Relocate RPM database to /usr
Summary
Currently, the RPM databases is located in /var
. Let's move it to /usr
. The move is already under way in rpm-ostree-based installations, and in (open)SUSE.
Owner
- Name: Chris Murphy, Michel Alexandre Salim, Neal Gompa
- Email: bugzilla@colorremedies.com, michel@michel-slm.name, ngompa13@gmail.com
Current status
- Targeted release: Fedora Linux 36
- Last updated: 2021-12-30
- devel thread
- FESCo issue: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
- Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
- Release notes tracker: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
Detailed Description
Current location
/var/lib/rpm
New location
/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
/var/lib/rpm
will be a symlink pointing to /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
- The RPM database primarily describes the state of
/usr
. Storing the databases in/usr
will more easily facilitate OS snapshots and rollback, without affecting/var
. - The need for moving rpmdb to /usr was brought up in a 2017 thread on the upstream rpm-maint@ list. Various locations for rpmdb (and similar databases) is discussed in the thread, with the end result being
/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
. - There's upstream RPM, rpm-ostree, and (open)SUSE agreement for this location.
Note: Changing the file system layout to accommodate a snapshot+rollback regime is implied, but not required by this proposal. For example, Fedora has long placed /home
on a separate subvolume (or file system) so it can be isolated from system root. Likewise, it makes sense to isolate /var/log
and possibly /var/lib/libvirt/images
so these locations continue to carry forward in time, even if the system root does a rollback.
Feedback
There will be no change to DNF as part of this change proposal. DNF's history will remain in /var
until DNF 5. Discussion continues about the effect of a snapshot+rollback regime on DNF history. Relocate DNF history to /usr.
Upstream RPM accepts the change, but institutionally don't like the loss or weakening of a very well known location for the database, and anticipate complaints.
Benefit to Fedora
- Helps align Fedora variants with each other
- rpm-ostree based systems (including CoreOS, IoT, Silverblue, Kinoite) already use
/usr/lib/sysimage
for rpmdb.
- rpm-ostree based systems (including CoreOS, IoT, Silverblue, Kinoite) already use
- Consistency with another RPM-based distro, (open)SUSE has made this change
- Accounts for various snapshot+rollback regimes, i.e. it's a beneficial change whether Btrfs or device-mapper based.
Scope
- Proposal owners:
- changes in rpm package
- create the new path
- create a symlink for the old path pointing to new path
- changes in rpm package
- Other developers:
- changes in SElinux policy
- Release engineering: #Releng issue 10441
- Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
- Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
- Alignment with Objectives:
Upgrade/compatibility impact
Change will be applied to offline upgrades, similar to the RPM sqlite database change. A systemd service will move the rpmdb from /var to /usr, then create a symlink pointing to /usr from /var.
- Create
/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
(rpm package will do this at preinst) - Create symlinks in
/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm/
pointing to files in/var/lib/rpm/
(rpm package will do this at preinst) - Change the dbpath in
/usr/lib/rpm/macros
to/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
(rpm package will be patched to do this on F36+) - Request rpm rebuild the database (done via systemd service)
- Remove
/var/lib/rpm
and create a symlink/var/lib/rpm
->/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
(done via systemd service)
How To Test
- Perform a new clean install, or upgrade a system
- Check that
/var/lib/rpm
is a symlink to/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
- Check that
/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
is populated with at leastrpmdb.sqlite
, possibly alsorpmdb.sqlite-shm
andrpmdb.sqlite-wal
- Confirm
rpm -q <package>
and/orrpm -qa
still work
User Experience
- symlink
/var/lib/rpm
->/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
Otherwise, the change should be invisible to users.
Dependencies
rpm-ostree
probably should make/usr/share/rpm
a symlink to/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
, rather than the reverse as it is currently.PackageKit
might use inotify on/var/lib/rpm
need to check if it does and whether it should be changed or add the additional path
Contingency Plan
- Contingency mechanism: Revert the change, try again the next Fedora release.
- Contingency deadline: Beta freeze
- Blocks release? Yes