From Fedora Project Wiki
Fedora Release Engineering Meeting :: Monday 2008-04-07
Fedora 9 Readiness
- Final freeze on Tuesday, April 8, 2008
- Internet2 issue could affect ability to feed mirrors at F9 GA
- Ongoing review of blocker bugs until GA
IRC Transcript
f13 | ping: notting jeremy jwb wwoods warren lmacken poelcat rdieter | 13:01 |
---|---|---|
* poelcat here | 13:02 | |
f13 | (wwoods is out) | 13:02 |
* notting is here | 13:02 | |
* jwb is here | 13:02 | |
* lmacken is here | 13:02 | |
* warren here | 13:02 | |
f13 | aight, lets get started. | 13:03 |
-!- f13 changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Fedora Release Engineering Meeting - Fedora 9 Final Freeze | 13:03 | |
f13 | The final freeze is tomorrow, and as usual I'm going to setup an at job to throw the switch tonight so tomorrow's rawhide is the frozen content. | 13:03 |
f13 | I've got f9-final tag in koji already, and I'm updating it with the latest builds from dist-f9 | 13:04 |
notting | we're having an early tuesday freeze, not a late tuesday freeze? | 13:04 |
f13 | I'm going to start signing tonight too, if the clone finishes in time. | 13:04 |
f13 | notting: yeah, we did that for Alpha and Beta | 13:04 |
f13 | gives releng an extra day of testing | 13:04 |
warren | how are we feeling about the stability of rawhide? I had some worrying crashes during the weekend (no compiz involved) | 13:04 |
f13 | warren: I'm not "happy" but I'm not slitting my wrists yet. | 13:05 |
poelcat | today's rawhide was good for me http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra/RawhideToday | 13:05 |
jwb | rawhide has been fine for me since beta | 13:05 |
jwb | with the exception of hibernate | 13:06 |
jlaska | warren: I think it largely depends on what components you're interested in | 13:06 |
f13 | Well, I triggered a blocker bug this morning in anaconda, so that's lame for me | 13:06 |
f13 | and I still have to plow through this upgrade stuff. | 13:06 |
warren | jlaska: oh nothing important, just dbus-daemon crashing, X deadlocking, and kernel oopsing | 13:07 |
f13 | upgrades in general are scary. | 13:07 |
jwb | f13, what upgrade stuff? | 13:07 |
jlaska | details details ;) | 13:07 |
f13 | jwb: finding things that went from multilib to not multilib and getting them blacklisted correctly in anaconda | 13:07 |
jwb | ah | 13:07 |
f13 | jwb: plus finding other upgrade gotchas. | 13:07 |
notting | i am concerned about our ability to deliver the preview, in light of mdomsch's discussion about final | 13:07 |
f13 | there are a number of upgrade related bugs on teh blocker list. | 13:07 |
jwb | notting, wait... what? | 13:07 |
f13 | notting: preview is just going ot be torrent only | 13:07 |
notting | ah, ok | 13:07 |
jlaska | f13: so dumb question ... once we freeze, the plan is then to widdle down the blocker bug list? | 13:07 |
notting | doom postponed! | 13:08 |
f13 | notting: it's like the regularly scheduled snapshot, just with a differen tname. | 13:08 |
notting | ok. i remain concerned about final, though. yuck. | 13:08 |
f13 | jlaska: yeah, I think each day we'll probably trim a bit more off the blocker list, and get more toward "we'd actually slip the release for this" | 13:08 |
* rdieter here (a little) | 13:08 | |
f13 | notting: as do I. | 13:08 |
f13 | for those not in the "know" | 13:08 |
poelcat | f13: how will we test out jigdo before GA? | 13:08 |
f13 | RH can't currently deliver any content over Internet2 to anybody | 13:08 |
f13 | which means our I2 mirrors get way behind | 13:09 |
warren | Al Gore didn't invent it yet. | 13:09 |
jwb | oh | 13:09 |
f13 | and all have ot use phx resources to get content, which is causing resource contention | 13:09 |
* jds2001 sits in the back | 13:09 | |
f13 | resources which are supposed to be shut off for releases due to not wanting to knock redhat.com off the internet again | 13:09 |
f13 | poelcat: I'm thinking of testing it by hand a bit with some custom mirrormanager urls that I'll ask mdomsch to create for me. | 13:10 |
notting | do we have everything in place needed for preupgrade? | 13:10 |
poelcat | f13: let me know if you want some help from a 'home user' :) | 13:10 |
f13 | notting: I have no idea on that front. I think we're awefully late to be landing "features" such as that. | 13:10 |
f13 | poelcat: will do, likely the mirrormanager url will just reference rawhide | 13:11 |
f13 | Part of the final freeze is also the mass CVS branching | 13:12 |
f13 | I'm not entirely sure why the schedule has it on the 9th, I probably asked for it and promptly forgot why | 13:12 |
f13 | but abadger1999 needs some time to try and recover some optimizations on the pkgdb/fas side of things to make the branching go faster. | 13:13 |
f13 | it's still probbaly going to require a cvs outage, and a mail shutoff to keep from mailbombing everybody | 13:13 |
abadger1999 | also note, I think the pure cvs side of things has slowed down as well. | 13:14 |
jwb | f13, maybe you were still thinking it was going to be a late tues freeze, so you wanted it on the 9th? | 13:14 |
f13 | I had a script at one point to do it, but that was pre fas2, and some other things have changed on pkgdb side, so I'll likely have to rewrite the script. | 13:14 |
f13 | jwb: could be. | 13:14 |
notting | abadger1999: it's not like modules ever gets *smaller* | 13:14 |
abadger1999 | Right. | 13:14 |
f13 | abadger1999: curious, if the cvs slowdown is the ACL lookup + the "whom do I mail" lookup | 13:14 |
f13 | which I would think with an outage we could kill both of those | 13:15 |
abadger1999 | Esp. the whom do I mail would speed things up. | 13:16 |
* abadger1999 writes a note to disable getnotifylist | 13:16 | |
warren | abadger1999: if we have a cvs outage, might we use that as an opportunity to finally rename cvsextras? | 13:16 |
abadger1999 | warren: You and f13 should work it out. I can make it happen whenever everyone wants it. | 13:17 |
warren | f13: any preference? | 13:18 |
f13 | warren: do you have a list of changes that would require? Maybe an open infrastructure ticket? noted which wiki pages need updating, etc..? | 13:19 |
f13 | I wouldn't be so keen on breaking cvs at the critical point in our release. Much more comfortable doing it post-f9 | 13:19 |
warren | yeah, that might be a better idea | 13:21 |
f13 | I'm going to be flipping the fedora-release bit to make it look like F9, as well as turning off rawhide and on the "fedora" and "updates" repos. We'll pull a mirrormanager trick again and just have those redirect to rawhide. | 13:21 |
f13 | (which should aide in testing out jigdo prior to release day) | 13:22 |
warren | cool | 13:22 |
warren | perfect | 13:22 |
f13 | and the rest of the time is just losing sleep over blocker lists. | 13:22 |
f13 | So, open floor on F9 Final issues. | 13:22 |
notting | if we can't push it, we can't ship it. | 13:23 |
f13 | yep | 13:23 |
f13 | I'm probably going to harass people daily about this | 13:23 |
notting | for F7 EOL, do we want to pick a date now, or wait until we're a little more clear on the panic/don't panic state of the blocker list? | 13:24 |
f13 | I'd say panic/don't panic. | 13:25 |
f13 | wait until we have a real RC | 13:25 |
warren | Do we consider the upstart fails to shutdown, upstart causing always/frequent unclean unmount issues, possibly related runlevel changes do nothing... blockers? | 13:25 |
notting | warren: the hell? | 13:25 |
f13 | warren: have you been able to find anybody else who sees this? | 13:26 |
notting | please elaborate on your first and second comments with bug numbers | 13:26 |
warren | really nobody else is seeing this? wow. | 13:26 |
poelcat | related to that F7 EOL and the recent ______ on f-dev-list about those darn BugZappers | 13:26 |
poelcat | are there any compelling reasons to keep EOL bugs open? | 13:27 |
poelcat | someone shut me down if this is too much of a tangent for this meeting :) | 13:27 |
f13 | poelcat: well, the answer to that question is always "yes", but the real question is 'compelling enough to put up with the cruft' and that I think is no. | 13:27 |
notting | poelcat: only on an individual reporter/maintainer's opinion on specific bugs | 13:27 |
warren | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438444 switching to runlevel 1 does nothing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439699 you see nothing during shutdown (and sometimes it fails to shutdown) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438449 killall race (might possibly related) | 13:27 |
buggbot | Bug 438444: high, low, ---, Casey Dahlin, NEW , upstart - 'telinit 1' is not doing anything even close to advertised | 13:27 |
buggbot | Bug 439699: low, low, ---, Casey Dahlin, NEW , No shutdown msgs displayed | 13:27 |
buggbot | Bug 438449: low, low, ---, Casey Dahlin, NEW , /etc/rc.d/init.d/killall is racing with other "stops" | 13:27 |
warren | I've personally NEVER seen my filesystem not replay journal since we've switched to upstart | 13:27 |
notting | poelcat: does the bugzappers/triage stuff have an ability to only prod bugs once? | 13:27 |
notting | did you file a bug? | 13:28 |
poelcat | notting: sortof... we've got that c00l whiteboard tag ;-) | 13:28 |
warren | well, been relying on the existing bugs. | 13:28 |
notting | warren: none of those bugs have anything to do with journal replay | 13:28 |
warren | notting: if it fails to cleanly shutdown it might? | 13:29 |
notting | warren: presumably you'd notice that , considering you'd have to hit the power key, etc. | 13:29 |
warren | notting: it is inconsistent, but sometimes it powers off very quickly after I hit Shutdown | 13:30 |
poelcat | notting: so you're saying some way for a developmer to tag a bug as "don't auto close me" ? | 13:30 |
warren | sometimes I do have to hold down the power button because X died, I haven no login getty's, and it is just stuck | 13:30 |
notting | poelcat: i mean, once the triage system flags needinfo/whatever, i think it shouldn't try and do it *again* the next time it's chugging through rawhide | 13:30 |
jds2001 | well rawhide will be re-based to F9 | 13:31 |
poelcat | notting: well it shouldn't because the next action would be to ignore it or CLOSE if still needinfo | 13:31 |
notting | poelcat: and if it's moved to 'devel' again...? | 13:32 |
warren | in rare occasions I do actually see stuff shutting down | 13:32 |
poelcat | notting: then it stays in 'rawhide' until the next GA when it gets rebased to the GA version | 13:32 |
jds2001 | it'll get put in the frying pan for the next cycle i think. | 13:32 |
jds2001 | poelcat: +1 | 13:32 |
notting | poelcat: right. that's what i mean about only frobbing the bug once | 13:32 |
jds2001 | hmm, is there a compelling reason not to every 6 months? | 13:33 |
notting | not sure. i suppose we can see how it plays out | 13:33 |
notting | i suppose my bigger triage concern is 'only one message per bug plz' :) | 13:34 |
f13 | seems like we're drifting here. | 13:34 |
jds2001 | yeah, sorry bout that :( | 13:34 |
-!- f13 changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Fedora Release Engineering - Open Floor | 13:34 | |
notting | f13: apologies. | 13:34 |
notting | lmacken: bodhi need any prep for f9? | 13:36 |
lmacken | notting: I don't believe so | 13:37 |
lmacken | when do we want to start queueing up updates ? | 13:37 |
f13 | our sync scripts probably need updates | 13:37 |
lmacken | I can create the F9 release in bodhi at any time, and keep it locked | 13:37 |
f13 | lets wait until we've branched | 13:38 |
poelcat | f13: similar question for bug triage... when should we rebase rawhide-->f9 ? | 13:38 |
poelcat | or should I ask this somewhere else? | 13:39 |
f13 | poelcat: probably elsewhere, but I'd say after we start shipping F10 content in rawhide. | 13:40 |
f13 | which would be after F9 goes gold. | 13:40 |
poelcat | f13: okay thanks | 13:42 |
f13 | if there's nothing else, I'd like to wrap up and get back to work. | 13:43 |
warren | nod | 13:44 |
* warren looking into upstart issues... | 13:44 | |
f13 | thanks all! | 13:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!