Infrastructure
This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-infrastructure-list
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure
Contributing Writer: HuzaifaSidhpurwala
Planning a future L10N infrastructure (including Fedora)
Asgeir Frimannsson wrote on the @fedora-infrastructure-list [1] about his views on the current localisation infrastructure. He summarises the current infrastructure which is used by the localisation team, which includes the version control system and other online tools. He also discusses transifex. He also discusses the requirements for a system where the translation lifecycle would be managed within 'Translation Repositories'
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00108.html
Puppet training
Mike McGrath wrote on the @fedora-infrastructure-list [2] that he is going to hold a puppet training next wednesday. He also posted an ogg and the slide deck [3] to which his live training will be identical.
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00124.html
[3] http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/puppet/
Fedora 10 Beta Release Planning Meeting
John Poelstra wrote on the @fedora-infrastructure-list [4] about the Fedora 10 Beta Release Planning Meeting. He has also posted the list of participants and the meeting logs.
[4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00135.html
Infrastructure update notice
Paul W. Frields wrote on the @fedora-infrastructure-list [5] about the announcement which went out on the fedora-announce-list [6]. Paul confirmed that all of our services were back online now.
[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00140.html
[6] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-September/msg00009.html
app2 disk space
Mike McGrath wrote on the @fedora-infrastructure-list[7] about the recent disk alerts on app2. It seems that the host was not built with enough disk space similar to app1. It does raise a point about storage for transifex though. Basically each host running transifex or damned lies, keeps a local copy of every scm as part of its usage. For performance reasons that should not change but its something we'll want to figure out long term. So after the freeze the host is going to be rebuilt.
[7] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00155.html