From Fedora Project Wiki
3 December 2020
- 16:2916:29, 3 December 2020 diff hist +20 Changes/Rename libusb packages and deprecated old api More adjustments to get consistent names.
- 16:2816:28, 3 December 2020 diff hist +173 Changes/Rename libusb packages and deprecated old api Incorporate suggested changes from the mailing list
23 November 2020
- 15:0515:05, 23 November 2020 diff hist +2 Changes/Rename libusb packages and deprecated old api Hans reviewed it, so submitting it now.
- 15:0315:03, 23 November 2020 diff hist +4 m Changes/Rename libusb packages and deprecated old api add "may"
- 15:0115:01, 23 November 2020 diff hist −4 m Changes/Rename libusb packages and deprecated old api typo
- 14:1914:19, 23 November 2020 diff hist 0 m Changes/Rename libusb packages and deprecated old api →Benefit to Fedora
- 14:0914:09, 23 November 2020 diff hist +13,262 N Changes/Rename libusb packages and deprecated old api Created page with "<!-- The actual name of your proposed change page should look something like: Changes/Your_Change_Proposal_Name. This keeps all change proposals in the same namespace --> =..."
21 July 2020
- 11:3511:35, 21 July 2020 diff hist −31 Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS I got it wrong, EarlyOOM doesn't look at PSI information; it just has some code for statistics purposes in the repository
10 July 2020
- 15:1715:17, 10 July 2020 diff hist −18 m Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS clarify that deadline is final freeze
- 15:1615:16, 10 July 2020 diff hist −392 Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS mcatanzaro says this should be considered a system wide change (as it affects user processes), changing it and filling out most of the information
- 14:2114:21, 10 July 2020 diff hist +2 Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS Submit proposal, seems like people generally agree that this is a good idea
- 14:1314:13, 10 July 2020 diff hist 0 Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS Target F33
9 July 2020
- 11:2411:24, 9 July 2020 diff hist +55 Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS →How To Test
- 11:2111:21, 9 July 2020 diff hist +194 Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS No edit summary
- 11:1811:18, 9 July 2020 diff hist −1 m Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS No edit summary
- 10:4710:47, 9 July 2020 diff hist +183 Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS →How To Test
- 09:1809:18, 9 July 2020 diff hist +64 m Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS →Detailed Description
- 09:0709:07, 9 July 2020 diff hist −236 Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS Remove fork bomb suggestion … at least stress-ng with 500 processes just doesn't seem to cut it
- 08:5808:58, 9 July 2020 diff hist +166 m Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS →How To Test
- 08:5608:56, 9 July 2020 diff hist +29 m Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS →Scope
- 08:5308:53, 9 July 2020 diff hist +53 Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS →Summary
- 08:5108:51, 9 July 2020 diff hist +47 m Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS →How To Test
- 08:4908:49, 9 July 2020 diff hist −7 m Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS →Detailed Description
- 08:4808:48, 9 July 2020 diff hist +16,611 N Changes/Reserve resources for active user WS Create initial proposal
30 June 2020
- 11:3311:33, 30 June 2020 diff hist 0 Changes/ThermalManagementWS Resubmit change request (oops, edited comment earlier)
- 11:3211:32, 30 June 2020 diff hist +2 Changes/ThermalManagementWS Resubmit the change request (without the incomplete idea of shipping config separately)
29 June 2020
- 16:0316:03, 29 June 2020 diff hist +440 Changes/ThermalManagementWS Add an explanation what the status is of the idea to ship separate configuration files
- 15:5615:56, 29 June 2020 diff hist +734 Changes/ThermalManagementWS No edit summary
31 July 2019
- 09:5509:55, 31 July 2019 diff hist +2 Changes/ThermalManagementWS No edit summary
- 09:5409:54, 31 July 2019 diff hist −14 Changes/ThermalManagementWS →Contingency Plan
24 July 2019
- 16:3216:32, 24 July 2019 diff hist +221 Changes/ThermalManagementWS dptfxtract is non-free, so not essential part of the proposal