From Fedora Project Wiki
Attendees
People present (lines said):
- jlaska (125)
- wwoods (19)
- kparal (12)
- Oxf13 (12)
- jforbes (9)
- dgilmore (8)
- saccia (7)
- hircus (6)
- bcl (5)
- lmacken (3)
- robatino (2)
- nirik (1)
- Viking-Ice (1)
Unable to attend:
Agenda
Previous meeting follow-up
- No previous items
F14 Beta RC Testing
- Owner - hurry
- Summary
- RC2 available for test
- Several open F14Beta blocker bugs remain ...
- RHBZ #627789 - Error setting up repository - 16, Device busy
- RHBZ #635330 - Boot menu is missing in F14 Beta RC2 install discs
- RHBZ #635332 - On system with multiple disks, anaconda does not offer target device selection screen
- RHBZ #635395 - ConsoleKit session not properly opened (xfce)
- RHBZ #635396 - ConsoleKit session not properly opened (lxde)
- Next steps...
- Announce to applicable community lists
- Continue testing (installer and desktop)
- QA presents status on release criteria at 2010-09-22 - Fedora 14 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting
F14 Test Days
Sep 16 - trans/keymap installer
- Owner - hurry
- Summary
- Sep 16 - Translation/keyboard in anaconda
- According to
fedora-qa ticket#112
, rhe and igor have prepared the event - Next steps...
- Announce to applicable community lists
- Announce to fedora planet
Sep 23 - Virtualization
- Owner - jforbes
- Summary
- On schedule, but no wiki instructions created yet
- Next steps...
- Reach out to jforbes to offer guidance
Sep 28-30 - Graphics test week
- Owner - adamwill
- Summary
- Tuesday, Sep 28 - Nouveau
- Wednesday, Sep 29 - Radeon
- Thursday, Sep 30 - Intel
- Next steps...
AutoQA update
- Owner - User:wwoods
- Summary
- jskladan updated Writing_AutoQA_Tests with new more updated content
- kparal + wwoods reviewed and merged multihook and upgradepath patches
- lmacken noted that updated bodhi with 'pending' tag support should be available later today
- kparal presented AutoQA at FUDCon (see QA:Presentations)
- autoqa-0.4.2-1 released
- wwoods reviewed and updated Updates_Lessons#2010-05-27_-_nss-softokn_update_problems based on findings of how the nss-softokn issue was missed
- Next steps...
- wwoods will also add an rpm test transaction to depcheck to catch file conflicts
- jskladan and wwoods investigating mash integration
Open discussion - <Your topic here>
- Brian Lane raised RHBZ #627789 - Error setting up repository - 16, Device bus for consideration as a blocker bug. Jlaska and Bcl agreed to discuss further after the meeting.
Upcoming QA events
- 2010-07-29 - Test Alpha 'Test Compose'
- 2010-07-30 - Alpha Blocker Meeting (f14alpha) #3
- 2010-08-05 - Test Alpha Candidate
- 2010-08-06 - Alpha Blocker Meeting (f14alpha) #4
- 2010-08-11 - Fedora 14 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting (17:00 EST) -- introduced 1 week schedule slip
- 2010-08-18 - Fedora 14 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting (17:00 EST)
- 2010-08-24 - Alpha Public Availability
- 2010-08-27 - Beta Blocker Meeting (f14beta) #1
- WE ARE HERE
- 2010-09-02 - Pre-Beta Acceptance Test Plan
- 2010-09-03 - Beta Blocker Meeting (f14beta) #2
Action items
- All - please help test the beta (see Category:Fedora_14_Beta_RC_Test_Results)
IRC Transcript
jlaska | #startmeeting Fedora QA Meeting | 15:00 |
---|---|---|
zodbot | Meeting started Mon Sep 20 15:00:04 2010 UTC. The chair is jlaska. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
zodbot | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. | 15:00 |
jlaska | #meetingname fedora-qa | 15:00 |
zodbot | The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' | 15:00 |
jlaska | #topic Gathering carbon units | 15:00 |
jlaska | alright ... show of limbs, who do we have lurking? | 15:00 |
* Viking-Ice ... | 15:01 | |
jlaska | Hi Viking-Ice | 15:01 |
* hircus ! | 15:01 | |
* kparal here | 15:02 | |
jlaska | welcome hircus + kparal | 15:02 |
* Oxf13 | 15:02 | |
* wwoods | 15:02 | |
jlaska | Oxf13: welcome from CEST | 15:03 |
jlaska | wwoods arrived in a shoe? | 15:04 |
jlaska | do we have adamw lurking in the shadows? | 15:04 |
jlaska | if not, we'll save the F-14-Beta update until the end | 15:04 |
* dgilmore is around | 15:05 | |
jlaska | dgilmore: hi | 15:05 |
jlaska | okay, let's get started ... | 15:05 |
saccia | morning people :-) | 15:05 |
jlaska | saccia: howdy | 15:05 |
jlaska | #topic Previous Meeting follow-up | 15:05 |
jlaska | This will be quick ... since I see no action items from last weeks meetbot minutes | 15:06 |
jlaska | shout if I missed something, otherwise I'll move on | 15:06 |
jlaska | alright ... skipping F-14-Beta status for now ... we'll come back to that when adamw has arrived | 15:07 |
jlaska | #topic Fedora 14 Test Days | 15:07 |
jlaska | The installer keymap/lang event last week seems to have been quite successful in terms of bugs | 15:07 |
jlaska | looks like good participation on the wiki, that's always positive | 15:08 |
jlaska | #info installer keymap/lang test day recap - http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2010-September/000133.html | 15:08 |
jlaska | in case you aren't subscribed to test@ or test-announce@ see the link above for the recap from Igor | 15:08 |
jlaska | next up ... Virtualization this Thursday | 15:09 |
jlaska | #info Sep 23 - Virtualization Test Day - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-09-23_Virtualization | 15:09 |
jlaska | jforbes: nice, the wiki is coming along | 15:09 |
jlaska | jforbes: anything we can do to help keep this event focused? | 15:10 |
jforbes | jlaska: nope, getting the last of it up today, and going to send out an email to fedora-vert | 15:10 |
jforbes | err virt even :) | 15:10 |
jlaska | heh ... okay, adamw or I (anyone else encouraged) can hit up Fedora planet with a post about the event as well | 15:11 |
jforbes | Yeah, I will do that too | 15:11 |
jlaska | jforbes: were there specific features you wanted covered for this event, or is this more of a general virt testing theme? | 15:11 |
jforbes | more general, but spice will be covered | 15:12 |
* jlaska always worried that we try to fit too much into a single virt test day | 15:12 | |
jlaska | hmm, wonder if it would make sense to theme it around spice? | 15:12 |
hircus | some of the packages listed in "Update your machine" are not the latest as of today. Perhaps the page can be updated? esp. for the kernel version | 15:12 |
jforbes | Not sure how much of an audience spice will have | 15:12 |
jforbes | hircus: The page will be updated on wednesday, as there will be updates between now and then | 15:13 |
jlaska | jforbes: is that hardware specific, or just new enough that we wouldn't have a lot of participation | 15:13 |
jforbes | jlaska: both limited audience due to desktop nature, and lack of libvirt/virt-manager integration will make it less user/tester friendly | 15:14 |
jlaska | jforbes: aah, I see (re: the integration portion) | 15:14 |
jforbes | But we also have people who will come to test that who would not otherwise participate, it does have a lot of interest | 15:14 |
jlaska | nice! | 15:15 |
jlaska | jforbes: well, shout if you need help/guidance on the wiki setup (shouting in #fedora-qa helps) | 15:16 |
jforbes | jlaska: will do, thanks | 15:16 |
jlaska | following virtualization, we have the always well attended ... <drumroll> | 15:16 |
jlaska | #info Sept 28-30 - Graphics test week | 15:16 |
jlaska | Adam has wiki pages in place already, so it looks like things are in good shape | 15:16 |
jlaska | I'm sure we'll know more later in the week | 15:17 |
jlaska | that's all I had on test days | 15:17 |
jlaska | next up ... autoqa | 15:17 |
jlaska | #topic AutoQA Package Update Acceptance | 15:17 |
jlaska | wwoods: do you want to kick things off? | 15:18 |
* kparal noticed a flood of new patches lately | 15:18 | |
jlaska | kparal: you can blame me for some of those | 15:19 |
kparal | how much can happen in just a few days | 15:19 |
kparal | until wwoods wake up, I'll just note that I presented AutoQA in FUDCon this weekend | 15:20 |
kparal | you can see the slides here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Presentations | 15:20 |
kparal | unfortunately there are no recordings of the talk | 15:20 |
jlaska | well, I pushed out autoqa-0.4.1-1, and then tried to fix several quick bugs I found so you had a mostly functional autoqa for your talk (autoqa-0.4.2-1) | 15:20 |
* wwoods appears | 15:20 | |
jlaska | kparal: nice blog posts on the subject as well | 15:20 |
Oxf13 | it was a nice talk | 15:21 |
Oxf13 | there was some genuine interest in the audience, and I apologize for hijacking the talk by answering some of the questions :) | 15:21 |
kparal | Oxf13: thank you for that | 15:21 |
* kparal leaves mic to wwoods | 15:22 | |
wwoods | so, work on depcheck continues, albeit slowly | 15:22 |
jlaska | #info kparal gave AutoQA presentation at FUDCon Zurich - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Presentations | 15:22 |
wwoods | more interesting, we merged the 'multitests' branch into master, so now we should have proper support for multihook tests and things | 15:23 |
wwoods | but that's all kparal and jskladan's work, so hooray for them | 15:23 |
jlaska | which makes me wonder whether the test result mails should prefix the subject with the hookname? But that's a detail for autoqa-devel@ | 15:23 |
wwoods | jlaska: is that stuff in 0.4.2 or are we still shooting for an 0.4.5 (or similar) release for that? | 15:24 |
wwoods | jlaska: good point - and yes, let's discuss that on the list | 15:24 |
lmacken | wwoods: bodhi should start utilizing the new pending tags today... rolling the code out as we speak. | 15:24 |
jlaska | wwoods: 0.4.2 is the current release ... mainly due to my failure to read the list before tagging 0.4.1 | 15:24 |
wwoods | lmacken: excellent! jskladan gave me some code demonstrating how we can use mash with or without a tag | 15:25 |
wwoods | so I'll be writing some unittests to prove the mashing / multilib stuff works as expected in depcheck | 15:25 |
lmacken | wwoods: oh, interesting. | 15:25 |
wwoods | and then soon we'll actually wire it up | 15:25 |
lmacken | sounds good | 15:25 |
jlaska | #info lmacken noted that bodhi should start utilizing new 'pending' tags today | 15:26 |
jlaska | wwoods: anything other updates? | 15:28 |
wwoods | oh - I updated the Updates Lessons page | 15:28 |
wwoods | with information about the nss-softokn problem | 15:28 |
wwoods | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Lessons | 15:28 |
jlaska | wwoods: oh right, thank you ... that one was a bit complex | 15:28 |
jlaska | wwoods: what's the next milestone for the depcheck test? | 15:29 |
jlaska | I saw a ticket update from jskladan last week that he got something working with mash | 15:29 |
jlaska | kparal: anything we need to get on the radar based on the feedback from your talk? | 15:30 |
wwoods | jlaska: right - next milestones are getting depcheck using mash - to make sure its input matches what bodhi would push | 15:31 |
wwoods | and making depcheck do an RPM test transaction - like yum does - to make sure its test matches what yum would do on people's systems | 15:31 |
jlaska | this is for capturing file conflicts? | 15:31 |
kparal | jlaska: I received comments mainly on whitelisting rpmlint output and using beaker. the first thing is being solved on our ML, but I had still no time to read through it. the second thing can be discussed later, I think it's still not fully opensource yet | 15:32 |
hircus | jlaska: one suggestion I recall from the talk is having Koji integration for AutoQA | 15:32 |
jlaska | hircus: "integration"? | 15:32 |
wwoods | jlaska: yes | 15:33 |
kparal | I think hircus means what I had in my slides. showing autoqa results right next to the newly built packages in Koji page | 15:33 |
wwoods | ah, integration in the web frontend. yes, that would be cool | 15:33 |
kparal | hircus: yes, we have it in our plans :) | 15:33 |
jlaska | which we are hand-waving and referring to as "resultsdb" for now | 15:33 |
hircus | another aspect that some people were asking is to do the local builds inside mock / koji | 15:34 |
jlaska | resultsdb - the magic test results web service | 15:34 |
kparal | ah, yes. I wasn't able to answer those mock questions | 15:34 |
wwoods | that's... not really a QA problem | 15:34 |
jlaska | #info wwoods and jskladan continue to work on depcheck and integration with mash | 15:34 |
jlaska | hircus: yeah, what wwoods said. Was this specific to something about QA, or just general mock/koji? | 15:35 |
jlaska | alright ... anything else on the autoqa front? | 15:36 |
jlaska | if not ... we'll dive into F-14-Beta | 15:36 |
jlaska | (head first) | 15:36 |
hircus | it's QA related, in a way -- I could imagine autoqa tests would be more reproducible if you can control the local environment | 15:36 |
jlaska | hircus: autoqa tests are designed to be easy to run and not require a lot of setup/prep | 15:37 |
hircus | fair enough | 15:37 |
jlaska | if there are some specifics that are painful to work with ... do speak up though | 15:38 |
jlaska | but for now, let's take that to autoqa-devel@ for further discussion | 15:38 |
jlaska | #topic F-14 Beta Testing | 15:38 |
jlaska | adamw isn't around, so I'll go off of current status based on F14Beta and several email threads | 15:38 |
jlaska | RC#2 contains the following open F14Beta blocker bugs .. | 15:39 |
jlaska | 635396 - ConsoleKit session not properly opened (xfce) | 15:39 |
jlaska | 635395 - ConsoleKit session not properly opened (lxde) | 15:39 |
jlaska | 635332 - FC14 Beta RC2 i386 netinstall fails to boot | 15:39 |
jlaska | 635330 - Boot menu is missing in F14 Beta RC2 install discs | 15:39 |
jlaska | the last is clearly a blocker, given the recently added criteria around artwork | 15:39 |
jlaska | I'm still trying to gather more information around the RC2 netinstall failure, I've not had any problems with netinstalls so far | 15:40 |
Oxf13 | I'm really interested in a retrospective as to why 396 and 395 were found so late | 15:40 |
jlaska | And the first 2 issues (ConsoleKit) are fairly major for both spins | 15:40 |
saccia | jlaska: I experience this with more than netinstall.... I've updated the bug with what happened | 15:40 |
jlaska | Oxf13: likewise, /me adds | 15:40 |
saccia | the "Where to install bootloader" screen doesn't appear even though I have two drives | 15:41 |
* nirik is having trouble duplicating 635396 | 15:41 | |
saccia | I also might consider adding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622694 as a beta blocker too if it seems fair | 15:41 |
jlaska | saccia: do you get the screen where you get to pick the 2 drives | 15:42 |
jlaska | for install/boot devices? | 15:42 |
jlaska | and it has the radio button to choose which drive to install the bootloader | 15:42 |
saccia | jlaska: no... I took "screen shots" that show it appears in alpha but not in RC1/RC2 | 15:42 |
jlaska | saccia: I believe that screen depends on your drive and partition selections, but let's continue to diagnose that after the meeting in #fedora-qa | 15:43 |
jlaska | with regards to the mouse click, I'm still not able to reproduce | 15:44 |
jlaska | but it seems that two of you are seeing this problem on test@ | 15:44 |
dgilmore | jlaska: do we have all the info on the setups? video cards, type of mouse and how its connected? | 15:44 |
jlaska | dgilmore: not in the bug mentioned above | 15:45 |
dgilmore | jlaska: seems like we need to know more about the hardware people are having issues on | 15:45 |
jlaska | the bug mentions another issue, 632431, which I'd consider a feature request | 15:45 |
jlaska | dgilmore: of course, agreed | 15:45 |
jlaska | so, summary ... F14Beta is accurate for what we know right now | 15:46 |
jlaska | and there are 2 issues under discussion (those noted by saccia) to determine their impact to users | 15:46 |
saccia | dgilmore: if you can add something in the bug detailing how to get whatever logs/info you need I'll be happy to get that info | 15:46 |
dgilmore | jlaska: at the leastw e are going to need anaconda and likely a ConsoleKit update | 15:46 |
jlaska | dgilmore: yeah | 15:46 |
jlaska | on top of this ... we need to complete the planned testing | 15:46 |
jlaska | #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test | 15:46 |
jlaska | #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test | 15:47 |
jlaska | with the late start and respins ... we're obviously short on test time | 15:47 |
dgilmore | jlaska: go/nogo is wednesday? | 15:48 |
jlaska | I think sticking with the phrase 'at risk' also accurately describes QA testing for F-14-Beta | 15:48 |
jlaska | dgilmore: you got it ... Wed 2010-09-22 | 15:48 |
jlaska | #info 2010-09-22 - Fedora 14 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting (17:00 EST) | 15:48 |
dgilmore | jlaska: ok so we really need to get rc3 done today | 15:48 |
Oxf13 | time == crunch | 15:48 |
jlaska | dgilmore: yeah, by end of day today at least | 15:49 |
dgilmore | jlaska: do you feell that testing rc2 livecds for desktop is ok? | 15:49 |
jlaska | dgilmore: sorry, can you rephrase? | 15:49 |
dgilmore | jlaska: should i try do some testing with the livecds today while waiting for fixes? or best to wait for rc3 | 15:50 |
jlaska | dgilmore: oh I see ... I'd go ahead and test anyway | 15:50 |
jlaska | I'm doing my best to fill out results in the install matrix using RC2 | 15:50 |
jlaska | any other questions/concerns around F-14-Beta? | 15:51 |
robatino | some tests can be marked as fail just because of the missing boot menu | 15:51 |
robatino | memtest for example | 15:51 |
jlaska | robatino: good point, I haven't marked those as fail yet | 15:51 |
Oxf13 | I wonder if we need a new indicator | 15:51 |
* jlaska trying to knock out the hardware, partitioning, updates and traceback cases | 15:51 | |
Oxf13 | blocked vs pass/fail | 15:51 |
jlaska | Oxf13: meh ... no real opinion there ... I'm happy to update https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Result if there is overwhelming desire for blocked | 15:52 |
Oxf13 | not sure if it's overwhelming, just wondering if a blocked test means anything different to us than a failed test | 15:53 |
jlaska | right now, I haven't found a big need to distinguish between the two | 15:53 |
Oxf13 | some sort of relational test matrix would help | 15:53 |
jlaska | you're right, it certainly has different meaning | 15:53 |
jlaska | The <ref name="..."> has helped for re-using existing bugs/failures for test results | 15:54 |
jlaska | so at least we have a mostly unique list of bugs in the References section | 15:54 |
jlaska | alright ... any other F-14-Beta thoughts? | 15:54 |
Oxf13 | k | 15:55 |
jlaska | if not ... | 15:55 |
jlaska | #topic Open Discussion - <your topic here> | 15:55 |
jlaska | thoughts/comments/concerns/hicu | 15:55 |
jlaska | if not ... let's close this out in 2 minutes and get back to F-14-Beta | 15:56 |
Oxf13 | haikus are easy; But sometimes they don't make sense; Refrigerator | 15:56 |
bcl | bz#627789 | 15:56 |
jlaska | Oxf13: thank you for proper spelling! :) | 15:57 |
Oxf13 | Southern_Gentlem: care to join #fedora-devel and talk about your respin issue? | 15:57 |
bcl | It didn't make it into f14-beta-branch, and I'm hitting it when I use livecd tools to make a usb stick with the DVD iso. | 15:57 |
bcl | I probably shouldn't have closed it as fixed in rawhide. But I also don't see a large number of other reports on it. | 15:58 |
jlaska | bcl: only 1 dup so far | 15:58 |
jlaska | " | 15:58 |
jlaska | "Problem was a race between unmounting the iso and deactivating the loopback. | 15:58 |
jlaska | mount can now handle mounting iso's with loop without needing losetup." | 15:58 |
jlaska | bcl: is this a fix we need to consider for F14Beta? | 15:59 |
bcl | I think so, but that's because I keep hitting it with my usage :) | 15:59 |
saccia | haiku Fedora 14 / Is still very green and new / More tests must we do | 15:59 |
jlaska | #info 627789 - Error setting up repository - 16, Device busy | 15:59 |
jlaska | saccia: kudos :) | 16:00 |
jlaska | bcl: I'll ping you in #anaconda afterwards to understand more about this | 16:00 |
bcl | ok | 16:00 |
jlaska | alright gang ... thanks for your time. I'm calling end of meeting | 16:01 |
jlaska | happy testing :) | 16:01 |
wwoods | thanks jlaska! | 16:01 |
jlaska | #endmeeting | 16:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!