From Fedora Project Wiki
(Created page with "<!-- Self Contained or System Wide Change Proposal? Use this guide to determine to which category your proposed change belongs to. Self Contained Changes are: * changes to is...")
 
No edit summary
Line 83: Line 83:


* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
<!-- If your Change may require trademark approval (for example, if it is a new Spin), file a ticket ( https://fedorahosted.org/council/ ) requesting trademark approval from the Fedora Council. This approval will be done via the Council's consensus-based process. -->


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
<!-- What happens to systems that have had a previous versions of Fedora installed and are updated to the version containing this change? Will anything require manual configuration or data migration? Will any existing functionality be no longer supported? -->
It shouldn't have any noticable impact on upgrades, currently its possible to boot machines with both 42 and 48 bit VA changes simply by picking diffrent kernel options in grub.
 
<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
N/A (not a System Wide Change)


== How To Test ==
== How To Test ==
<!-- This does not need to be a full-fledged document. Describe the dimensions of tests that this change implementation is expected to pass when it is done.  If it needs to be tested with different hardware or software configurations, indicate them.  The more specific you can be, the better the community testing can be.
Normal system operation on aarch64 hardware.
 
This include running package unit tests/etc as normal and watching out for regressions.
Remember that you are writing this how to for interested testers to use to check out your change implementation - documenting what you do for testing is OK, but it's much better to document what *I* can do to test your change.
The change is system wide because it basically affects the entire system, but should be fairly transparent.
 
A good "how to test" should answer these four questions:
 
0. What special hardware / data / etc. is needed (if any)?
1. How do I prepare my system to test this change? What packages
need to be installed, config files edited, etc.?
2. What specific actions do I perform to check that the change is
working like it's supposed to?
3. What are the expected results of those actions?
-->


<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
Line 110: Line 96:


== User Experience ==
== User Experience ==
<!-- If this change proposal is noticeable by its target audience, how will their experiences change as a result?  Describe what they will see or notice. -->
Its unlikely a desktop user would notice the change, except possibly it may boot on additional hardware. A server user could potentially utilize more RAM for in-memory databases/etc.
<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
N/A (not a System Wide Change)


== Dependencies ==
== Dependencies ==
Line 122: Line 106:
== Contingency Plan ==
== Contingency Plan ==


<!-- If you cannot complete your feature by the final development freeze, what is the backup plan?  This might be as simple as "Revert the shipped configuration". Or it might not (e.g. rebuilding a number of dependent packages).  If you feature is not completed in time we want to assure others that other parts of Fedora will not be in jeopardy.  -->
In the worse case, the kernel can be reverted back to 42-bit VA's with a single configuration change. Otherwise, we can patch additional mozjs versions (mosjz31 if 0ad's patches arn't complete) or drop the dependent packages from the aarch64 disto until they can be fixed (really this only applies to 0ad at this point).
* Contingency mechanism: (What to do?  Who will do it?) N/A (not a System Wide Change)  <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
 
<!-- When is the last time the contingency mechanism can be put in place?  This will typically be the beta freeze. -->
<!-- When is the last time the contingency mechanism can be put in place?  This will typically be the beta freeze. -->
* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)  <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
* Contingency deadline: Beta freeze
<!-- Does finishing this feature block the release, or can we ship with the feature in incomplete state? -->
<!-- Does finishing this feature block the release, or can we ship with the feature in incomplete state? -->
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change), Yes/No <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
* Blocks release? No, the likely problem is an additional package is found to have a problem. I would expect that should this happen it won't me a major bug/package as 48-bit VA's have been in test for a while.  
* Blocks product? product <!-- Applicable for Changes that blocks specific product release/Fedora.next -->


== Documentation ==
== Documentation ==
<!-- Is there upstream documentation on this change, or notes you have written yourself?  Link to that material here so other interested developers can get involved. -->
<!-- Is there upstream documentation on this change, or notes you have written yourself?  Link to that material here so other interested developers can get involved. -->
As part of this, an attempt has been made to reduce the number of mozjs versions in use. The plan is to move dependent packages to either mozjs24 or mozjs38. There remains some work to move some of the original js 1.8.5 users, but that isn't a critical problem as simply rebuilding them solves the problems caused by the additional address bit.


<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
I can add additional information about the hardware or the dependent projects here if its appropriate.
N/A (not a System Wide Change)


== Release Notes ==
== Release Notes ==
Enable 48-bit address spaces.
<!-- The Fedora Release Notes inform end-users about what is new in the release.  Examples of past release notes are here: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ -->
<!-- The Fedora Release Notes inform end-users about what is new in the release.  Examples of past release notes are here: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ -->
<!-- The release notes also help users know how to deal with platform changes such as ABIs/APIs, configuration or data file formats, or upgrade concerns.  If there are any such changes involved in this change, indicate them here.  A link to upstream documentation will often satisfy this need.  This information forms the basis of the release notes edited by the documentation team and shipped with the release.  
<!-- The release notes also help users know how to deal with platform changes such as ABIs/APIs, configuration or data file formats, or upgrade concerns.  If there are any such changes involved in this change, indicate them here.  A link to upstream documentation will often satisfy this need.  This information forms the basis of the release notes edited by the documentation team and shipped with the release.  
Line 150: Line 134:


<!-- Select proper category, default is Self Contained Change -->
<!-- Select proper category, default is Self Contained Change -->
[[Category:SelfContainedChange]]
[[Category:SystemWideChange]]
<!-- [[Category:SystemWideChange]] -->

Revision as of 23:17, 29 September 2016


Change Proposal Name

Summary

Enable 48bit VA on AARCH64

Owner

Current status

  • Targeted release: Fedora 26
  • Last updated: 2016-09-29
  • Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>

Detailed Description

The current aarch64 kernel is using a 42-bit process virtual address (VA) space. This is fairly limiting, but aarch64 processors also have support for 48-bit VA's. This is actually 1-bit more than the "47-bit" VA's currently used on x86_64. This change is a fairly minor kernel configuration but it has caused problems with mozjs and luajit based projects because they have stored tags in their pointers in the 48th address bit. The upstream mozjs project has been fixed, and there are a set of changes outstanding for luajit. Futher there, have been patches applied to rawhide to support it (bug #1242326, bug #1375305. bug #1375547), but the packages dependent on js185 require a rebuild due to an ABI change.


Benefit to Fedora

Larger aarch64 processes won't be constrained by both the virtual as well as physical limitations of the 42-bit VA currently in use. This actually also helps with things like hugetlb's and potentially provides a performace boost. Lastly, it allows fedora to boot on a class of machines that have the majority of their RAM higher in the address space.

Scope

  • Proposal owners:
  • Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

Upgrade/compatibility impact

It shouldn't have any noticable impact on upgrades, currently its possible to boot machines with both 42 and 48 bit VA changes simply by picking diffrent kernel options in grub.

How To Test

Normal system operation on aarch64 hardware. This include running package unit tests/etc as normal and watching out for regressions. The change is system wide because it basically affects the entire system, but should be fairly transparent.

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

User Experience

Its unlikely a desktop user would notice the change, except possibly it may boot on additional hardware. A server user could potentially utilize more RAM for in-memory databases/etc.

Dependencies

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Contingency Plan

In the worse case, the kernel can be reverted back to 42-bit VA's with a single configuration change. Otherwise, we can patch additional mozjs versions (mosjz31 if 0ad's patches arn't complete) or drop the dependent packages from the aarch64 disto until they can be fixed (really this only applies to 0ad at this point).

  • Contingency deadline: Beta freeze
  • Blocks release? No, the likely problem is an additional package is found to have a problem. I would expect that should this happen it won't me a major bug/package as 48-bit VA's have been in test for a while.

Documentation

As part of this, an attempt has been made to reduce the number of mozjs versions in use. The plan is to move dependent packages to either mozjs24 or mozjs38. There remains some work to move some of the original js 1.8.5 users, but that isn't a critical problem as simply rebuilding them solves the problems caused by the additional address bit.

I can add additional information about the hardware or the dependent projects here if its appropriate.

Release Notes

Enable 48-bit address spaces.