No edit summary |
(added a query about subvolume discussion) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Comment2: Well, technically it does not change from today's configuration. Today, if you select encryption, it will create LUKS. If not, it will just use ext4-on-LVM-without-LUKS. But I see the point, will make the update. | Comment2: Well, technically it does not change from today's configuration. Today, if you select encryption, it will create LUKS. If not, it will just use ext4-on-LVM-without-LUKS. But I see the point, will make the update. | ||
==== Are subvolumes really mostly like directories? ==== | |||
In this section, there is a phrase "But subvolumes share most of the other trees". What does that mean? What are trees in this context? |
Revision as of 09:15, 30 June 2020
Q1: How would encryption of /home and / subvolumes be implemented?
A1: For the F33 timeline, we plan to stick with Btrfs-on-LUKS, so there will be one big LUKS partition, on top of which there will a Btrfs with multiple subvolumes (root and home). In future, once Btrfs implements native encryption (this is work in progress upstream), we will propose to make a switch, but this is definitely not going to happen in F33.
Comment1: Sounds great. Thanks for the information.Should this be documented in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BtrfsByDefault#Detailed_Description or is the 'on-LUKS' not default?
Comment2: Well, technically it does not change from today's configuration. Today, if you select encryption, it will create LUKS. If not, it will just use ext4-on-LVM-without-LUKS. But I see the point, will make the update.
Are subvolumes really mostly like directories?
In this section, there is a phrase "But subvolumes share most of the other trees". What does that mean? What are trees in this context?