From Fedora Project Wiki
AutoQA - add support for detecting false positives
| Status | Contact | Mentor | Skills |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDEA | nobody | nobody | python, searching best solutions, working with big data-sets |
| Description | |||
| Generally this task would be about going through all the false positives AutoQA reported and figuring a method how not to run into the issue again and how to detect, if something changes. AutoQA needs to filter out this issues and not report them. | |||
Take a look at these issues (for example):
- https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-April/013933.html
- add some black/white-list
- https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-April/013903.html
- see the "libgnome" issue - somebody could add names of all packages and their's files into the dictionary
- problem "doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gnome-python2-gnomevfs-2.28.1/async-xfer.py /usr/bin/env" could be reported directly as a bug. Could some Python-guy confirm that "/usr/bin/env python" was obsoleted by "/usr/bin/python"?
- https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-April/013908.html
- migth ignore conflicts like this - like if I have conflicting basepackage-subpackage1-ver1 and basepackage-subpackage2-ver2 - I can determine, that the conflict is only theoretical, because if I have updated system, there will be only one of the packages.
- ...and more.