AxelThimm/kmdls/voting

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-August/msg00061.html

Hi,

I suggest to vote through email about replacing the current kernel
scheme with the kmdl or similar scheme.

a) kernel module scheme needs uname-r-in-name

b) kernel module scheme needs one-specfile approach (for both usreland
and kernel modules)

c) kernel module scheme needs to be kernel agnostic (both version
*and* flavour)

d) support for coinstallation of kmdls should be pushed into FC6 asap
(working plugin has already been submitted here and tested be
ATrpms users). Requires a positive vote on a-c)

e) Adoption of kmdl interface scheme as used at ATrpms and outlined on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AxelThimm/kmdls. Requires a positive
vote on a-d)

f) Assignment to kmdl-task force to integrate kmdl support into the
buildsystems used by Fedora (myself volunteering). Requires a
positive vote on a-e)

g) Allow kmdl package submissions to Fedora Core/Extras. Requires a
positive vote on a-f)

Without voting, but dependent on vote results: Assist in GFS kmdl
packaging (altready done at FC4 times, needs to resurface).
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Note: voting was concluded on Wed, Aug 23rd 2006, 16:00 UTC. Any missing votes were notes as "0" - only +1 votes count for passing a proposal, and 6 out of 10 are needed. Therefore none of the proposals passed.

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g
TomCallaway	-1	-1	-1	-1	-1	-1	-1
RexDieter	+1	+1	+1	+1	+1	+1	+1
JesseKeating	-1	-1	-1	-1	-1	-1	-1
ToshioKuratomi	0	-1	-1	-1	-1	-1	-1
DavidLutterkort	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
VilleSkyttä	0	-1	-1	-1	-1	-1	-1
AxelThimm	+1	+1	+1	+1	+1	+1	+1
JasonTibbitts	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
RalfCorsepius	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
JoseOliveira	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Sum	+2 -2 6 votes missing	+2 -4 4 votes missing	+2 -4 4 votes missing	+2 -4 4 votes missing	+2 -4 4 votes missing	+2 -4 4 votes missing	+2 -4 4 votes missing
passes	no	no	no	no	no	no	no