From Fedora Project Wiki

(New page: {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}} {{admon/note | Foreword | * Frames that use this style are '''redaction tips'''. Please remove them from your page once they are no longer necessary. Do the sa...)
 
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:




''A traditional Polish typeface''
''A traditional serif Polish typeface''


{{admon/note | Packager | Correct the proposal and replace it with the final package '''summary'''.}}
{{admon/note | Packager | Correct the proposal and replace it with the final package '''summary'''.}}
Line 94: Line 94:
# The font is probably intended to be published under the usual GUST license (LPPL variant), and being a from-scratch digital revival there should not be any legal problems. This needs no be clarified upstream however (otherwise OFL or GPL + font exception would be good).
# The font is probably intended to be published under the usual GUST license (LPPL variant), and being a from-scratch digital revival there should not be any legal problems. This needs no be clarified upstream however (otherwise OFL or GPL + font exception would be good).
# This licensing would not require building from source, though it would be nice to get the sources published and use them to build the Fedora TrueTypes.
# This licensing would not require building from source, though it would be nice to get the sources published and use them to build the Fedora TrueTypes.
# Upstream unfortunately has a deplorable attitude on licensing (see page 5 of this [http://tug.org/interviews/interview-files/BJJMNiv8.pdf interview], and page 8 of this [http://www.gust.org.pl/projects/e-foundry/tex-gyre/afp05.pdf presentation]), not understanding that muddy licensing just makes everyone waste major amounts of time and energy. Upstream needs to be contacted and convinced to put a clear licensing statement in the font archives, and optionally the font metadata and the font web page.
# Upstream unfortunately has a deplorable attitude on licensing (see page 5 of this [http://tug.org/interviews/interview-files/BJJMNiv8.pdf interview], and page 8 of this [http://www.gust.org.pl/projects/e-foundry/tex-gyre/afp05.pdf presentation]), not understanding that muddy licensing just makes everyone waste major amounts of time and energy. Upstream needs to be contacted and convinced to put a clear licensing statement in the font archives as a detached file, and optionally the in font metadata and on the font web page.


{{admon/note | Packager | Take care of those items and remove them from the page once they've been dealt with.
{{admon/note | Packager | Take care of those items and remove them from the page once they've been dealt with.

Revision as of 12:28, 22 November 2008

A page of the Fonts Special Interest Group

Foreword
  • Frames that use this style are redaction tips. Please remove them from your page once they are no longer necessary. Do the same for the lorem ipsum bits.
  • Remember the more complete and accurate the information you add is, the more likely a font is to be packaged and widely used.
  • Do not forget to update the page categorization once the font status changes.


A traditional serif Polish typeface

Packager
Correct the proposal and replace it with the final package summary.


Description

This font was designed in the 'twenties and the 'thirties of the XXth century by Polish graphic artist and a typographer Adam Półtawski. It was widely used by Polish printing houses as long as metal types were in use (until the 'sixties).

The electronic replica of Antykwa Półtawskiego was prepared by Bogusław Jackowski, Janusz M. Nowacki and Piotr Strzelczyk (JNS TEAM) and first released during the meeting of the Polish TeX Users Group (GUST) (Bachotek, Poland, April-May, 2000) as a preliminary version.

The main source of Antykwa Półtawskiego were printouts of metal types.

Packager
Correct the proposal and replace it with the final package description.


Characteristics

Homepage Format & features License Review reference Koji page pkgdb page
Antykwa Półtawskiego TTF LPPL?
Packager
  • Once a package has entered the review stage, add a Review reference ④ such as 181994. You can reference this wiki page in your review request as additional information. Please do not forget to CC fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com on your bugzilla ticket.
  • Once a package has been approved, add the corresponding:


Style Faces Scripts
Sans Serif Other R B I BI Other Latin Greek Cyrillic Other
Variable Monospace Variable Monospace

Caveats

  1. The font is probably intended to be published under the usual GUST license (LPPL variant), and being a from-scratch digital revival there should not be any legal problems. This needs no be clarified upstream however (otherwise OFL or GPL + font exception would be good).
  2. This licensing would not require building from source, though it would be nice to get the sources published and use them to build the Fedora TrueTypes.
  3. Upstream unfortunately has a deplorable attitude on licensing (see page 5 of this interview, and page 8 of this presentation), not understanding that muddy licensing just makes everyone waste major amounts of time and energy. Upstream needs to be contacted and convinced to put a clear licensing statement in the font archives as a detached file, and optionally the in font metadata and on the font web page.
Packager
Take care of those items and remove them from the page once they've been dealt with.


Additional information

  1. High-quality work as usual from GUST.



Fonts in Fedora
The Fonts SIG takes loving care of Fedora fonts. Please join this special interest group if you are interested in creating, improving, packaging, or just suggesting a font. Any help will be appreciated.
Packager
You MUST replace the Category:Font wishlist tag with: Don't forget to remove the « : » before « Category » to activate a particular category tag.