Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00085.html | [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00085.html | ||
=== | === Fedora Security Policy === | ||
[[ | [[MikeMcGrath|Mike McGrath]] wrote[3] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list about the proposed Fedora Security Policy. Mike asked that he would like everyone in the sysadmin-* group to be compliant with this policy. | ||
[ | [3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00103.html | ||
On this thread several people commented about changes they would propose in iptables[4] & [5] | |||
[ | [4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00105.html | ||
[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00107.html |
Revision as of 06:24, 26 January 2009
Infrastructure
This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-infrastructure-list
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure
Contributing Writer: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
Why Puppet uses config instead of configs
susmit shannigrahi asked[1] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list asked why, in the fedora-infrastructure implementation of puppet when we add a new file, in the .pp file the path is written as puppet:///config where as the actual path of the file is in the configs directory. To this Jeroen van Meeuwen answered [2] by saying that the [config] fileserver mount may point to /path/to/configs which may allow this discrepancy to exist.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00084.html
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00085.html
Fedora Security Policy
Mike McGrath wrote[3] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list about the proposed Fedora Security Policy. Mike asked that he would like everyone in the sysadmin-* group to be compliant with this policy.
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00103.html
On this thread several people commented about changes they would propose in iptables[4] & [5]
[4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00105.html
[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00107.html