From Fedora Project Wiki
(Created page with " == Firewall Config == Generally ambiguous, not helpful, requires more firewalld") |
m (Vater moved page Talk:Openvpn to Talk:OpenVPN: capitalization done right like on wikipedia and the project) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Firewall Config == | == Firewall Config == | ||
Not very complete, firewalld commands untested | |||
== Server configuration == | |||
I used the server setup on CentOS 7 and want to give some feedback. | |||
Overall the setup has been good, but the second firewall-cmd didn't work on my system. Instead I used the following command for enabling the masquerade. | |||
<code> | |||
firewall-cmd --add-masquerade | |||
</code> | |||
Further I am curios about two things regarding the setup. First of all, why the <code>ln -s ...</code> command? A <code>systemctl enable …</code> looks to me sufficient. The other thing I am curious are the sample server setups. Why is the '''roadwarrior-server.conf''' used or why is it preverable over the '''server.conf'''? | |||
--[[User:Tvannahl|Tvannahl]] ([[User talk:Tvannahl|talk]]) 19:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:24, 26 April 2020
Firewall Config
Not very complete, firewalld commands untested
Server configuration
I used the server setup on CentOS 7 and want to give some feedback.
Overall the setup has been good, but the second firewall-cmd didn't work on my system. Instead I used the following command for enabling the masquerade.
firewall-cmd --add-masquerade
Further I am curios about two things regarding the setup. First of all, why the ln -s ... command? A systemctl enable … looks to me sufficient. The other thing I am curious are the sample server setups. Why is the roadwarrior-server.conf used or why is it preverable over the server.conf?