Line 203: | Line 203: | ||
<!-- If you cannot complete your feature by the final development freeze, what is the backup plan? This might be as simple as "Revert the shipped configuration". Or it might not (e.g. rebuilding a number of dependent packages). If you feature is not completed in time we want to assure others that other parts of Fedora will not be in jeopardy. --> | <!-- If you cannot complete your feature by the final development freeze, what is the backup plan? This might be as simple as "Revert the shipped configuration". Or it might not (e.g. rebuilding a number of dependent packages). If you feature is not completed in time we want to assure others that other parts of Fedora will not be in jeopardy. --> | ||
* Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) | * Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) Change owner will revert the update to redhat-rpm-config. <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
<!-- When is the last time the contingency mechanism can be put in place? This will typically be the beta freeze. --> | <!-- When is the last time the contingency mechanism can be put in place? This will typically be the beta freeze. --> | ||
* Contingency deadline: | * Contingency deadline: Mass Rebuild <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
<!-- Does finishing this feature block the release, or can we ship with the feature in incomplete state? --> | <!-- Does finishing this feature block the release, or can we ship with the feature in incomplete state? --> | ||
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change), | * Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change), No <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
== Documentation == | == Documentation == |
Revision as of 02:29, 1 June 2022
RPM Macros for Build Flags
Summary
Create a corresponding macro for each compiler flag in the redhat-rpm-config macro file and create "extra flag" macros to make it easier for packages to control the set of default flags.
Owner
- Name: Tom Stellard
- Email: <tstellar@redhat.com>
Current status
- Targeted release: Fedora Linux 37
- Last updated: 2022-06-01
- FESCo issue: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
- Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
- Release notes tracker: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
Detailed Description
Detailed Description
The macros file in the redhat-rpm-config package contains a list of default compiler flags for packages to use when compiling C,C++, and Fortran packages. There is currently no standard way to remove or add to the set of default flags. Most packages use a combination of echo and sed to remove unwanted flags or add new ones. Some examples:
ghdl: OPT_FLAGS=echo %{optflags}|sed -e 's/\(-Wp,\)\?-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[12]//g'
julia: %global optflags %(echo %{optflags} | sed 's/-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS //')
compiler-rt: global optflags %(echo %{optflags} -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE)
This change will add new macros which will make it easier for packages to add and remove their own compiler flags. This strategy is already used to some extent with feature macros like %{_lto_cflags}, %{_hardening_cflags}, etc, but these new flags will give packagers more fine-grained control over the options.
The proposed new macros macros for adding new flags are:
%_pkg_extra_cflags %{nil} %_pkg_extra_cxxflags %{nil} %_pkg_extra_fflags %{nil} %_pkg_extra_ldflags %{nil}
These will be added to %{build_cflags}, %{build_cxxflags}, %{build_fflags}, and %{build_ldflags} respectively to allow packges to add their own flags to the default list: e.g.
%build_cflags %{optflags} %{_package_extra_cflags}
The proposed new macros to represent existing flags are:
%_flag_fstack_protector_strong -fstack-protector-strong %_flag_z_now -Wl,-z,now %_flag_z_defs -Wl,-z,defs %_flag_flto_auto -flto=auto %_flag_ffat_lto_objects -ffat-lto-objects %_flag_o -O2 %_flag_f_exceptions -fexceptions %_flag_g -g %_flag_grecord_gcc_switches -grecord-gcc-switches %_flag_pipe -pipe %_flag_wall -Wall %_flag_werror_format_security -Werror=format-security %_flag_fortify_source -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 %_flag_glibcxx_assertions -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS %_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables %_flag_fstack_clash_protection -fstack-clash-protection %_flag_fcf_protection -fcf-protection %_flag_mbranch_protection_standard -mbranch-protection=standard
In addition to adding these new macros, there would be a policy that requires all new flags to have their own RPM macro.
Feedback
Benefit to Fedora
- It will provide a standard way to disable existing compiler flags or enable new ones that is more simple than the existing echo + grep solution.
- It will make it easier to determine which packages disable or modify which flags by doing a simple grep of the spec files.
- It will make it easier for toolchain developers to experiment with adding new flags to the distribution as this can be done with a simple macro definition instead of patching redhat-rpm-config.
Scope
- Proposal owners:
* Proposal owners will update the redhat-rpm-config package and add the new macros. * Proposal owners will test the changes to ensure that the correct flags are still being used.
- Other developers:
* Other developers may, but are not required to, update their packages to use the new macros.
- Release engineering: #Releng issue number
- Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
The Fedora packaging policy will be updated to require that new flags added to redhat-rpm-config come with their own RPM macro.
- Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
- Alignment with Objectives:
Upgrade/compatibility impact
How To Test
User Experience
This is a change for developers and will have no impact to the user experience.
Dependencies
Contingency Plan
- Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) Change owner will revert the update to redhat-rpm-config.
- Contingency deadline: Mass Rebuild
- Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change), No
Documentation
N/A (not a System Wide Change)