From Fedora Project Wiki
mNo edit summary |
m (internal link cleaning) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Participants == | == Participants == | ||
* [[KevinKofler]] | |||
* [[LukasTinkl]] | |||
* [[JaroslavReznik]] | |||
* [[ThanNgo]] | |||
* [[RexDieter]] | |||
* [[User:Thomasj|ThomasJanssen]] | |||
* [[RadekNovacek]] | |||
* nucleo | |||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
Line 12: | Line 19: | ||
** kde-4.5.4 status | ** kde-4.5.4 status | ||
** qt-4.7.x for f13 : where are we? push forward? drop it? | ** qt-4.7.x for f13 : where are we? push forward? drop it? | ||
** [[Meeting:Board_meeting_2010-12-06|spin position]] | |||
** [http://dot.kde.org/2010/12/06/kde-announces-calligra-suite Calligra] | |||
** [[Features/KDE46]] | ** [[Features/KDE46]] | ||
*** kde-4.5.85 status | *** kde-4.5.85 status | ||
Line 19: | Line 28: | ||
== Transcript == | == Transcript == | ||
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-12-07/kde-sig.2010-12-07-14.03.html Meeting minutes] | |||
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-12-07/kde-sig.2010-12-07-14.03.log.html Full log] | |||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
'''kde-4.5.4 status''' | |||
* AGREED: to push 4.5.4 to updates-testing | |||
* than to prepare update | |||
* kde-4.5.4 and kdepim-4.4.8 to be grouped in one update | |||
* rdieter_work joined as later - in-transit | |||
'''qt-4.7.x for f13 : where are we? push forward? drop it?''' | |||
* we are still not sure we really want to update 4.7 in f13 | |||
** +1 by Kevin_Kofler, other folks tend to not update or don't know yet, don't care | |||
** we need list of arguments for FESCo (disagreement - before or after update?) | |||
*** QtWebKit security, bugfixes but regressions (any?), backward compatible, new neat features | |||
* no conclussion -> move discussion onlist | |||
'''Calligra''' | |||
* http://dot.kde.org/2010/12/06/kde-announces-calligra-suite | |||
* KOffice fork, in short term it looks like winner (more projects joining Calligra over original KOffice) | |||
* Naming? Especially Words (MS concerns) | |||
* Could we ship both? Potential conflicts... | |||
* Ready by KO/Calligra 2.4 | |||
'''qt-x11 (assistant) depends on qt-webkit''' | |||
* qt-assistant uses qtwebkit to render documentation => new dependency for qt-x11 | |||
* than prepared patch to use qtextbrowser | |||
** but it's not as powerfull as qtwebkit (HTML/CSS subset implemented) - should be ok for docs? | |||
* AGREED: on testing patch in rawhide for feedback by our devs/users | |||
* alternative: split qt-assistant and use Provides: qt4-assistant | |||
== Comments == | == Comments == |
Latest revision as of 22:13, 17 September 2016
Meeting Time
- 2010-12-07 14:00 UTC
- #fedora-meeting on freenode
Participants
Agenda
- topics to discuss:
- kde-4.5.4 status
- qt-4.7.x for f13 : where are we? push forward? drop it?
- spin position
- Calligra
- Features/KDE46
- kde-4.5.85 status
- recent bugs:
- qt-x11 (assistant) depends on qt-webkit
- kdevelop broken with kde-4.6beta click here for the bug report, need 4.2 snapshot?
Transcript
Summary
kde-4.5.4 status
- AGREED: to push 4.5.4 to updates-testing
- than to prepare update
- kde-4.5.4 and kdepim-4.4.8 to be grouped in one update
- rdieter_work joined as later - in-transit
qt-4.7.x for f13 : where are we? push forward? drop it?
- we are still not sure we really want to update 4.7 in f13
- +1 by Kevin_Kofler, other folks tend to not update or don't know yet, don't care
- we need list of arguments for FESCo (disagreement - before or after update?)
- QtWebKit security, bugfixes but regressions (any?), backward compatible, new neat features
- no conclussion -> move discussion onlist
Calligra
- http://dot.kde.org/2010/12/06/kde-announces-calligra-suite
- KOffice fork, in short term it looks like winner (more projects joining Calligra over original KOffice)
- Naming? Especially Words (MS concerns)
- Could we ship both? Potential conflicts...
- Ready by KO/Calligra 2.4
qt-x11 (assistant) depends on qt-webkit
- qt-assistant uses qtwebkit to render documentation => new dependency for qt-x11
- than prepared patch to use qtextbrowser
- but it's not as powerfull as qtwebkit (HTML/CSS subset implemented) - should be ok for docs?
- AGREED: on testing patch in rawhide for feedback by our devs/users
- alternative: split qt-assistant and use Provides: qt4-assistant