From Fedora Project Wiki
Attendees
People present (lines said):
- jlaska (162)
- adamw (41)
- kparal (27)
- tflink (19)
- rbergeron (12)
- robatino (5)
- nirik (3)
- StylusEater_work (2)
- vhumpa (2)
- jskladan (1)
- fenrus02 (1)
- brunowolff (1)
- the_hydra (1)
- Viking-Ice (1)
- jsmith (1)
- michich (1)
Unable to attend:
Agenda
Previous meeting follow-up
- tflink to follow-up with cloud sig for test day recap
F-15-Final-RC1 status
- STATUS: ETA - Wednesday, May 11 -- see rel-eng#4697
- Continue to monitor for blocker bugs at Current_Release_Blockers
- Robatino and rhe prepared to send RC1 ISO announcements to test-announce@.
- Robatino already created Final RC1 QA wiki pages at
- The team conducted a *mini* review of 2 accepted and 1 proposed blocker bugs ...
- RHBZ #697834 - gnome-menus - Other menu appears in default installation (any .desktop entry with Category=Settings ends up here (even if there's also Category=System))
- Unclear what this needs to move forward, jlaska will reach out to mclasen for guidance
- AdamW researching and testing a patch to resolve the issue
- RHBZ #693809 - imsettings - Error message about missing input methods should be removed
- Waiting to hear back from tagoh to respond to caillon feedback.
- jlaska will reach out to caillon to confirm that recent comments are still inline with original bug report
- RHBZ #702650 - plymouth - Concurrency problem when unlocking partition
- kparal retesting and plans to reach out to test@ for feedback
- halfline is on PTO, lennart said he would provide feedback in his absence
- RHBZ #697834 - gnome-menus - Other menu appears in default installation (any .desktop entry with Category=Settings ends up here (even if there's also Category=System))
AutoQA update
- AutoQA trac milestones have been changed to reflect the new topic for 0.5.0 release - making AutoQA results more user-friendly (for package-maintainers). https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/milestone/0.5.0
- We held a meeting where we discussed different approaches related to 0.5.0 milestone. tflink was kind enough to create a record of it: https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/wiki/Planning050series
- We agreed to substantially lower the number of emails that are currently sent to package maintainers through Bodhi comments. We will also improve the structure and contents of the test log - it will be specific to a particular update, it won't contain many other updates any more. Every test will be documented on Fedora wiki and the most information will be provided there.
- We tackled a problem with too low disk space on AutoQA server that resulted in massive deletion of very recent logs. And we will continue to work on it. The problem was caused by some stuck-in-a-loop tests that generated many GBs of test logs.
- jlaska reported that the quick changes made on Friday dramatically reduced the size of depcheck test logs on the autoqa server. Special thanks to smooge for providing additional disk space for our guest
Upcoming QA events
- Wednesday, May 11 - Final Candidate testing starts
- Tuesday, May 17 - Go/NoGo meeting
- Tuesday, May 24 - Final (GA) release
Open Discussion - <your topic here>
Review proposed NTH bugs
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674321 - exo shouldn't take x-scheme-handler/file mimetype
- AGREED: 674321 - AcceptedNTH - impacts desktop criteria for non-default desktop
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694900 - Missing icon in xfce4-panel 'Add new items' dialog
- AGREED: 694900 - AcceptedNTH - obvious polish issue for non-default desktop
- For bugs related to F14->F15 upgrades where configured services are no longer starting under systemd - jlaska will file bugs and will raise/discuss after meeting.
Action items
- jlaska to follow-up w/ halfline on bug#702650
- kparal + jlaska to continue testing bug#702650
- adamw proposing patch for bug#697834
- jlaska - file proposed NTH bugs for F14->F15
IRC Log
| jlaska | #startmeeting Fedora QA Meeting | 15:00 |
|---|---|---|
| zodbot | Meeting started Mon May 9 15:00:47 2011 UTC. The chair is jlaska. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| zodbot | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. | 15:00 |
| jlaska | #meetingname fedora-qa-meeting | 15:00 |
| zodbot | The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa-meeting' | 15:00 |
| jlaska | #topic Roll Call ... | 15:00 |
| * tflink is here | 15:01 | |
| jlaska | Hi folks ... let's get this party started | 15:01 |
| * StylusEater_work is here | 15:01 | |
| jlaska | wave your electronic hands so we know who is here | 15:01 |
| adamw | yo | 15:01 |
| jlaska | tflink, StylusEater_work, adamw: greetings | 15:01 |
| * the_hydra is newcomer...willing to learn | 15:01 | |
| jlaska | regrets for brunowolff ... we'll catch up with him later | 15:01 |
| * kparal is here | 15:01 | |
| * fenrus02 waves bacon around to share | 15:02 | |
| jlaska | welcome the_hydra and kparal :) | 15:02 |
| * vhumpa say hey there | 15:02 | |
| jlaska | greetings vhumpa | 15:02 |
| rbergeron | woop woop | 15:02 |
| vhumpa | ^^^ says :-) | 15:02 |
| * jskladan lurks | 15:02 | |
| rbergeron | wave your hands in the aiiiiiir and grab some baaaaaconnnnnn | 15:02 |
| jlaska | jskladan: rbergeron: hi folks | 15:03 |
| jlaska | oh, bacon, where? | 15:03 |
| * StylusEater_work snags some bacon | 15:03 | |
| adamw | then what do we do with the bacon? | 15:03 |
| jlaska | robatino: Viking-Ice? who else are we missing? | 15:03 |
| * robatino here | 15:03 | |
| jlaska | alright ... I think we are "critically massy" now | 15:03 |
| rbergeron | adamw: insert bacon in mouth | 15:03 |
| rbergeron | then enjoy | 15:03 |
| jlaska | rbergeron: can you create a wiki test case for that please? | 15:04 |
| jlaska | : | 15:04 |
| jlaska | :) | 15:04 |
| jlaska | #topic Previous meeting follow-up | 15:04 |
| jlaska | I had only 1 item on my list from last week | 15:04 |
| jlaska | #info tflink to follow-up with cloud sig for test day recap | 15:04 |
| jlaska | I think this is stalled because a lot of folks were out @ summit last week? | 15:04 |
| jlaska | tflink: any news/updates ... anything I can help with on this one? | 15:05 |
| tflink | I heard back from mgoldmann and while he was busy @ summit/JBW last week, he's planning to send out a recap this week | 15:05 |
| jlaska | eggsellent, thanks for the update. Let's keep this on the list for next week | 15:06 |
| rbergeron | i think he literally just got back yesterday | 15:06 |
| jlaska | and his arms are probably tired! | 15:06 |
| jlaska | hey-yoooo! | 15:06 |
| jlaska | you see, after he just flew in from. ... oh nm | 15:06 |
| jlaska | anything else from last week that I failed to capture in the minutes? | 15:07 |
| adamw | i'm still recovering from that last joke | 15:07 |
| jlaska | haha, be sure to tip your waiter | 15:07 |
| jlaska | alright ... let's dive into the main course ... | 15:07 |
| jlaska | #topic F-15-Final-RC1 status | 15:08 |
| jlaska | So, really this should be F-15-Final-TC1 status, but since the RC1 is slated for composition for rel-eng starting today ... I changed it | 15:08 |
| jlaska | We aren't expecting delivery of F-15-Final-RC1 until Wednesday | 15:08 |
| jlaska | this gives rel-eng time to work through any late-breaking compose issues | 15:08 |
| jlaska | #link https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4697 | 15:09 |
| jlaska | I just added a slew up updates to that ticket that I believe we need rel-eng to include in RC1 | 15:09 |
| adamw | we also have open blockers, right> | 15:09 |
| jlaska | you got it! | 15:09 |
| jlaska | if you don't mind, we'll walk through those in a moment (hopefully quickly) | 15:09 |
| jlaska | #info Continue to monitor for blocker bugs at Current_Release_Blockers | 15:09 |
| jlaska | looks like robatino continues to rock ... | 15:09 |
| jlaska | #info Robatino prepared wiki pages for RC1 test tracking (see | 15:10 |
| jlaska | I guess depending on when RC1 lands, either robatino or rhe will handle blasting the test announcement? | 15:10 |
| robatino | i can assuming i'm around | 15:11 |
| jlaska | adamw: tflink: rbergeron: btw ... thanks for processing the bugs during the blocker review last Friday ... looks like some good progress was made | 15:11 |
| * rbergeron points at everyone else and takes absolutely no credit | 15:11 | |
| jlaska | robatino: thank you ... and I'm sure rhe will happily grab that if it lands during her daytime | 15:11 |
| jlaska | alright ... who likes bugs? | 15:12 |
| jlaska | good, good ... now who likes quickly reviewing bugs? | 15:12 |
| * jlaska raises hand | 15:12 | |
| * tflink likes bug reviews to be done :) | 15:12 | |
| adamw | still tired...see...because of his arms... | 15:12 |
| tflink | not so much on the doing part | 15:12 |
| jlaska | heck yeah! Can you believe that's almost here :) | 15:12 |
| jlaska | adamw: LOL! | 15:13 |
| jlaska | adamw: get it, get it? | 15:13 |
| * adamw drools from one side of his mouth | 15:13 | |
| jlaska | alright ... so there are 2 AcceptedBlocker bugs that are still OPEN | 15:13 |
| * rbergeron adds a piece of bacon to block the drool | 15:13 | |
| jlaska | I'll take gnome-menus for $1000 please ... | 15:13 |
| jlaska | #info bug#697834 - gnome-menus - Other menu appears in default installation (any .desktop entry with Category=Settings ends up here (even if there's also Category=System)) | 15:13 |
| adamw | ...sigh. | 15:14 |
| jlaska | so it seems that mclasen is proposing that we drop the 'Other' menu criteria for F15? | 15:14 |
| jlaska | or is there something else preventing this from moving forward? | 15:14 |
| rbergeron | this isn't a case of "and later we'll add the "other" menu criteria back in" is it? | 15:15 |
| jlaska | For those not familiar with the blocker review format ... we are checking in on any unresolved AcceptedBlocker bugs and deciding what is needed to move them forward | 15:15 |
| adamw | mclas: yes, but he's very short on reasons | 15:15 |
| adamw | grr | 15:16 |
| adamw | jlaska: he's very short on reasons | 15:16 |
| adamw | it bugs me that they are seemingly putting their foot down on fixing this for no good reason | 15:16 |
| tflink | yeah, I don't really understand the hangup either | 15:16 |
| adamw | it's literally about a three-line fix in gnome-menus | 15:16 |
| adamw | i guess i'll post a patch and see if that helps | 15:16 |
| jlaska | ooh good approach | 15:16 |
| jlaska | I was going to suggest we sync up w/ mclasen post meeting in #fedora-desktop to see if we can agree on something | 15:16 |
| jlaska | in fact, let's do both | 15:17 |
| jlaska | thanks adamw | 15:17 |
| jlaska | anything else on this one? | 15:17 |
| * jlaska thinks that should help get resolution *today* on this | 15:17 | |
| jlaska | okay ... next up ... | 15:18 |
| jlaska | #info bug#693809 - imsettings - Error message about missing input methods should be removed | 15:18 |
| jlaska | I've reached out to tagoh on this one, but I don't expect a response until he's awake | 15:18 |
| jlaska | I'd like to catch up w/ caillon too to see if there's anything we can do to help this along before tagoh is online | 15:18 |
| * jlaska open to any other suggestions | 15:19 | |
| jlaska | if there are none, I'll tell more jokes | 15:19 |
| tflink | I don't think that there is much else that we can do | 15:19 |
| tflink | at the moment, anyways | 15:19 |
| jlaska | another thought, does the new stuff proposed by caillon change the intent of this bug | 15:20 |
| jlaska | in other words, is this still the same issue that was AcceptedBlocker? | 15:20 |
| jlaska | I'll follow-up with caillon with this q ... "Is the original reported issue resolved, but there are additional improvements that could be made?" | 15:20 |
| * jlaska prepares to move on ... | 15:21 | |
| adamw | they seem like significant issues to me | 15:21 |
| jlaska | okay | 15:21 |
| adamw | but they're different from the initial report | 15:21 |
| jlaska | I'm willing to bet caillon understands the time crunch, and has a keen sense for what is required, vs what can be resolved later | 15:22 |
| jlaska | I'll update the bz if anything surfaces that requires re-thinking the issue | 15:22 |
| jlaska | adamw: seem sensible? | 15:22 |
| jlaska | #info bug#702650 - plymouth - Concurrency problem when unlocking partition | 15:23 |
| jlaska | Looks like kparal provided the requested plymouth.debug logs ... I think we just need input from halfline to proceed | 15:23 |
| kparal | jlaska: I did, but not reproducing the bug | 15:23 |
| kparal | jlaska: it just didn't manifested with plymouth.debug on | 15:23 |
| jlaska | Oh, so everytime you boot with plymouth debugging, the bug doesn't reproduce? | 15:24 |
| kparal | and, I don't know how to disable plymouth. no documentation whatsoever | 15:24 |
| michich | plymouth.enable=0 | 15:24 |
| kparal | jlaska: yes | 15:24 |
| kparal | michich: thanks. unfortunately it seems to be written nowhere | 15:24 |
| * kparal will try that asap | 15:24 | |
| jlaska | michich: Huh, I don't see that as a supported boot option | 15:25 |
| kparal | jlaska: I'll try a few more rounds after the meeting | 15:25 |
| jlaska | kparal: okay, thanks | 15:25 |
| jlaska | This issue is still only proposed, not accepted | 15:25 |
| adamw | see comment #6 | 15:25 |
| jlaska | yeah, just read | 15:26 |
| jlaska | Worth a call to test@ for feedback from people with non-root encrypted partitions? | 15:26 |
| jlaska | I can queue up a few installs post-meeting to test | 15:26 |
| tflink | probably | 15:26 |
| kparal | I think it should be pretty easy to reproduce. I did several installations | 15:26 |
| kparal | I hit the bug in at least 50% of system boots on those installations | 15:27 |
| jlaska | fascinating | 15:27 |
| tflink | kparal: did that increase? your original report said 33% | 15:27 |
| jlaska | and concerning we haven't seen this before | 15:27 |
| * jsmith pays closer attention | 15:27 | |
| kparal | tflink: yeah, I underestimated a little, not to be an alarmist :-) I also did more runs after that | 15:27 |
| jlaska | anything else we can do with this issue in _this_ meeting? | 15:28 |
| jlaska | sounds like we're going to continue retesting (kparal and jlaska) | 15:28 |
| adamw | kparal: it'd be good to add that to the report | 15:28 |
| kparal | yep | 15:28 |
| adamw | (info that you hit it in several re-installs) | 15:28 |
| kparal | adamw: ok | 15:28 |
| jlaska | and I'll see if I can get help from halfline post-meeting | 15:28 |
| jlaska | okay ... I think we are done on this topic | 15:29 |
| jlaska | #action jlaska to follow-up w/ halfline on bug#702650 | 15:30 |
| jlaska | #action kparal + jlaska to continue testing bug#702650 | 15:30 |
| jlaska | #action adamw proposing patch for bug#697834 | 15:30 |
| jlaska | #topic AutoQA update | 15:31 |
| jlaska | Okay, quite a busy week for AutoQA ... I'm still behind on autoqa-devel@ mails | 15:31 |
| tflink | we aim to keep you on your toes :) | 15:31 |
| jlaska | Any exciting news to share? | 15:31 |
| jlaska | haha, </success> :D | 15:31 |
| * kparal is the man for sharing updates | 15:31 | |
| kparal | but just shortly, if you don't mind | 15:31 |
| * kparal likes short updates | 15:32 | |
| kparal | #info AutoQA trac milestones have been changed to reflect the new topic for 0.5.0 release - making AutoQA results more user-friendly (for package-maintainers). | 15:32 |
| kparal | #link https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/milestone/0.5.0 | 15:32 |
| kparal | #info We have held a meeting where we discussed different approaches related to 0.5.0 milestone. tflink was kind enough to create a record of it: | 15:32 |
| kparal | #link https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/wiki/Planning050series | 15:32 |
| kparal | #info We have agreed to substantially lower the number of emails that are currently sent to package maintainers through Bodhi comments. We will also improve the structure and contents of the test log - it will be specific to a particular update, it won't contain many other updates any more. Every test will be documented on Fedora wiki and the most information will be provided there. | 15:33 |
| kparal | of course, if you have some related proposals, don't be afraid to talk to us at autoqa-devel mailing list | 15:33 |
| kparal | and one more thing from the last week: | 15:34 |
| kparal | #info We have tackled a problem with too low disk space on AutoQA server that resulted in massive deletion of very recent logs. And we will continue to work on it. The problem was caused by some stuck-in-a-loop tests that generated many GBs of test logs. | 15:34 |
| kparal | ok, that's all I have in my notes. did I forget anything? | 15:35 |
| tflink | nothing that's coming to mind ATM | 15:35 |
| jlaska | Regarding the disk space ... we briefly discussed on #fedora-qa earlier that it looks like the corrected tmpwatch command-line used by cron, and the log compression script are working nicely | 15:36 |
| jlaska | Looks like our scrambling paid off so far | 15:36 |
| jlaska | oh, and extra kudos for smooge for helping us get more disk space | 15:36 |
| tflink | jlaska: do you know how many multi-GB log files we've had since thursday? | 15:36 |
| tflink | jlaska: on second thought, that is a better conversation for not here | 15:37 |
| jlaska | tflink: okay | 15:37 |
| kparal | jlaska: ah, I mixed it up a little. yes, the second problem was bug in tmpwatch | 15:37 |
| jlaska | tflink: I'm looking for any bug reports against RHEL5 tmpwatch ... if not, I'll log something (or check upstream changelogs) | 15:37 |
| jlaska | kparal: thanks for the updates ... if nothing else, we'll move on to the Open Mic portion | 15:38 |
| kparal | that's all | 15:38 |
| * jlaska hoping for another productive AutoQA week ... in the face of RC1 | 15:38 | |
| * jlaska gives RC1 the evil eye | 15:38 | |
| jlaska | okay, I lied ... let's do a quick look at the QA calendar | 15:39 |
| jlaska | #topic Upcoming QA events | 15:39 |
| jlaska | #info Wednesday, May 11 - Final Candidate testing starts | 15:39 |
| jlaska | #info Tuesday, May 17 - Go/NoGo meeting | 15:39 |
| jlaska | #info Tuesday, May 24 - Final (GA) release | 15:40 |
| robatino | would like to be sure that the compose is scheduled for the 11th - in the bugzappers meeting it was stated it would be the 10th | 15:40 |
| jlaska | robatino: I think we give rel-eng a window to get things lined up ... by Wednesday | 15:41 |
| jlaska | I think that gives dgilmore a chance to start composing nwo to work out any compose-related problems ahead of time | 15:41 |
| jlaska | and once the proposed and accepted blocker list is cleared ... I think we can green light the RC1 compose | 15:41 |
| * rbergeron wonders if the schedule was confusing to someone or if something is wrong or if someone just read something incorrectly.. ? | 15:41 | |
| adamw | did it change? | 15:41 |
| rbergeron | it shouldn't have | 15:42 |
| rbergeron | maybe there's confusion about when it starts and when it is delivered | 15:42 |
| robatino | in the past the scheduled date for the compose has always been the same as the testing start date | 15:43 |
| jlaska | adamw: I've tried to accumulate a list of NTH and other important bodhi updates needed for RC1, but I don't know if I'm following the same process you've done in the past | 15:43 |
| robatino | so when it was stated in the bugzappers meeting that it would be on the 10th, i was confused since the schedule says that testing starts on the 11th | 15:43 |
| adamw | if you're looking at updates submitted for nth, yes. | 15:43 |
| adamw | 'other important' updates worries me, though. the whole point of nth is there should be no 'other important' updates. | 15:43 |
| adamw | anything you want to get in compose after freeze, should go through nth or blocker process. | 15:43 |
| jlaska | adamw: yup ... they should be NTH ... but no bugs were filed for each of them | 15:44 |
| adamw | then we should file bugs and jump through the hoops | 15:44 |
| jlaska | adamw: I don't want to bypass the process, so I ... yes :) | 15:44 |
| adamw | otherwise we're back to arbitrary freeze breaks and there's no point having a process | 15:44 |
| adamw | okay :) | 15:44 |
| jlaska | agreed | 15:44 |
| adamw | but, i see only two bugs on the 'proposed NTH' list | 15:44 |
| adamw | (which we should probably review) | 15:44 |
| jlaska | good call | 15:45 |
| jlaska | I'll save that for open discussion in a sec ... | 15:45 |
| jlaska | Anything else related to upcoming schedule? | 15:45 |
| rbergeron | robatino: so the compose is scheduled to take a full day - which is why testing doesn't start till the next day - i'll go back and see if that was changed at some point or alternately if I broke something at some point (though I don't remember touching this) | 15:45 |
| jlaska | okay, moving on then ... | 15:46 |
| jlaska | #topic Open Discussion - <your topic here> | 15:46 |
| jlaska | Adam reminded me that we have 2 proposed NTH bugs on the list for review ... if no other discussion topics, I'll dive into that | 15:46 |
| adamw | i'm hoping there'll be three in a minute | 15:47 |
| adamw | as there's a sugar update we want in but no bug filed for the issues it fixes yet... | 15:47 |
| jlaska | adamw: btw ... these other bugs I listed are all clones of 699198 (just against different services) | 15:47 |
| jlaska | it's the same deal ... there are updates that resolve the problems, but no bugs yet ... I'll get those filed post-meeting | 15:47 |
| adamw | are they all caused by the rpm trigger issue? | 15:48 |
| jlaska | #action jlaska - file proposed NTH bugs for F14->F15 | 15:48 |
| jlaska | adamw: it's the same end-result ... some have different fixes | 15:48 |
| jlaska | a default enabled service in F14, isn't enabled post-F15 upgrade | 15:48 |
| jlaska | #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674321 | 15:49 |
| jlaska | #info exo shouldn't take x-scheme-handler/file mimetype | 15:49 |
| adamw | okay, but different causes. | 15:49 |
| jlaska | adamw: yup | 15:49 |
| adamw | these are both Xfce 'blocker' bugs | 15:49 |
| jlaska | some are incorrect package deps etc.. etc... I'll get them on the list and we can review post-meeting | 15:49 |
| nirik | this causes problems with people with Xfce + other desktop they use. | 15:50 |
| * jlaska reminds our listeners about QA:SOP_nth_bug_process | 15:50 | |
| nirik | they get exo handling links in gnome and such. | 15:50 |
| jlaska | by definition, non-default desktop issues are automatic NTH bugs | 15:50 |
| jlaska | "bugs which constitute infringements of the desktop-related Fedora_Release_Criteria as applied to non-default desktops " | 15:50 |
| jlaska | +1 NTH | 15:50 |
| jlaska | ack/nak/patch? | 15:50 |
| adamw | ack | 15:51 |
| * nirik nods. | 15:51 | |
| tflink | ack | 15:51 |
| * adamw will secretary-ize | 15:52 | |
| jlaska | #agreed 674321 - AcceptedNTH - impacts desktop criteria for non-default desktop | 15:52 |
| jlaska | adamw: thx | 15:52 |
| jlaska | #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694900 | 15:52 |
| jlaska | #info Missing icon in xfce4-panel 'Add new items' dialog | 15:52 |
| tflink | isn't that blocking the wrong bug? | 15:53 |
| jlaska | hmm, this seems border-line ... I'm not sure if our desktop criteria require that *all* menus have icons | 15:53 |
| tflink | nvm | 15:53 |
| jlaska | but either way, given this is for a non-default desktop ... this seems fitting for NTH | 15:53 |
| adamw | jlaska: borderline for the blocker criteria, but i'm happy taking it as nth as an obvious polish issue | 15:53 |
| adamw | so +1 nth | 15:54 |
| tflink | and a fix is available | 15:54 |
| tflink | +1 nth | 15:54 |
| jlaska | oh, I didn't think borderline for blocker at all | 15:54 |
| jlaska | +1 nth | 15:54 |
| jlaska | okay, I think we have enough NTH votes ... | 15:54 |
| adamw | yup | 15:54 |
| jlaska | #agreed 694900 - AcceptedNTH - obvious polish issue for non-default desktop | 15:54 |
| adamw | the sugar thing is a bit complex as the update doesn't specify exactly what triggers the bugs in question, so i'm having trouble filing 'retroactive' bugs for it...i'll do it later and ping you folks | 15:54 |
| jlaska | btw ... anyone can vote on these issues | 15:55 |
| tflink | jlaska, adamw: who's doing the bz updates? | 15:55 |
| adamw | jlaska: do you have bugs ready for the initscript issues? | 15:55 |
| adamw | tflink: i am, | 15:55 |
| jlaska | tflink: adamw is | 15:55 |
| jlaska | adamw: no I don't | 15:55 |
| jlaska | adamw: that's going to take a bit :) | 15:55 |
| jlaska | #chair adamw | 15:55 |
| zodbot | Current chairs: adamw jlaska | 15:55 |
| jlaska | adamw: can you #topic your sugar bug? | 15:55 |
| jlaska | stand-by .... | 15:58 |
| Viking-Ice | drops in late | 15:58 |
| jlaska | okay, if no other bugs then ... let's close this out and continue on #fedora-qa | 15:59 |
| jlaska | #topic Open Discussion - Last call | 15:59 |
| brunowolff | I just got back if you did have something for me. I am just starting to catch up on the log. | 15:59 |
| jlaska | Welcome Viking-Ice and brunowolff | 15:59 |
| adamw | jlaska: i don't want to do sugar yet, see above | 15:59 |
| jlaska | adamw: ah, sounds like you're in the same boat as me :) | 15:59 |
| jlaska | welcome | 15:59 |
| jlaska | okay, I'll #endmeeting in 1 minute unless there are any topics | 16:00 |
| jlaska | 15 seconds until #endmeeting ... | 16:00 |
| jlaska | Thank you for your time ... I'll follow-up to the list with minutes | 16:01 |
| jlaska | #endmeeting | 16:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!