Fedora Project Board Meeting :: Tuesday 2008-03-25
Roll Call
Attendees: Paul Frields, Jef Spaleta, Steve Dickson, Seth Vidal, Karsten Wade, Bill Nottingham, Matt Domsch, Dennis Gilmore, John Poelstra, Chris Aillon
Regrets: Bob McWirther
Followup to Previous Business
fedoraproject.org mail (2008-01-29)
- Take steps to approach changes that were requested in the past
- Could we create a better start and search page for Fedora mailing list?
- ACTION: check back on status in one month
- OWNER: Dennis Gilmore
- FOLLOWUP 2008-02-26
- Dennis has spoken with some people inside RHT IS
- should have no issues making a fedora branded interface to Red Hats mailman instance and having a @fedoraproject.org alias for fedora lists
- existing lists will stay where they are
- could migrate all mailing lists to fedoraproject.org in time time if so desired
- driving forces here is:
1. making everything run Fedora 1. break ties to RHT IS which does not make Fedora a priority
- fedoraproject.org email addresses lost four days of email a week ago and RHT did nothing to try and remedy the problem
- FOLLOWUP on 2008-03-25
- No update at this time
- OWNER: Dennis needs to sit down and work things out with Red Hat IS
- Next followup on 2008-04-29
Post-release updates of custom spins (2008-01-29)
- Should the board have to approve them?
- We will hosts as many spins as we have space for
- Need to determine the hosting requirements and limits
- How long will spins stay around?
- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/SpinsProcess
- ACTION: Jef to review Rahul's proposal and report back to board
- OWNER: Jef Spaleta
- FOLLOWUP on 2008-02-12
- Jef is waiting for feedback from Jeremy Katz on release engineering's perspective
- Reference: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/Meetings/2008-feb-11
- People are still not clear on exactly what is required to create an official "Fedora Spin"
- Need a clear list of guidelines of what a spin owner is responsible for and what they are required to test
- Hoping a test will come from Jeremy Katz as part of feedback from release engineering
- We are only talking about spins that use GA packages, thus testing for GA should have given us enough comfort that risk is minimized
- We only need to be concerned with new combination of packages that a spin would present
- ACTIONS & OWNERS:
- Paul Frields--followup with Fedora Release Engineering and QA contingent to discuss testing requirements
- Jef Spaleta to formulate specific guidelines for review prior to or at next board meeting (dependent on feedback from release engineering)
- FOLLOWUP on 2008-02-19
- Crux of issue right now is figuring out exactly what input release engineering is supposed to be giving
- Jef will have a writeup to the board by next meeting
- Paul will be at the Red Hat office in Westford, MA next week and can sit down and work out any of the remaining details with Jeremy, Jesse, Will, etc.
- FOLLOWUP on 2008-02-26
- releng has created http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JeremyKatz/SpinChecklist
- Jef has input from Rahul and plans to start writing a draft
- FOLLOWUP on 2008-03-04
- Jef posting proposal to fedora-advisory-board-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-March/msg00004.html
- FOLLOWUP on 2008-03-11
- Jef posting updated proposal to fedora-advisory-board-list today and ongoing discussion will continue on fedora-advisory-board-list:
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-March/msg00074.html
- GOALS:
1. Solidify rest of the policy this week 1. Board to vote on proposal at next meeting
- FOLLOWUP on 2008-03-18
- Jef was unable to attend today--deferred to next meeting.
- FOLLOWUP on 2008-03-25
- Remaining issues to resolve before final written proposal:
1. Specifying what space (infrastructure storage) limits are 1. Need a policy decision around locally built spins from official kickstart files from Fedora CVS (which have trademark approval) 1. Need to resolve issue with how/where source RPMS will be provided
New Business
Trademark Licensing
- Legal preparing an agreement for schwag producers
- People that want to produce schwag can sign trademark licensing agreement
- Control remains with Red Hat to review and enforce usage
- OWNER: Paul Frields
- ACTIONS:
1. Continuing to meet with Legal to review final draft 1. Work to smooth out issue of licensing trademark with custom spins
Fedora Accounts
- What are the procedures for disabling questionable Fedora accounts?
- Continue discussion at next meeting
IRC Meeting Next Time
- Channels are already setup and ready go
- Need moderator
- Administrative process outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/IRC
- OWNER: Paul Frields
- ACTIONS: Check with Max Spevack to see if he will be the moderator again
Future Business
Next Meeting
- Date: 2008-04-01
- Time: 14:00 EDT
- Location: IRC
- Public channel to ask questions: #fedora-board-public
- Moderated channel for board answers: #fedora-board-meetings
- Board to only join moderated channel so as to focus discussion there