From Fedora Project Wiki
| #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: | 00:01 | |
| http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings | ||
| Meeting started Thu Sep 24 00:01:38 2009 UTC. The chair is | 00:01 | |
| Sparks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | ||
| Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. | 00:01 | |
| #topic Roll Call | 00:01 | |
| * Sparks | 00:01 | |
| * jjmcd . | 00:02 | |
| * danielsmw | 00:02 | |
| * ianweller kinda sorta not really | 00:03 | |
| * Sparks gives everyone just a few more minutes | 00:05 | |
| Okay, let's get started. | 00:08 | |
| #topic Last week's action items | 00:08 | |
| quaid to follow up with Richard about the use of the CC logo | 00:09 | |
| on the wiki. | ||
| none of the action item guys are here | 00:09 | |
| Yeah, I just realized that. | 00:09 | |
| We'll just pass these by... | 00:09 | |
| #topic Release notes format changes | 00:09 | |
| jjmcd: Is there any further discussion on this? | 00:09 | |
| what were we changing? | 00:09 | |
| A little late, they are being built each night | 00:10 | |
| I don't know. | 00:10 | |
| We'll just call this topic done. | 00:10 | |
| #topic Status on CMS (Zikula) | 00:10 | |
| http://fedora.is-sixsigma.com/F12beta | 00:10 | |
| Is there any update on Zikula? | 00:11 | |
| Um, I guess I have a small one | 00:11 | |
| danielsmw: go ahead | 00:11 | |
| I hope I'm not being a blocker, but I'm not done with my package yet. | 00:11 | |
| I am very close though | 00:11 | |
| and most of the work is done | 00:11 | |
| danielsmw: Which package? | 00:11 | |
| what I need is a legit packager to help me out with my | 00:12 | |
| packaging mistakes | ||
| Xinha, for Scribite! | 00:12 | |
| #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zikula#Module_status | 00:12 | |
| ^^^ I don't see it on the list. Could you add it, please? | 00:12 | |
| danielsmw: I'm a packager but certainly not legit. | 00:12 | |
| ianweller is one, though. | ||
| Sparks: alright | 00:13 | |
| If he can't help you then maybe he can point you to someone who can | 00:13 | |
| wait, should this be on this list? | 00:13 | |
| Yes. | 00:13 | |
| okay | 00:13 | |
| even though it's a general package | 00:13 | |
| and not a zikula module? | 00:13 | |
| Well... it's needed for Zikula, right? | 00:13 | |
| It's just that it's _for_ zikula, which is why I brought it up now. | 00:13 | |
| Yeah, it is | 00:13 | |
| So I guess it goes there then. | 00:14 | |
| I'll update the list. :) | 00:14 | |
| TU | 00:14 | |
| danielsmw: Do you know how much more time it will take to | 00:14 | |
| get it straight? | ||
| if I may... I had started to package Xinha for a project of | 00:14 | |
| mine (but they I abandoned as I didn't use it in the end) | ||
| Sparks: i really do have most of it done now, I believe. | 00:15 | |
| It's just silly rpmbuild errors | ||
| all I remember is that it wasn't a hard package, I had it built | 00:15 | |
| bochecha: it doesn't look that hard, I'm just no good at packaging. :) | 00:15 | |
| danielsmw: What are the errors? | 00:15 | |
| danielsmw, if I can help, drop me an email, I had already done it :P | 00:15 | |
| Sparks: things like... using sources that aren't archives, and such. | 00:16 | |
| bochecha: will do, thanks! | 00:16 | |
| Sparks: but the main outline of what I"m doing is there. | 00:16 | |
| danielsmw.fedorapeople.org/xinha.spec | 00:16 | |
| danielsmw: Okay. If I can get my head above water (maybe | 00:17 | |
| this weekend) I'll be happy to look at it. ianweller fixed so many | ||
| errors for me that I might know how to fix yours | ||
| might | 00:17 | |
| Sparks: might. thanks, it looks like I'll be getting plenty of help. | 00:17 | |
| danielsmw, if you have time tomorrow I might help, too tired tonite | 00:17 | |
| cool | 00:18 | |
| great | 00:18 | |
| thanks everyone. | 00:18 | |
| i appreciate it. | 00:18 | |
| Anything else for zikula? | 00:18 | |
| uh | 00:19 | |
| I have a question | 00:19 | |
| danielsmw: Go ahead | 00:19 | |
| * quaid arrives back | 00:19 | |
| On that page you told me to edit, FCKeditor is listed as | 00:19 | |
| something that needs to be packaged | ||
| * quaid can address his item when it comes back around | 00:19 | |
| which is basically the same thing as Xinha. | 00:19 | |
| is there a reason they should both be done? | 00:19 | |
| No | 00:20 | |
| or is that just left over? | 00:20 | |
| Not really | 00:20 | |
| okay, i'll remove it then. | 00:20 | |
| Okay, anything else for Zikula? | 00:21 | |
| #topic Status on CC license rollout. | 00:22 | |
| quaid: Were you able to follow up with Legal? | 00:22 | |
| danielsmw: did you get hooked up with the Beacon maintainer? | 00:22 | |
| Sparks: yes! | 00:22 | |
| quaid: no, I forgot! | 00:22 | |
| ironically, Richard just pointed back to spot | 00:22 | |
| and spot knows of the problem; and there doesn't seem to be a solution | 00:22 | |
| i.e., the CC logo(s) are not coverable by the CC-BY-SA | 00:22 | |
| but maybe spot can explain better ... | 00:23 | |
| * quaid forgot to ask if he'd be around | 00:23 | |
| neither is our logo... | 00:23 | |
| BUT, I'm good either way | 00:23 | |
| heh, nor are other logos we might carry | 00:23 | |
| yeah | 00:23 | |
| spot: You around? | 00:24 | |
| I guess not. | 00:25 | |
| So I don't see the problem with using it. | 00:25 | |
| And I do see a problem with using it. | 00:25 | |
| So are we going to go with "don't use it"? | 00:26 | |
| well, we have a clear legal guidance for don't use | 00:26 | |
| so, for now, we don't use it. | 00:26 | |
| I'll ask spot to explain on list, k? | 00:26 | |
| k | 00:26 | |
| #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/License_changeover_schedule | 00:27 | |
| So I guess we need to make internal notifications and then | 00:27 | |
| get ianweller on changing the wiki over | ||
| rudi's not here tonight but he was still trying to get | 00:28 | |
| access to those packages so he could change the Publican brand files | ||
| over | ||
| * danielsmw is sneaking out early. peace. | 00:28 | |
| danielsmw: Have a good one | 00:28 | |
| Anything else on the license changeover? | 00:28 | |
| * quaid is happy :) | 00:29 | |
| #topic # | 00:29 | |
| * | 00:29 | |
| #topic Shared open-source style guide | 00:29 | |
| I think this is a rudi thing, too. Anyone have anything to | 00:29 | |
| report on this? | ||
| well, yes | 00:30 | |
| this was just part of something, righ? | 00:30 | |
| quaid: Go ahead | 00:30 | |
| do we have someone who is focusing on what is going on | 00:30 | |
| with the upstream initiative? | 00:30 | |
| Well.... | 00:30 | |
| writingopensource.org, right? | 00:30 | |
| maybe | 00:30 | |
| I don't remember now | 00:30 | |
| I think rudi was working on getting RH to release their docs | 00:30 | |
| right | 00:31 | |
| I think ke4qqq was going to work on it as well | 00:31 | |
| that is something we can contribute to the upstream effort, | 00:31 | |
| or so I thought we discussed :) | ||
| I forget who was on-list with this item ... | 00:31 | |
| he's a gnome.org person, iirc. | 00:31 | |
| yeah, I think someone else had point but I don't remember who | 00:31 | |
| * quaid looks | 00:31 | |
| It's been so long ago I don't even remember | 00:34 | |
| shaun mcchance? | 00:34 | |
| * quaid having slow browser ... | 00:34 | |
| * quaid joins http://identi.ca/group/wosdocs | 00:35 | |
| So we need to figure out who from FP is going to work on this. | 00:36 | |
| I think ke4qqq was interested but I don't know how much time | 00:36 | |
| he has now | ||
| Let's take this to the list and see if we can stir up any interest | 00:38 | |
| anything else on this? | 00:38 | |
| #topic Guide needs? | 00:39 | |
| Are their any guides (or RN) that need help? | 00:39 | |
| I see some weird stuff | 00:40 | |
| need to get w/rudi | 00:40 | |
| okay... anything else? | 00:40 | |
| #topic New Guides | 00:41 | |
| Any new guides? | 00:41 | |
| #topic All other business | 00:42 | |
| Anyone have anything else? | 00:42 | |
| * Sparks thinks we're going to get done early | 00:44 | |
| 5 | 00:44 | |
| 4 | 00:44 | |
| 3 | 00:44 | |
| 2 | 00:44 | |
| 1 | 00:44 | |
| #endmeeting | 00:44 | |