Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

Projects published on a “forge” can be packaged using the forgemeta macro.

What is a “forge” for the forgemeta macro?
Any software publishing website, permitting the download of source code archives on normalized URLs, that can be deduced from a project root URL on the website plus version/commit/tag/scm/extension values, is a “forge”.

Links :

Usage

A. The packager declares upstream-dependent metadata :

forgeurl: the project URL on the target software hosting service
version: the project release to package, if non nil (as Version: xxx)
commit: the commit hash to package, if any
tag: the project tag to package, if any
scm: the source code management engine used by the software hosting service, if packaging a tag or a commit, and if the service allows different engines.

B. The packager calls the %forgemeta macro to compute rpm-oriented metadata:

forgesource: the corresponding source file URL, that can be used as Source:
shortcommit: a commit hash reduction
setupargs: the arguments that %setup will need
archivename: the corresponding archive name (often used by setupargs)
archiveext: the corresponding archive extension
archiveurl: the archive URL, without renaming
dist: auto-adjusted when packaging a tag or commit

C. (Optionnal) The packager calls the %forgemetacheck macro to display the values of computed variables. %forgemetacheck emits rpm warnings. It should be safe to call from any point of the spec file.

On variable resolution
forgemetacheck resolves the values of rpm variables at one point of the spec file. Since most of those variables are themselves composed of other variables, it is possible for those values to change if one of the variables used in the composition is overridden by the packager after the forgemetacheck call.

D. The packager uses the computed metadata as needed.

Packaging examples

Packaging a release (except for GitLab)

%global forgeurl    https://github.com/alecthomas/kingpin/
Version:            2.2.5

%forgemeta
%forgemetacheck (optionnal)

…
Release: 1%{?dist}
…
URL:    %{forgeurl}
Source: %{forgesource}
…
%prep
%setup  %{?setupargs}

%forgemetacheck output:

Forge-specific packaging variables
  forgeurl:        “https://github.com/alecthomas/kingpin”
  forgesource:     “https://github.com/alecthomas/kingpin/archive/v2.2.5.tar.gz#/kingpin-2.2.5.tar.gz”
  shortcommit:     “”
Generic variables
  setupargs:       “-n kingpin-2.2.5”
  archivename:     “kingpin-2.2.5”
  archiveext:      “tar.gz”
  archiveurl:      “https://github.com/alecthomas/kingpin/archive/v2.2.5.tar.gz”
  scm:             “”
  tag:             “”
  commit:          “”
  dist:            “.fc28” (snapshot date is computed once the corresponding source file is available)

Packaging a release (GitLab)

GitLab is inconvenient

Any download from GitLab requires knowledge of the corresponding commit.
Release download depends on a Git tag, which is free-form. If your release tag value does not match Version (for example, if it is v%{version}), you also need to declare tag before calling forgemeta.

%global forgeurl    https://gitlab.example.com/foo/bar
%global commit      2a810629566a2d0f0d4107df244e8828b9f7bd5c
Version:            8.18.1
 
%forgemeta

…
Release: 1%{?dist}
…
URL:    %{forgeurl}
Source: %{forgesource}
…
%prep
%setup  %{?setupargs}

Packaging a release tag

%global forgeurl    https://github.com/apache/thrift/
Version:            0.10.0
%global tag         %{version}
 
%forgemeta
%forgemetacheck (optionnal)

…
Release: 1%{?dist}
…
URL:    %{forgeurl}
Source: %{forgesource}
…
%prep
%setup  %{?setupargs}

%forgemetacheck output:

Forge-specific packaging variables
  forgeurl:        “https://github.com/apache/thrift”
  forgesource:     “https://github.com/apache/thrift/archive/0.10.0.tar.gz#/thrift-0.10.0.tar.gz”
  shortcommit:     “”
Generic variables
  setupargs:       “-n thrift-0.10.0”
  archivename:     “thrift-0.10.0”
  archiveext:      “tar.gz”
  archiveurl:      “https://github.com/apache/thrift/archive/0.10.0.tar.gz”
  scm:             “git”
  tag:             “0.10.0”
  commit:          “”
  dist:            “.fc28” (snapshot date is computed once the corresponding source file is available)

Packaging a commit

%global forgeurl    https://code.googlesource.com/google-api-go-client/
%global commit      3a1d936b7575b82197a1fea0632218dd07b1e65c

%forgemeta
%forgemetacheck (optionnal)

…
Version: 0
Release: 0.1%{?dist}
…
URL:    %{forgeurl}
Source: %{forgesource}
…
%prep
%setup  %{?setupargs}

%forgemetacheck output:

Forge-specific packaging variables
  forgeurl:        “https://code.googlesource.com/google-api-go-client”
  forgesource:     “https://code.googlesource.com/google-api-go-client/+archive/3a1d936b7575b82197a1fea0632218dd07b1e65c.tar.gz#/google-api-go-client-3a1d936b7575b82197a1fea0632218dd07b1e65c.tar.gz”
  shortcommit:     “”
Generic variables
  setupargs:       “-c”
  archivename:     “google-api-go-client-3a1d936b7575b82197a1fea0632218dd07b1e65c”
  archiveext:      “tar.gz”
  archiveurl:      “https://code.googlesource.com/google-api-go-client/+archive/3a1d936b7575b82197a1fea0632218dd07b1e65c.tar.gz”
  scm:             “git”
  tag:             “”
  commit:          “3a1d936b7575b82197a1fea0632218dd07b1e65c”
  dist:            “.git3a1d936.fc28” (snapshot date is computed once the corresponding source file is available)

Packaging a pre-release commit

On Version declaration order
It is generally safe to declare Version before calling %forgemeta even for pre or post-releases. Except for GitLab. Due to GitLab's use of commit for release downloads, you MUST declare Version after calling %forgemeta when the packaged commit does not match the release commit.

%global forgeurl     https://gitlab.example.com/foo/bar/
%global commit       51637bc0960002b811e1c0c7be8671cf9a1cc5be
 
%forgemeta

Name:    foobar
Version: 3.2.6
Release: 0.1%{?dist}
…
URL:    %{forgeurl}
Source: %{forgesource}
…
%prep
%setup %{?setupargs}

Post-release packaging is similar. See also Packaging:Versioning#Release_and_post-release_versions.

Extending the macro

If the project you're packaging is published on a software publishing service forgemeta has no knowledge of, don't be sad, that's pretty easy to fix.

note down the archive URLs you want to generate for versions, tags and commits
locate the latest version of the forgemeta macro (it should be installed in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.forge-srpm by fedora-rpm-macros)
copy the definition block closest to your needs after the other definition blocks. It should look like :

 if (forge == "vvv") then
 …
 end

or

 if (string.match(forge, "vvv")) then
 …
 end

change the "vvv" value

Don't be afraid of Lua patterns!
While the Lua pattern syntax is a bit unusual, it is quite simple. You can launch an interactive interpreter to experiment in with the lua command. Most of the times the existing forgemeta macro will already contain something similar to what you need to accomplish.

adapt the initial normalization rule

    forgeurl = string.match(forgeurl, "www")

adapt the initial error message

      error("xxx URLs must match “yyy”!")

set the hosting service defaults

   if (archiveext == "") then
     rpm.define("archiveext tar.xz")
   end
   if (setupargs == "") then
     rpm.define("setupargs -n %{archivename}")
   end
   if (commit ~= "") or (tag ~= "") then
     rpm.define("scm git")
   end

scrap the variables you need from forgeurl using:

      local myvariable = string.match(forgeurl, "zzz")

use your variables to define archivename and archiveurl in the following if tag/commit/version block
install the result in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.forge-srpm
test with forgemetacheck and rpmbuild -bs myspecfile.spec
submit the enhancement for inclusion in fedora-rpm-macros once it works satisfactorily.

Benefits and limitations

Benefits:

Fedora packagers no longer need to know about the URL structure of well-known forges.
Spec files are simpler, less error-prone, easier to maintain and audit.
Forge URLs can be defined and fixed in a single place, without waiting for guidelines to percolate.
The macros are mostly written in Lua, making them more verbose but easier to adjust and extend.
The macros are written in Lua and can perform error handling.
It is very easy to switch from commit to tag to version (or any combination of those).
scm snapshot date is exact and does not rely on a variable which may or may not have been updated.
Almost all the computations are done in optional rpm variables that can be ignored by the packager if he does not need or does not like the result.
Fedora forge know-how can be capitalized over time.
The macro normalizes common spec constructs such as archivename.

Limitations:

The macro is not intended to be used in spec files that package multiple forge archives (it could probably be extended, is the added flexibility worth the complexity?).
The macro needs to be updated when a forge changes its structure (but better changing one place than lots of spec files).
New forges need to be added to the macro before it can be used with them.
dist munging can not be easily reverted once forgemeta has been called. The alternative would be to 1. change fedora-release to define dist as %{?snapid}%{?distroid} and set distroid to the value dist is set today, and 2. let other macros such as forgemeta define snapid later. Cleaner but a lot more invasive and more difficult to propagate downstream.
dist commit date computation relies on source files with the correct modification time (incorrect source file modification time → incorrect dist date).
spectool may not work in older Fedora derivatives (but just use forgemetacheck and copy the source URL form its output).
The macro highlights some historical rpm design mistakes: bad separation of upstream and package metadata, special magic variables. This is why version declaration occurs in an unusual (for rpm) order and requires a specific syntax.

Testing

Just drop in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/ the file proposed here for inclusion in fedora-rpm-macros, and play with the result. The file name must be prefixed with “macros.”.

Search

Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

Contents

Links :

Usage

Packaging examples

Packaging a release (except for GitLab)

Packaging a release (GitLab)

Packaging a release tag

Packaging a commit

Packaging a pre-release commit

Extending the macro

Benefits and limitations

Testing