m (only look for bugs in new state) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* make sure they've completed phases [[Font_package_lifecycle#2.a|2.a]] (and eventually [[Font_package_lifecycle#1|1]]) of our workflow, | * make sure they've completed phases [[Font_package_lifecycle#2.a|2.a]] (and eventually [[Font_package_lifecycle#1|1]]) of our workflow, | ||
* read attentively our [[:Category:Fonts_packaging|fonts packaging]] section, | * read attentively our [[:Category:Fonts_packaging|fonts packaging]] section, | ||
* adhere closely to our official [[ | * adhere closely to our official spec templates ([[Simple fonts spec template|1]],[[Fonts spec template for multiple_fonts|2]]). | ||
Revision as of 15:32, 20 December 2008
Fonts listed in this category are being worked on and are waiting to complete their review process.
Sometimes a packager bypasses the SIG workflow and wonders why no one is reviewing his submission. You can find and rescue those stealth review requests there. Please ask their submitters to:
- make sure they've completed phases 2.a (and eventually 1) of our workflow,
- read attentively our fonts packaging section,
- adhere closely to our official spec templates (1,2).
Reviewer duties for font packages are explained in phase 2.b and 2.d of our workflow.
If you want to help a review just follow the review link listed on the font page. Once this process is finished, make sure the font page category is changed to Category:Packaged fonts.
Pages in category "In-progress fonts"
The following 13 pages are in this category, out of 13 total.