m (added Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts in prep to archive) |
m (PackagingDrafts/FixMailingListRefs moved to Archive:PackagingDrafts/FixMailingListRefs: (no revisions since import from MoinMoin May 2008) Changes appears to have been made (remove references to fedora-extras-list)) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 21:07, 21 February 2009
Since fedora-extras-list is going away, the guidelines need to be changed to refer to the appropriate list as necessary. I am not sure if fedora-devel or fedora-maintainers (or even fedora-packaging) is the proper list.
In Packaging/Guidelines:
Binary Firmware section
If you are unsure whether or not your files meet these requirements, ask on fedora-extras-list, and we will examine them for you.
Code vs. Content section
If you are unsure if something is considered approved content, ask on fedora-extras-list.
In Packaging/NamingGuidelines:
Normal Packages section
If in doubt, ask on fedora-extras-list.
Others
There are two other documents which contain references to extras-list which may need to be looked at by the PC: