. To simplify packaging and use of these APIs certain standardization is necessary.
EE API List
Following is a list of EE APIs as of Java EE 6[2] with chosen packages that provide implementations:
- javax.activation - JDK
- javax.annotation - JDK
- javax.el - tomcat-el-2.2-api
- javax.enterprise.inject - cdi-api
- javax.inject - atinject
- javax.jws - JDK
- javax.mail - javamail
- javax.management - JDK
- javax.management.remote - JDK
- javax.persistence - geronimo-jpa
- javax.security.auth.message - geronimo-jaspic-spec
- javax.servlet - tomcat-servlet-3.0-api
- javax.servlet.jsp - glassfish-jsp/glassfish-jsp-api
- javax.servlet.jsp.jstl - jakarta-taglibs-standard
- javax.transaction - JDK
- javax.ws.rs - jsr-311
- javax.wsdl - wsdl4j
- javax.xml - JDK
- javax.xml.bind - JDK
- javax.xml.rpc - axis
- javax.xml.soap - JDK
- javax.xml.stream - JDK
- javax.xml.ws - JDK
Packages providing APIs
In addition to following generic guidelines they MUST:
- Add Provides: javax.XXX from the EE API list
- Add directory %{_javadir}/javax.XXX that will contain symlinks to all implementation jar files and their dependencies
At one time there CAN BE multiple API implementations but there MUST be at most one package having specific javax.XXX virtual provide.
Packages using APIs
Packages that need to use EE API SHOULD use:
- Requires: javax.XXX from the EE API list
- build-classpath javax.XXX or equivalent instead of relying on package-specific jar name.
Packaging JAR files that use JNI
Applicability
Java programs that wish to make calls into native libraries do so via the Java Native Interface (JNI). A Java package uses JNI if it contains a .so file. Note that this file can be embedded within JAR files themselves.
Note that GCJ packages contain .so
s in %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
but they are not JNI .sos.
Guideline
- JNI packages MUST follow guidelines of ordinary Java packages with exceptions listed here
- JAR files using JNI or containing JNI shared objects themselves MUST be placed in
%{_jnidir}
and CAN BE symlinked to%{_libdir}/%{name}
. - JNI shared objects MUST be placed in
%{_libdir}/%{name}
Things to avoid
Pre-built JAR files / Other bundled software
Many Java projects re-ship their dependencies in their own releases. This is unacceptable in Fedora. All packages MUST be built from source and MUST enumerate their dependencies with Requires
. They MUST NOT build against or re-ship the pre-included JAR files but instead symlink out to the JAR files provided by dependencies. There may arise rare cases that an upstream project is distributing JAR files that are actually not re-distributable
by Fedora. In this situation, the JAR files themselves should not be redistributed -- even in the source zip. A modified source zip should be created with some sort of modifier in the name (ex. -CLEAN) along with instructions for reproducing. It is a good idea to have something similar to the following at the end of %prep
(courtesy David Walluck):
JAR files="" for j in $(find -name \*.jar); do if [ ! -L $j ] ; then JAR files="$JAR files $j" fi done if [ ! -z "$JAR files" ] ; then echo "These JAR files should be deleted and symlinked to system JAR files: $JAR files" exit 1 fi
Selected rpmlint issues
class-path-in-manifest
Use sed
to remove class-path
elements in MANIFEST.MF
(or whatever file is being used as the JAR manifest) prior to JAR creation. Example:
sed -i '/class-path/I d' META-INF/MANIFEST.MF