From Fedora Project Wiki
- * Implementation of Relative Radical Bounding box. * A brief document about Relative Radical Bounding box and "Radical Textbook".5 KB (682 words) - 20:27, 1 August 2008
- * Nothing radical, like has already been mentioned, get some of the original icons in SVG for4 KB (674 words) - 20:27, 19 September 2016
- ..., or launched directly into EC2. Fedora Atomic Host takes things in a more radical direction, providing a specialized system for running Docker containers and5 KB (797 words) - 14:15, 3 November 2015
- ...fer to ancient versions of the software may be erased. If you end up doing radical changes and re-write most of the spec file anyway, feel free to start the c10 KB (1,560 words) - 23:20, 29 January 2009
- ...nd contributing to SELinux confined users, which can achieve a precise and radical isolation/protection of data, processes and user accounts within graphical8 KB (1,131 words) - 11:31, 11 April 2024
- | style="color: #407a40" | wwoods had been talking about radical changes he'd like to see at the tail end too, but unfortunately he's not he | style="color: #8c4a4a" | There aren't any radical changes to the schedule per se - at least not against the version I'm looki31 KB (4,291 words) - 09:06, 18 September 2016
- ...a few changes to the way Upstart works and is a stepping stone to the more radical 1.0 release. This release is expected to be forward compatible, and also cu10 KB (1,567 words) - 10:56, 8 October 2010
- ...ted tickets</th><tr><td>1</td><td> [[User:radical| Gabriel PREDA]]</td><td>radical AT fedoraproject DOT org</td> <td>0</td></tr></table><h4> Russian Federatio52 KB (7,780 words) - 10:37, 27 June 2010
- This release will have a number of bugfixes and improvements, but no radical changes.10 KB (1,603 words) - 19:45, 2 June 2015
- ...f the real compose to make sure everything is going to work. We have more radical changes we would like to make in the F27 cycle (changes to dist-git branchi10 KB (1,539 words) - 16:58, 12 December 2016
- ...community of contributors to do and learn and teach Fedora marketing, with radical transparency as a cornerstone.8 KB (1,364 words) - 08:05, 18 September 2016
- | December 11, 2012 || [[Release Party F18]] || Bucharest, Romania || [[User:Radical | Gabriel PREDA]] || Fedora 18 Release Party || 20-30 ||11 KB (1,344 words) - 14:25, 9 January 2016
- * "Would it be radical to suggest that "packages" should be invisible to an admin that doesn't wan14 KB (2,299 words) - 16:36, 19 December 2013
- | style="color: #407a40" | is it too radical?40 KB (4,468 words) - 08:57, 8 July 2009
- .../thread/M4CBUVNN6A4QPIGHXLZUDUBCL2PYOE7O/#MP53HOT7CLJDEYJPWCB6CPDX7XF3FHBN radical suggestion for fc4 release] (15 years old, this is mostly about trimming ch19 KB (3,019 words) - 19:19, 13 January 2021
- ...hat it is too late to change the kmod standard (while suggesting even more radical changes himself) (note from thl: "too late to fix it before FC6 / RHEL5").27 KB (4,353 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- ...has been a complete failure. "OLPC has failures in abundance, but it is a radical, category-creating product."23 KB (3,452 words) - 10:40, 16 September 2009
- 12:49 < Lovechild> might I make a radical suggestion, some time ago I was talking to Jesse about getting good bug rep34 KB (5,520 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- [[User:Mchua|Mel Chua]] has worked<ref>http://blog.melchua.com/2009/06/08/radical-transparency-guys-it-doesnt-work-retroactively/</ref> to bring "open-source [[User:mccann|William Jon McCann]] was more radical<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/design-team/2009-June/000178.h27 KB (4,059 words) - 20:52, 15 June 2009
- ...d workflows were best placed to edit these pages, preferably before making radical changes to the workflow. Jesse responded[15] that he had been frankly unaw ...at didn't disturb packagers' workflows, yet laid the groundwork for a more radical change in the future. In response Jesse forwarded an @fedora-infra post fro57 KB (8,214 words) - 10:26, 14 April 2009