(New page: = DBus Policy = == Summary == Due to a https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18229 security issue, the DBus system bus policy has changed, and many applications were incorrect...) |
(add PK, as that broke last time) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
== Test Plan == | == Test Plan == | ||
* Desktop: Test NetworkManager and HAL+device mounting. | * Desktop: Test NetworkManager and HAL+device mounting. | ||
* Desktop: Test PackageKit and installing updates using a GUI tool | |||
Shouldn't be any denials in <tt>/var/log/messages</tt> | Shouldn't be any denials in <tt>/var/log/messages</tt> | ||
Revision as of 15:49, 26 February 2009
DBus Policy
Summary
Due to a [security issue], the DBus system bus policy has changed, and many applications were incorrect.
Owner
- Name: Colin Walters <walters@redhat.com>
Current status
- Targeted release: Fedora 11
- Last updated: 2009-02-26
- Percentage of completion: 90%
Detailed Description
Essentially the system bus policy was unintentionally wide open, and a number of applications relied on this and shipped incorrect or incomplete policy files in /etc/dbus-1/system.d.
There's more information in [this mail], as well as [this mail].
Known issues have been added to [this upstream tracker bug].
There is logging of denials to /var/log/messages.
Benefit to Fedora
Fixes an important line of defense in the core OS security.
Scope
Any package which ships a file in /etc/dbus-1/system.d may be affected.
Test Plan
- Desktop: Test NetworkManager and HAL+device mounting.
- Desktop: Test PackageKit and installing updates using a GUI tool
Shouldn't be any denials in /var/log/messages
User Experience
No user visible experience.
Dependencies
None.
Contingency Plan
We could continue to be in "permissive" mode for another release, but I'd really like not to do that.
Documentation
See the detailed description for information.
Release Notes
Comments and Discussion
Can be discussed on the fedora-devel list or the [upstream list].